Connect with us

World

“I also consider myself stupid! If you don’t want to be with someone, give it up, and that’s it! “

Published

on



Although this expression was coined in 2006 by American activist Tarana Burke, it was only in October 2017 that the hashtag “Me too” was spread to all corners of the world by American actress and producer Alyssa Milano after posting on her Twitter: “If every woman sexually harassed writes “Me too” in your state, perhaps people will understand the magnitude of the problem, ”she wrote ten days after The New York Times published an article titled“ Harvey Weinstein Paid to Address Sexual Harassment Complaints. ” The truth is that public condemnations of dozens of women who accused the producer of stalking them saved Burke’s line, causing an avalanche that took over a hundred famous names in Hollywood, as was the case with Gwyneth Paltrow, Ashley Judd, Jennifer Lawrence, etc. Uma Thurman and she encouraged many other anonymous women in all parts of the world who somehow already felt themselves to be victims of this type of aggression to speak up.

THE GREAT VICTORY OF THE MOVEMENT The idea behind the tweet was to encourage women to show solidarity with each other, especially when it comes to cases of sexual harassment. The weight and proportions of the mechanism were such that such big names in the Hollywood industry as Ben Affleck, James Franco, Jamie Foxx, Michael Douglas, Morgan Freeman and many others began to be mentioned.

Two months later, Time magazine named women and men who denounced harassment cases “Person of the Year”, congratulating them on “breaking the silence” and “influencing” their anger on sexual assault around the world.

See also  Energy crisis. The same Macron who says no to the relationship said yes in Lisbon, Costa replies

70 women accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault to one degree or another – four people accused him of rape, including Rose McGowan. The producer has been serving a 23-year prison sentence for sexual assault in New York since last year, and on July 20 he was transferred to Los Angeles, where he will have to answer for other alleged sex crimes against five women in a second trial. up to 140 years in prison, outside of New York.

“I AM A MOVEMENT IDIOT TOO” But while few women admit that they do not identify with the movement (perhaps they are also out of fear of condemnation), there are examples of famous names in music, film or literature who have done so without fear of reprisals. The most recent case is the pianist Yujia Wang, who went from being a child prodigy in China to a famous classical music star in the United States. In an interview with the Spanish newspaper El País, where the artist admits that she spent most of the pandemic without touching and that she has already given up understanding of American politics, Wang is also asked about her vision of the Me Too feminist movement and how it meets in the world of classical music. “About this and other culturally related racial movements, I want to say that I will not grieve or blame others for my own misfortune. It is sad. My biggest regret is what happened to director Woody Allen, the pursuit of him. We can’t even watch your last movie in America! “, – answered the artist, defending that this is how the doors to culture are closed, and admitting that this reminds her of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. “I think this step is idiotic! If you do not want to be with someone – give up and that’s it! I really don’t know if I should say this! “, – he concluded.

See also  Italian mafia members sentenced to decades in prison

“KIND OF PURITANISM” In 2018, French actress and beauty icon Catherine Deneuve already shared her views on the feminist movement with the public in an open letter titled “We Defend Freedom of Persecution, Indispensable for Sexual Freedom,” published in the French newspaper Le Monde. and written by about 100 women, including writers, artists and scholars such as the French curator, art critic and writer Catherine Millet and the German singer and film actress Ingrit Caven.

In the letter, female personalities argued that “rape is a crime,” but that “persistent or uncomfortable flirting is not a crime, and flirting is not sexist aggression,” classifying the #MeToo movement as a kind of “puritanism”. 100 women denounce anti-sexual harassment movements as “totalitarian” and “repressive,” which ultimately lead to a “witch hunt” in which a wave of “fast-track justice” becomes public and condemns personal and personal experiences. The text says that “the public accusation campaign put people who made mistakes from time to time into the same category as sex offenders, while the only thing they did was touch their knee, tried to steal a kiss, talked about “Intimate” things at dinner. work, or sending messages with sexual connotations to a woman whose feelings were not mutual. “

The signatories also believe that the reach of the movement “suppresses the sexual expression and freedom of every person.” After describing publishers’ requests to make male characters “less sexist” and a Swedish bill that requires people to explicitly consent before engaging in sex, women write: “A little more and two adults who want to sleep together will first have to check on their mobile an application for participation that details the methods that everyone accepts or rejects. ” One of the authors’ arguments is that instead of empowering women, the #MeToo movement and the #BalanceTonPorc movement in France serve the interests of “enemies of sexual freedom, religious extremists, the worst reactionaries” and those who believe that women are “separate beings, children who look like adults, requiring protection. ” According to the text, “a woman can lead a professional team on the same day and enjoy being a” man’s sexual object “without being a” slutty woman “or” a dastardly complicit in the patriarchy. “

See also  The Prime Minister of Finland danced at a private party, and the opposition does not forgive it | celebrities

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Vladimir Putin has delayed the invasion of Ukraine at least three times.

Published

on

Putin has repeatedly consulted with Russian Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu about the invasion, Europa Press told Ukraine’s chief intelligence director Vadim Skibitsky.

According to Skibitsky, it was the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), which is responsible for counterintelligence and espionage work, that put pressure on Gerasimov and other military agencies to agree to launch an offensive. .

However, according to the Ukrainian intelligence services, the FSB considered that by the end of February sufficient preparations had already been made to guarantee the success of the Russian Armed Forces in a lightning invasion.

However, according to Kyiv, the Russian General Staff provided the Russian troops with supplies and ammunition for only three days, hoping that the offensive would be swift and immediately successful.

The head of Ukrainian intelligence also emphasized the cooperation of local residents, who always provided the Ukrainian authorities with up-to-date information about the Russian army, such as the number of soldiers or the exact location of troops.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

See also  British Army commander: 'We must be ready to fight in Europe'

Continue Reading

World

Life sentence for former Swedish official for spying for Russia

Published

on

A Stockholm court on Monday sentenced a former Swedish intelligence officer to life in prison for spying for Russia, and his brother to at least 12 years in prison. In what is considered one of the most serious cases in Swedish counterintelligence history, much of the trial took place behind closed doors in the name of national security.

According to the prosecution, it was Russian military intelligence, the GRU, who took advantage of the information provided by the two brothers between 2011 and their arrest at the end of 2021.

Peyman Kia, 42, has held many senior positions in the Swedish security apparatus, including the army and his country’s intelligence services (Säpo). His younger brother, Payam, 35, is accused of “participating in the planning” of the plot and of “managing contacts with Russia and the GRU, including passing on information and receiving financial rewards.”

Both men deny the charges, and their lawyers have demanded an acquittal on charges of “aggravated espionage,” according to the Swedish news agency TT.

The trial coincides with another case of alleged Russian espionage, with the arrest of the Russian-born couple in late November in a suburb of Stockholm by a police team arriving at dawn in a Blackhawk helicopter.

Research website Bellingcat identified them as Sergei Skvortsov and Elena Kulkova. The couple allegedly acted as sleeper agents for Moscow, having moved to Sweden in the late 1990s.

According to Swedish press reports, the couple ran companies specializing in the import and export of electronic components and industrial technology.

See also  The Prime Minister of Finland danced at a private party, and the opposition does not forgive it | celebrities

The man was again detained at the end of November for “illegal intelligence activities.” His partner, suspected of being an accomplice, has been released but remains under investigation.

According to Swedish authorities, the arrests are not related to the trial of the Kia brothers.

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine admitted that Russia may announce a general mobilization

Published

on

“They can strengthen their positions. We understand that this can happen. At the same time, we do not rule out that they will announce a general mobilization,” Danilov said in an interview with the Ukrainska Pravda online publication.

Danilov believed that this mobilization would also be convened “to exterminate as many as possible” of Russian citizens, so that “they would no longer have any problems on their territory.”

In this sense, Danilov also reminded that Russia has not given up on securing control over Kyiv or the idea of ​​the complete “destruction” of Ukraine. “We have to be ready for anything,” he said.

“I want everyone to understand that [os russos] they have not given up on the idea of ​​destroying our nation. If they don’t have Kyiv in their hands, they won’t have anything in their hands, we must understand this,” continued Danilov, who also did not rule out that a new Russian offensive would come from “Belarus and other territories.” .

As such, Danilov praised the decision of many of its residents who chose to stay in the Ukrainian capital when the war broke out in order to defend the city.

“They expected that there would be panic, that people would run, that there would be nothing to protect Kyiv,” he added, referring to President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

See also  Italian mafia members sentenced to decades in prison

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The Russian invasion, justified by Russian President Vladimir Putin on the need to “denazify” and demilitarize Ukraine for Russia’s security, was condemned by the international community at large, which responded by sending weapons to Ukraine and imposing political and economic sanctions on Russia.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

Continue Reading

Trending