After the defeat suffered by the PEC print vote in a special commission that analyzed the topic, the president’s allies Chamber of Deputies, Arthur Lyra (PP-AL) Please note that this issue should not be brought up in plenary. Parliamentarians heard Young frying pan they argue that the chamber commander will be weakened if he insists on putting forward a proposal that is even denied by the parties that form the basis of support for the presidential government. Jair Bolsonaro… For a supporter of the lyre, pushing for a change in the country’s voting system at this time would mean dragging the Legislature into the epicenter of an institutional crisis affecting the judiciary and legislature. Therefore, according to the Allies, if the Centrão leader is confident that the text will not pass, he will back down.

On Thursday evening, the 5th, the report of MP Filipe Barros (PSL-PR) was rejected by 23 votes to 11. According to the MPs, the commission is a kind of microcosm of reality, that is, if there were no votes. in favor of the PEC in the special commission, the issue should be rejected at the plenary session with an even more expressive margin. In a collegial vote, PSL, PP, Republicans, PTB, PSC and Podemos voted to change the voting system. Together they make up 158 deputies. On the other hand, PT, PL, PSD, MDB, PSDB, PSB, DEM, Solidarity, PSOL, PCdoB, PV, Rede, PDT, Patriota, and Novo rejected this proposal – subtitling unites 328 parliamentarians. Since this is an amendment to the Constitution, 308 votes are needed in two rounds. After that, the matter will go to the Senate, where 49 votes are required, also two votes.

“Yesterday’s decision does not mean that the opposition overthrew the government’s PEC. Most of the 23 deputies who voted against supporting the government’s policy are grassroots. In other words: the position of the majority has been formed. Parliament is concerned about the country’s stability. There is nothing that could justify attacks on the legitimacy of the electoral process, ”he said. Young frying pan MP Orlando Silva (PCdoB-SP), Full Commissioner. “I am convinced that he will not go before the plenary session. This would mean adding gasoline to the flames of the crisis. Knowing Arthur Lear, I know that he is aware of the scale of his position and is working to stabilize the situation in the country, ”he added.

MP Fabio Trad (PSD-MS), another commissioner, supports the MP’s version of PCdoB. “If this [o texto ser levado ao plenário] In such a case, there will likely be a majority due to rejection, even more widespread than that observed in collegial voting. The 23-11 scoreboard showed that it was not a timid victory. The result is impressive, in the sense that the parties, including the basic ones, do not want a printed vote. Even because the experts of the Federal Police themselves have confirmed that the urn is trustworthy, there has never been a monk, ”he said in the report. Trud also states that the panel members are defending that the rapporteur responsible for drafting the new opinion, this time contrary to a print vote, recommends that the proposal be rejected and deferred. “These are two terms that we need to refute,” he summed up. As young Pan showedMP Junior Mano (PL-CE) declined to report due to political pressure. The choice of a new name is the prerogative of Group President Paulo Eduardo Martins (PSC-PR).

Vice President of the Chamber of Deputies Marcelo Ramos (PL-AM) insists that the Chamber take a final position on this issue as soon as possible. According to the parliamentarian, keeping the PEC on the agenda would give President Jair Bolsonar an opportunity to further radicalize his speech. “This decision needs to be made as soon as possible so that we can spend energy on what really matters: the vaccine in hand, food on the plate and work for our people. Continuing discussion of this proposal opens up space for [Bolsonaro] Raising the tone forces Parliament to waste energy on an issue that has already been rejected and holds a flag that has little commitment to democracy, ”Ramos said. “If you go to the plenary session, you will lose. And it loses ugly. Only pocket members and MPs from the PP voted “for”. This is a vote that has split the backbone of the government and demonstrates that the president of the republic is wrong. It would be very bad for the President to go to the plenary session on this issue and suffer a resounding defeat. This can cause discomfort at the base and have consequences for other cases, ”he concluded.