President Donald Trump says he has listened to Democratic managing mate Kamala Harris “doesn’t qualify” to serve as US vice-president, amplifying a fringe legal theory critics decry as racist.

Ms Harris was born to a Jamaican father and Indian mother in Oakland, California, on 20 October 1964.

But a conservative law professor has questioned her eligibility.

For decades, Mr Trump promoted a false “birther” concept that President Barack Obama was not born in the US.

Ms Harris, a California senator, was unveiled on Tuesday as the 1st woman of color to provide as jogging mate on a most important-party US presidential ticket.

She is deputy to Democratic White House candidate Joe Biden, who will problem Mr Trump, a Republican, in November’s standard election.

What did Trump say?

At Thursday’s push convention, Mr Trump was requested about the argument in opposition to Ms Harris.

The president mentioned: “I just heard it currently that she does not meet up with the specifications and by the way the lawyer that wrote that piece is a pretty highly certified, pretty proficient lawyer.

Media playback is unsupported on your machine

“I have no plan if which is ideal. I would have assumed the Democrats would have checked that out ahead of she gets selected to operate for vice-president.

“But that is a extremely significant, you might be indicating that, they are indicating that she isn’t going to qualify due to the fact she wasn’t born in this place.”

The reporter replied there was no question that Ms Harris was born in the US, just that her mom and dad could possibly not have been lawful long-lasting citizens at that time.

Previously on Thursday, a Trump marketing campaign adviser, Jenna Ellis, reposted a tweet from the head of conservative team Judicial Enjoy, Tim Fitton.

Media playback is unsupported on your unit

In that tweet, Mr Fitton questioned whether Ms Harris was “ineligible to be Vice President under the US Constitution’s ‘Citizenship Clause'”.

He also shared an viewpoint piece printed in Newsweek journal by John Eastman, a regulation professor at Chapman University in California.

What is the regulation professor’s argument?

Prof Eastman cites Report II of the US Constitution’s wording that “no particular person besides a all-natural born citizen… shall be suitable to the office environment of President”.

He also details out that the 14th Modification to the Constitution suggests “all folks born… in the United States, and topic to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens”.

Media playback is unsupported on your unit

Prof Eastman’s argument hinges on the strategy that Ms Harris may possibly not have been subject to US jurisdiction if her parents ended up, for case in point, on university student visas at the time of their daughter’s beginning in California.

In 2010, Prof Eastman ran to be the Republican prospect for California attorney basic. He dropped to Steve Cooley, who went on to be defeated by Ms Harris in the normal election.

Next furious backlash to the Newsweek op-ed, its editor-in-chief Nancy Cooper stood by the choice to publish, arguing on Thursday that Prof Eastman’s report experienced “nothing at all to do with racist birtherism”. 

What do other constitutional experts say?

A further constitutional legislation qualified informed CBS Information, the BBC’s US companion, that Prof Eastman’s argument about Ms Harris’ eligibility was “truly foolish”.

Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of Berkeley Regulation University, wrote in an e-mail: “Less than section 1 of the 14th Amendment, any person born in the United States is a United States citizen.

“The Supreme Court docket has held this due to the fact the 1890s. Kamala Harris was born in the United States.”

Laurence Tribe, a constitutional regulation professor at Harvard University and recurrent critic of President Trump, identified as Prof Eastman’s argument “rubbish” and “racist birtherism redux”.

Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law University, explained to the Linked Push information agency: “Let’s just be sincere about what it is: It is just a racist trope we trot out when we have a applicant of color whose parents were being not citizens.”

How did Trump gasoline the Obama ‘birther’ principle?

Again in 2011 Mr Trump commenced stoking appropriate-wing theories that President Obama could possibly have been born in Kenya.

Even when Mr Obama made a copy of his delivery certification in April that 12 months demonstrating he was born in Hawaii, Mr Trump continued to claim it was a “fraud”.

All through a September 2016 press convention Mr Trump, then the Republican White Property candidate, was requested about the subject.

He sought to choose credit rating for dispelling doubts about Mr Obama’s eligibility, telling reporters: “I concluded it. President Obama was born in the United States. Period of time.”

Mr Trump also argued in 2016 that his election rival Ted Cruz was not qualified to operate for president due to the fact he was born in Canada to a US citizen mother and a Cuban-born father.