Connect with us

World

Palestinians protest against normalization of relations between Bahrain and Israel | Palestine News

Published

on

Palestinians protest against normalization of relations between Bahrain and Israel |  Palestine News

On Saturday, Palestinians in Gaza burned photographs of the leaders of Israel, America, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates in protest against the actions of the two Gulf countries to normalize relations with Israel.

Bahrain on Friday joined the UAE in agreeing to normalize relations with Israel, a move driven in part by widespread concerns over Iran, but which could leave Palestinians even more isolated.

The protest rally in Gaza, in which several dozen people took part, was organized by the ruling group Hamas.

“We must fight the virus of normalization and block all its paths before it can prevent its spread,” said Hamas spokesman Maher al-Holi.

Demonstrators set fire to images of US President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, King of Bahrain Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa and Crown Prince of the United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan

While the United States, Israel, the UAE and Bahrain welcome diplomatic moves as an important step towards peace and stability in middle Asia, Palestinians see this as a betrayal.

They fear a weakening of the long-standing pan-Arab position, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied territory and the acceptance of Palestinian statehood in exchange for normal relations with Arab countries.

Despite deep political divisions that erupted in 2007, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose Palestinian Authority (PA) has limited rule in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and his Hamas rivals have banded together against the actions of the Gulf states.

‘Military Union’

In the West Bank, Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Secretary General Saeb Erekat said a diplomatic push would not lead to peace unless the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict was resolved.

“The Bahraini, Israeli and American agreements to normalize relations are now part of a larger package in the region. This is not about peace, this is not about relations between countries. We are witnessing the creation of a union, a military union that is being created in the region, ”Erekat said.

See also  After all, the Galapagos tortoise is not extinct

Meanwhile, Iran said on Saturday that Bahrain’s move meant it would be complicit in Israeli policies that threaten regional security, Iranian state television reported. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards said Bahrain would face “brutal revenge” from its own people and Palestinians for the actions of the Gulf State.

Turkey also condemned the deal, saying it undermines the Palestinian cause and “will give Israel courage to continue its illegal actions … and attempts to make the occupation of the Palestinian territories permanent.”

Bahraisans, who opposed their government’s agreement to establish diplomatic relations with Israel, expressed their disappointment on social media Saturday, highlighting the difficulties of rapprochement between the Gulf countries. with Israel

The hashtags #Bahrainis_against_normalisation and #NormalizationIsBetrayal went viral on Twitter after Trump announced the deal late Friday night.

Bahrain, a Sunni-ruled kingdom with a large Shiite population, shares a deep enmity with Israel with Iran and relies on the United States to deploy its Fifth Fleet in a tiny but strategic archipelago.

Palestinians carry placards during a protest in Rafah in southern Gaza on Saturday [Said Khatib/AFP]

‘Black day’

Bahraini Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid al-Zayani said the deal represents a historic step towards peace in the Middle East, but the PA and Hamas condemned it as “another stab in the back” of the Arab government.

Unlike the UAE, opposition to normalization is deeply rooted in Bahrain, which has a history of open politics, even if it has been suppressed over the past 10 years.

Former MP Ali Alaswad wrote that it was “a rainy day in the history of Bahrain.”

The kingdom – a small archipelago nestled between regional rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran – has been hit by waves of unrest since 2011, when security forces suppressed Shia protests demanding reform.

See also  Venezuela is ready to supply oil to Europe, but with an advance payment - Obozrevatel

Opposition group Al-Wefaq has criticized the deal to normalize relations.

“The agreement between the despotic regime in Bahrain and the Zionist occupation government is a complete betrayal of Islam and Arabism and a departure from Islamic, Arab and national consensus,” reads a tweet.

Other opposition groups based in Bahrain and abroad have expressed their anger in statements sent to the media, calling the deal “shameful.”

‘Deteriorating unity’

Sari Nusseibe, former top OOP official, said the Palestinian leadership “very upset”.

“But I don’t think they are more upset with the Arab world as a whole than in the past. Palestinians have always complained that the Arab world did not support them as they should, ”he said. Nusseibeh.

The Palestinian cause has already become less central as the region has been rocked by a wave of Arab events, the war in Syria and a bloody attack by the armed group ISIS (ISIS).

At the same time, animosity has grown between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

“The Arab world has had all kinds of problems – disputes, revolutions, civil wars, tensions between various Arab countries,” said Palestinian analyst Ghassan Khatib. “The Palestinians are now paying the price for the deterioration of Arab unity.”

The PA supports the validity of the so-called “Arab consensus” and rejects the idea of ​​its isolation. For a long time, there has been a consensus that Arab states will normalize relations only if Israel fulfills a number of conditions.

One of the demands is that Israel withdraw from the territories it occupied in the 1967 Six Day War.

Another is to agree to the creation of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, and the third is to find a just solution for the millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants.

See also  Ukrainian special services intercepted a call from a Russian officer - Observer

“We hope the Arab countries remain committed to this consensus,” said Jibril Rajoub, a senior Palestinian official, adding that deviating from it “will get you nowhere.”

“Those who violate the Arab consensus … will be isolated in the long run,” he warned.

Protest in Gaza

Palestinians condemn Israeli-Bahrain normalization in Gaza [Mahmud Hams/AFP]

Choice of parties

One Western diplomat, who asked to remain anonymous, agreed that at the moment “the Palestinians really have no choice.”

“They are also stuck because of those who want to support their cause, be it Turkey or Iran.”

Iran already has relations with Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, while relations with the PA are somewhat cooler.

The Palestinian cause has also received support from Turkey, a regional power that is increasingly at odds with Israel and militarily supports a faction that rivals the UAE and Egypt in the war in Libya.

“Turkey really has ambitions to lead this case, and it points to the hypocrisy of both the Arab states and the West, which do not pay enough attention to this issue,” said Gallia Lindenstrauss of the Israel National Institute for Security Studies.

Rajoub insisted: “We do not ignore any country. Turkey is a regional superpower, it is an Islamic country, and we are on good terms. We will continue to cooperate with everyone. “

But Khatib argued that the Palestinians should keep their distance. “It is unwise for Palestinians to fall into the trap of regional tensions and competition between regional superpowers,” he said.

“If you side with Iran, you will lose Saudi Arabia. If you side with Turkey, you will lose someone else. The Palestinians are better off keeping a safe distance from these various regional superpowers. ”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Vladimir Putin has delayed the invasion of Ukraine at least three times.

Published

on

Putin has repeatedly consulted with Russian Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu about the invasion, Europa Press told Ukraine’s chief intelligence director Vadim Skibitsky.

According to Skibitsky, it was the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), which is responsible for counterintelligence and espionage work, that put pressure on Gerasimov and other military agencies to agree to launch an offensive. .

However, according to the Ukrainian intelligence services, the FSB considered that by the end of February sufficient preparations had already been made to guarantee the success of the Russian Armed Forces in a lightning invasion.

However, according to Kyiv, the Russian General Staff provided the Russian troops with supplies and ammunition for only three days, hoping that the offensive would be swift and immediately successful.

The head of Ukrainian intelligence also emphasized the cooperation of local residents, who always provided the Ukrainian authorities with up-to-date information about the Russian army, such as the number of soldiers or the exact location of troops.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

See also  Coronavirus: "We must act" to prevent re-blocking, the prime minister said

Continue Reading

World

Life sentence for former Swedish official for spying for Russia

Published

on

A Stockholm court on Monday sentenced a former Swedish intelligence officer to life in prison for spying for Russia, and his brother to at least 12 years in prison. In what is considered one of the most serious cases in Swedish counterintelligence history, much of the trial took place behind closed doors in the name of national security.

According to the prosecution, it was Russian military intelligence, the GRU, who took advantage of the information provided by the two brothers between 2011 and their arrest at the end of 2021.

Peyman Kia, 42, has held many senior positions in the Swedish security apparatus, including the army and his country’s intelligence services (Säpo). His younger brother, Payam, 35, is accused of “participating in the planning” of the plot and of “managing contacts with Russia and the GRU, including passing on information and receiving financial rewards.”

Both men deny the charges, and their lawyers have demanded an acquittal on charges of “aggravated espionage,” according to the Swedish news agency TT.

The trial coincides with another case of alleged Russian espionage, with the arrest of the Russian-born couple in late November in a suburb of Stockholm by a police team arriving at dawn in a Blackhawk helicopter.

Research website Bellingcat identified them as Sergei Skvortsov and Elena Kulkova. The couple allegedly acted as sleeper agents for Moscow, having moved to Sweden in the late 1990s.

According to Swedish press reports, the couple ran companies specializing in the import and export of electronic components and industrial technology.

See also  MNE denies Russia and says there are no data on the deaths of Portuguese fighters in Ukraine

The man was again detained at the end of November for “illegal intelligence activities.” His partner, suspected of being an accomplice, has been released but remains under investigation.

According to Swedish authorities, the arrests are not related to the trial of the Kia brothers.

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine admitted that Russia may announce a general mobilization

Published

on

“They can strengthen their positions. We understand that this can happen. At the same time, we do not rule out that they will announce a general mobilization,” Danilov said in an interview with the Ukrainska Pravda online publication.

Danilov believed that this mobilization would also be convened “to exterminate as many as possible” of Russian citizens, so that “they would no longer have any problems on their territory.”

In this sense, Danilov also reminded that Russia has not given up on securing control over Kyiv or the idea of ​​the complete “destruction” of Ukraine. “We have to be ready for anything,” he said.

“I want everyone to understand that [os russos] they have not given up on the idea of ​​destroying our nation. If they don’t have Kyiv in their hands, they won’t have anything in their hands, we must understand this,” continued Danilov, who also did not rule out that a new Russian offensive would come from “Belarus and other territories.” .

As such, Danilov praised the decision of many of its residents who chose to stay in the Ukrainian capital when the war broke out in order to defend the city.

“They expected that there would be panic, that people would run, that there would be nothing to protect Kyiv,” he added, referring to President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

See also  Estonia says buying high-precision missile launchers 'makes Russia nervous' - Newsroom

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The Russian invasion, justified by Russian President Vladimir Putin on the need to “denazify” and demilitarize Ukraine for Russia’s security, was condemned by the international community at large, which responded by sending weapons to Ukraine and imposing political and economic sanctions on Russia.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

Continue Reading

Trending