Miguel Braga, responsible for communication in Sporting, has strengthened criticism of the Disciplinary College considering the difference in the criteria for the bet with Uribe (FC Porto), which occurred last season, after Pepe’s case was postponed… “I understand that we must respect the principle of referee authority, but we must remember that VAR itself exists to help the referee not make mistakes – we all want perfect judges without mistakes. Do not use technology in one. In case of fairness, I cannot understand. Not wanting to punish aggressive behavior of this kind that got into the eyes of the referee and the VAR … I don’t understand either. The CD is better to say … “We analyzed it and everything is fine.” In theory, so as not to change the practice. In this case, the practice is not good, beautiful, and should be taught to young people. This was another decision that our Disciplinary Council did not make. satisfied, ”he condemned in statements to the Sporting X-Ray program. Braga assured that the possible re-nomination of Frederico Varandas is a “decision of the president” and reiterated that there is a discrepancy in the criteria for removing players.
“We shouldn’t compare the case of Neto [expulso em Barcelos] in the case of Pepe, because Neto was expelled and Pepe was not. Pepe’s case… The CD missed the opportunity to educate and explain to the public, young people, that this attitude should not take place on the pitch, whether or not the referee and VAR saw it; two games against Neto is another matter: you have to compare equal rates. Last year at the Portuguese Cup, Uribe hit Esgaio with his head. They are both regrettable and both are subject to exclusion. The strange thing is that one took one game and the other two, and Neto expressed his regret 20 minutes after the end of the game. There is another criterion. The cruelty of Neto’s application has nothing to do with Uribe’s application – it is incomprehensible, “- confirmed the guilty Lev.
