Sulzberger also said that Jim Dao, a deputy editor of the editorial page who had publicly assumed responsibility for supervising the manuscript, would step down from the letter head and be moved to the newsroom. Katie Kingsbury, deputy editor of another editorial page, will oversee the editorial page through the 2020 election.
Tectonic restructuring closed a week of turmoil in state records, with staff involved in debates about the publication of Cotton that was op-ed and grilling The Times’s leadership of the process that led to it.
“Although this was a painful week throughout the company, it has triggered an urgent and important conversation,” Sulzberger wrote to employees in a memo announcing the changes.
A piece of Cotton, published Wednesday under the title “Send Soldiers,” argues that the Rebellion Act could be used to mobilize militaries across the country to help local law enforcement with riots triggered by George Floyd’s death.
The op-ed was published in the opinion section of The Times, but staff from both opinions and the newsroom – which operate separately from each other – publicly disagreed.
Bennet initially defended the op-ed, but later said it was wrong to publish it and blamed failure in the editorial process for the error.
“Last week we saw a significant disruption in our editing process, not the first we have experienced in recent years,” Sulzberger said in a Sunday memo, referring to another major turmoil that has been seen by the opinion section under Bennet’s leadership. “James and I agreed that a new team would be needed to lead the department through a period of considerable change.”
Bennet initially defended the op-ed, but later said it was wrong to publish it and blamed failure in the editorial process for the error.
Sulzberger’s announcement that Bennet would leave staff shocked, people familiar with internal conversations at The Times told CNN Business.
One Times staff said the episode had encouraged meaningful talk about systemic racial bias and diversity in the editorial room. The person said such conversations had gone deeper than just ensuring diverse staff and had been on greater issues about race and The Times’s role in society.
At the town hall with employees on Friday, Sulzberger and Bennet both said the operation process was inadequate at the moment and had structural problems, someone who was on the phone told CNN Business.
“Last week we saw a significant disruption in our editing process, not the first we have experienced in recent years,”
Sulzberger writes on Sundays, referencing another major disaster that occurred in the opinion section under Bennet’s leadership. “James and I agreed that a new team would be needed to lead the department through a period of considerable change.”
Bennet’s tenure has been marked by a series of major mistakes.
The Times’s opinion section was left shaken in September after fumbling with stories about alleged sexual violations against Chief Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Vertical opinions faced the heat of last summer for the action of columnist Bret Stephens.
And last April, the opinion section apologized after publishing an anti-Semitic cartoon in its international edition.
The latest disaster resulted in criticism from Republicans who argued that the newspaper showed bias towards them.
Cotton sharply criticized The Times for saying its op-ed did not meet standards, noting that Bennet initially defended op-ed. Cotton told Fox News that the newspaper had surrendered to the “hordes of children who had awakened.”
“My operation does not meet New York Times standards,” Cotton said. “That far exceeds the standard of those who are usually full of left-wing crap, sophomoric.”
President Trump on Sunday responded to the news by attacking the newspaper in a tweet.