Resource Offer – PC AL – Portuguese

Dear Students,

With the posting of the preliminary review by the organizer, I see an opportunity for resources on two issues.

Below is my written proposal for this review request. It’s important to not just copy and paste. Please substantiate my arguments and write the text in your own words, okay?

Strong hugs and success!

Jose Maria

Professor Jose Maria
– Instagram: @professorjosemaria
– Telegram: t.me/professorjosemaria
– YouTube: / Professorjosemaria

Dear Students,

With the posting of the preliminary review by the organizer, I see an opportunity for resources in the release.

Below is my written proposal for this review request. It’s important to not just copy and paste. Please substantiate my arguments and write the text in your own words, okay?

Strong hugs and success!

Jose Maria

Professor Jose Maria
– Instagram: @professorjosemaria
– Telegram: t.me/professorjosemaria
– YouTube: / Professorjosemaria

Pre-pattern: RIGHT

Resource proposal:

In the original construction – “the relationship of the police forces with society” – the term “police forces” plays the role of an auxiliary complement – it is the agent of relations; the term “with the community” acts as a nominal complement — it is the purpose of the relationship. In terms of meaning, it mentions how the police force relates to the community. Thus, he assesses how the police are treating the community.

In the proposal for amending the text – “the relationship between the police and the community” – the preposition “between” creates the effect of reciprocity. In terms of meaning, it mentions not only how the police treat the community, but also how the community treats the police force. Thus, it assesses how the police treat the community and how the community interacts with the police.

Comparing the two essays, he sees a subtle change in meaning, that is, the original information in the text will not be preserved.

However, I am asking to change the template to WRONG.

Preliminary template: WRONG

Resource proposal:

The text reads: “… in other cases it is absolutely impossible to come to a single and final conclusion …”.

Please note that in this passage there is a main clause “this is completely impossible” and a significant subordinate clause “to come to an unambiguous and final conclusion.” This can be evidenced by the consecrated rewriting: “in others it is absolutely impossible.”

Please note that the pronominal form ISTO performs the function of the subject, that is, the sentence “reaching an unambiguous and final conclusion” is a sentence the subject – in technical terms, the subjective clause is essential subjective.

Thus, the aforementioned sentence introduced by the verb “arrive” does indeed act as a subject.

This is discovered, I am asking to change the template to CERTO.