Connect with us

World

Jacinda Ardern. Confusion around inconsistent biography

Published

on

Less than a week ago, Jacinda Ardern joined the general criticism of the Hollywood film They Are Us, which focused on her response to the attacks on the Christchurch Mosque. The Prime Minister of New Zealand said that the tragedy is too alive to be turned into a cinematic work. Now Ardern has once again distanced himself from the project that revolves around his figure.

Written by activist and journalist Supriya Wani and writer Karl A. Hart, edited by Simon and Schuster, Jacinda Ardern: Leading with Empathy is based on Wani’s exclusive interviews with Ardern.

But there is a problem: As a result of the biography, which mainly documents her leadership style, there should have been a job that involved “about 10 other women political leaders,” the prime minister explained at a press conference last Monday, June 14.

Ardern said Wani “clearly misled her” about the purpose of the interview and the premise of the book, ensuring that she was never informed by a journalist of her intention to write his biography. It was decided, following the 2019 approach, to participate in “exclusive interviews” for a “book on women and political leadership”. “I was told that there were about 10 other women political leaders involved and I agreed to the interview only on this basis, as it did not apply specifically to me,” she added.

In fact, the book’s claims of exclusive interviews with the prime minister have already caused some oddity in New Zealand, as Ardern does not usually give interviews to biographers. Two prominent New Zealand journalists, Madeleine Chapman and Michelle Duff, have written biographies of Ardern, but neither has been able to receive any interviews.

See also  Putin warns of environmental consequences of cutting off Russian energy

In her defense, Hart confirmed in statements to The Guardian that “the original interview was for a book that featured several women leaders.” However, he argues that Prime Minister Ardern was not deceived “because at the time of the interview we had no intention of writing a biography only about her.” Co-author Karl A. Hart also explained that the book’s course was changed in 2020 as a result of the covid-19 pandemic, which ultimately prevented interviews with other world leaders, and because “her story and her exemplary leadership deserve a book.” … Hart added that Ardern knew the scope of the book had changed to a biography, as “in January, Vani informed the Prime Minister’s office of this intention, and the cover of the book was even sent to her advisers.”

FAST FILM? Last week, Ardern was already forced to publicly reveal the film They Are Us, which was due to start production soon and which, despite the March 15, 2019 attacks on the Christchurch Mosque, forced New Zealand’s Prime Minister to protagonize.

The play, in which actress Rose Byrne plays Jacinda Ardern, was announced by the Hollywood Reporter last Friday, June 11, as “an inspiring tale of a young leader’s reaction to tragic events.” The reaction was not as expected, however, and the film was immediately criticized for focusing on the leadership of a white woman amid the massacre of 51 Muslim white supremacists. Many New Zealanders Muslims have criticized this argument as “exploitative”, “insensitive” and “obscene.” The petition to cancel the film’s production has garnered nearly 60,000 signatures in just three days. “There are many stories about March 15 that could be told, but I don’t consider mine to be one of them,” repeated Ardern, denying his involvement in the film.

See also  Russian commercial jet forced to deviate from NATO spy plane - Worldwide

This reaction seems to have convinced producer Phillip Campbell to abandon the project: “I’ve heard concerns expressed in the past few days and I’ve heard the power of people’s opinions. I agree that the events of March 15, 2019 are too harsh for cinema at the moment, and I do not want to get involved with a project that causes so much suffering, ”he explained.

PRIME MINISTER Jacinda Ardern is New Zealand’s third female prime minister and the second youngest leader in the country’s history. He was born in 1980 in New Zealand’s seventh largest city, Hamilton, but grew up in the small rural town of Murupara. Her mother worked in a school cafeteria and her father was a police officer in Morrinsville, which, according to the prime minister, played a crucial role in her “outlook on politics.”

She attended the University of Waikato in 2001, working as a researcher in the office of Prime Minister Helen Clark. She later worked in the UK as an adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair, and in 2008 was elected President of the International Union of Socialist Youth. After passing through the New Zealand Parliament, she was unanimously elected as Deputy Leader of the Labor Party, which she took over in 2017. That same year, the party surpassed its biggest rival, the National Party, and Jacinda took over as prime minister. After just eight months in power, she gave birth to a baby girl, becoming the country’s first head of government to give birth to a child during her term.

He immediately became a symbol of the New Left and women’s emancipation. Its effectiveness in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic has made it even more popular. This year, Fortune magazine ranked her number one among the world’s great leaders for her role in climate and gender equality politics.

See also  Where is the war going? Bakhmut, Svatovo and Kremennaya are obligatory stops. Lack of fuel delays fights – Observer

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Vladimir Putin has delayed the invasion of Ukraine at least three times.

Published

on

Putin has repeatedly consulted with Russian Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu about the invasion, Europa Press told Ukraine’s chief intelligence director Vadim Skibitsky.

According to Skibitsky, it was the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), which is responsible for counterintelligence and espionage work, that put pressure on Gerasimov and other military agencies to agree to launch an offensive. .

However, according to the Ukrainian intelligence services, the FSB considered that by the end of February sufficient preparations had already been made to guarantee the success of the Russian Armed Forces in a lightning invasion.

However, according to Kyiv, the Russian General Staff provided the Russian troops with supplies and ammunition for only three days, hoping that the offensive would be swift and immediately successful.

The head of Ukrainian intelligence also emphasized the cooperation of local residents, who always provided the Ukrainian authorities with up-to-date information about the Russian army, such as the number of soldiers or the exact location of troops.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

See also  Putin warns of environmental consequences of cutting off Russian energy
Continue Reading

World

Life sentence for former Swedish official for spying for Russia

Published

on

A Stockholm court on Monday sentenced a former Swedish intelligence officer to life in prison for spying for Russia, and his brother to at least 12 years in prison. In what is considered one of the most serious cases in Swedish counterintelligence history, much of the trial took place behind closed doors in the name of national security.

According to the prosecution, it was Russian military intelligence, the GRU, who took advantage of the information provided by the two brothers between 2011 and their arrest at the end of 2021.

Peyman Kia, 42, has held many senior positions in the Swedish security apparatus, including the army and his country’s intelligence services (Säpo). His younger brother, Payam, 35, is accused of “participating in the planning” of the plot and of “managing contacts with Russia and the GRU, including passing on information and receiving financial rewards.”

Both men deny the charges, and their lawyers have demanded an acquittal on charges of “aggravated espionage,” according to the Swedish news agency TT.

The trial coincides with another case of alleged Russian espionage, with the arrest of the Russian-born couple in late November in a suburb of Stockholm by a police team arriving at dawn in a Blackhawk helicopter.

Research website Bellingcat identified them as Sergei Skvortsov and Elena Kulkova. The couple allegedly acted as sleeper agents for Moscow, having moved to Sweden in the late 1990s.

According to Swedish press reports, the couple ran companies specializing in the import and export of electronic components and industrial technology.

See also  Ghislaine Maxwell Trafficking Jury Delays Sentence Again - Current Events

The man was again detained at the end of November for “illegal intelligence activities.” His partner, suspected of being an accomplice, has been released but remains under investigation.

According to Swedish authorities, the arrests are not related to the trial of the Kia brothers.

Continue Reading

World

Ukraine admitted that Russia may announce a general mobilization

Published

on

“They can strengthen their positions. We understand that this can happen. At the same time, we do not rule out that they will announce a general mobilization,” Danilov said in an interview with the Ukrainska Pravda online publication.

Danilov believed that this mobilization would also be convened “to exterminate as many as possible” of Russian citizens, so that “they would no longer have any problems on their territory.”

In this sense, Danilov also reminded that Russia has not given up on securing control over Kyiv or the idea of ​​the complete “destruction” of Ukraine. “We have to be ready for anything,” he said.

“I want everyone to understand that [os russos] they have not given up on the idea of ​​destroying our nation. If they don’t have Kyiv in their hands, they won’t have anything in their hands, we must understand this,” continued Danilov, who also did not rule out that a new Russian offensive would come from “Belarus and other territories.” .

As such, Danilov praised the decision of many of its residents who chose to stay in the Ukrainian capital when the war broke out in order to defend the city.

“They expected that there would be panic, that people would run, that there would be nothing to protect Kyiv,” he added, referring to President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine caused at least 6.5 million internally displaced persons and more than 7.8 million refugees to European countries, which is why the UN classifies this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945). gg.). ).

See also  Where is the war going? Bakhmut, Svatovo and Kremennaya are obligatory stops. Lack of fuel delays fights – Observer

At the moment, 17.7 million Ukrainians are in need of humanitarian assistance, and 9.3 million are in need of food aid and housing.

The Russian invasion, justified by Russian President Vladimir Putin on the need to “denazify” and demilitarize Ukraine for Russia’s security, was condemned by the international community at large, which responded by sending weapons to Ukraine and imposing political and economic sanctions on Russia.

The UN has presented as confirmed 6,755 civilian deaths and 10,607 wounded since the beginning of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

Continue Reading

Trending