Roots of Radicalization in Political Debates

Throughout the history of Brazil, we have come a long way towards the strengthening of national identity and with it the realization of interdependence, which should unite us in building our destiny.

These postulates emphasize a fundamental aspect of any civilized society: the preservation of coexistence. All existing rules are aimed at maintaining peaceful relations between people, environmental sustainability, overcoming social inequality, seeking justice and social harmony. There is a strong sense of utopia, which, as filmmaker Fernando Birri taught, “Utopia is on the horizon. I go two steps, she takes two steps. I walk ten paces and the horizon runs ten paces. How much I go, I will never reach. What is a utopia for? That’s what it’s for: so I don’t stop walking.”

Ethics, Inclusion and Diversity

Living in society implies the recognition and the need to preserve our relationships, the constant promotion of ethics, inclusiveness, diversity, positions that have recently been valued in the corporate environment, with the adoption of ESG metrics that unite companies, and finally, the protection of human rights.

However, actions aimed at strengthening coexistence are under threat. Political debate is witnessing a radicalization that distances understanding, opposing opinions are virulently attacked without reference to argumentation, and a culture of abolition is proliferating. The opposite is not an adversary, but an enemy.

Historical roots of radicalization

This environment is deeply rooted in our history. The disrespect for rights is widespread, sponsored by government officials and supported by a part of society, which is becoming increasingly suspicious, according to a global survey conducted by the Ipsos Institute.

A study published by the journal Veja shows that when asked “Do you trust others?” is 22,500 people in thirty countries, Brazil is in last place.

Corruption scandals, a sense of impunity that poisons the whole society, deep inequalities and, of course, difficulties in enforcing the most basic consumer rights are clearly harming our coexistence. Yes, our past and what we live in the present is not encouraging, but they can serve as fuel to change the future.

Utopia and dialogue

Remembering that our mutual dependence is a reality that must mean union, and that it is possible to overcome our countless difficulties through dialogue, tolerance, without submission. This way we can ask questions and find ways. Utopia? Perhaps, but as Birri taught, this must be our way.