Top News

Sir Isaac Newton considered curing the plague with a lozenges, a manuscript revealed

Published

on

In a previously unpublished two-page manuscript dating from 1667, Newton wrote that in order to cure the plague, “the best is a frog suspended by feet in a chimney for three days, which eventually spewed the earth with various insects in it, upwards. A plate yellow candle, and shortly after death. ”

“Combining powdered frogs with excretion and serum is made into lozenges and is used in the affected area, expels transmission and expels toxins,” Newton noted in the document.

“I think of course that the current medical situation has an impact on people’s interest to read about its history,” Darren Sutherland, a senior specialist in books and manuscripts at Bonham, told CNN.

The writing also refers to using stones such as sapphire and amber as “zenexton,” or amulets, against disease, among more worldly observations such as “places infected with Plague must be avoided.”

Newton noted this when studying the work of Jan Baptiste Van Helmont, a famous chemist in the 17th century and a leading medical scientist who practiced at the time. Van Helmont died in 1644. Among his most important contributions was that he first identified the presence of gases such as carbon dioxide, and he coined the term “gas.”

RELATED: Hunters in China catch bubonic plague after eating wild rabbits

Although Newton was largely interested in learning about chemistry from Van Helmont, he also focused his attention on a book written by Van Helmont about the plague, “Tumulus Pestis” (“Tomb of the Plague”), based on his experience healing patients in Antwerp in 1605, according to Bonhams research.

It is no coincidence that in 1667, Newton developed an interest in learning about the plague.

An estimated 100,000 people died from illness in London between 1665 and 1666, according to Britain National Archives. Newton himself famously spent two years in quarantine at Woolsthorpe Manor, his family’s estate in Lincolnshire, after he had to leave his studies at Cambridge. Newton’s account of the plague was probably written shortly after he was able to return to Cambridge.

“There must have been some kind of spark of interest at the time, just for his intelligence. While medicine was never the focus, I think there was a personal interest in this particular subject at the time,” Sutherland said.

Using vomit frogs or gemstones to cure plague does sound kooky today, but Newton “is not an outcast in the context of the 17th century,” Sutherland said.

The mention of frog charms and gemstones by Newton as a possible remedy for the outbreak did not surprise Elisabeth Brander, a rare book librarian at the Becker Medical Library, he told CNN.

“We usually associate it with what we consider to be very modern and forward-looking science, but when it was still alive, the lines between what we now consider science and superstition are far, far more blurrier.”

RELATED: Humans have the ability ‘like a salamander’ to grow cartilage, the study found

According to Brander, Van Helmont’s frog healing came from the teachings of Paracelsus, a Swiss doctor who lived in the 16th century.

Paracelsus “believes that the outbreak was caused by celestial disorders in the body and that wearing certain amulets can help disrupt the damaging relationship between the body and the stars,” Brander told CNN.

“We have since moved away from the idea of ​​the sympathetic forces that created certain disturbances in the physical body, but that made sense in the early modern period. Newton was in the middle of this transition period where the body of scientific knowledge was still in flux, which was very interesting, “he added.

Distinguishing between Newton’s scientific achievements and his reflections on frogs and gemstones is only possible for us as contemporary observers, with the benefit of looking back.

The 17th century was a time when many scientific discoveries that we now understand as the mainstream were first conceptualized and defined. Even ideas such as gravity, which are fully established today, take years to flow into general knowledge after Newton first formulated them, according to Sutherland.

“Important moments in our history are not important at this time,” Sutherland added.

Click to comment

Trending

Exit mobile version