Connect with us


How to respond to “political gaslighting”; read Moses Nain’s column



How to respond to “political gaslighting”;  read Moses Nain's column

At the end of each year since 2003, the American Dictionary Merriam Webster announces your choice of the word of the year in English. According to an authoritative publication founded in 1831, the word of the year for 2022 is gaslighting. According to Peter Sokolowski, editor of the dictionary, the word was the most searched on the internet, with a 1742% increase over the previous year. According to the linguist, it was one of the 50 most popular words of the year.

Gaslighting is a colloquial way of referring to tactics and tricks used to make a person question their own reality and question what they feel, believe, and do. The goal of those who perform this practice is to psychologically weaken the victim in order to influence their perceptions, behaviors and decisions.

The concept of gaslighting was first used in a 1938 play staged in London and New York, which was made into a film in 1940. gas lightit tells the story of a couple in which the husband manipulates the woman for financial gain until she thinks she is going crazy.

Among other tricks, the husband installed a gas lighting system in the house when the woman was alone – hence the name of the film, and, consequently, the practice.

Among the tactics used by these manipulators are constant lies, contradictions, confusion, as well as skepticism about the validity of previously certain truths, as well as their substitution with false narratives. In addition, many attack victims’ self-esteem and feed their insecurities. Hiding information and using false information are also other common tactics.

The word fell out of use throughout the 20th century, and it wasn’t until the 1990s that it began to be used again with some frequency by psychologists and psychiatrists. But the explosive growth in the use of the word, especially on the Internet, is not due to psychoanalysis, but rather to politics, where gaslighting tactics are increasingly being used to shape society’s beliefs.

In fact, gaslighting is directly related to another word Merriam Webster chose as their 2016 phrase of the year: post-truth. That is, the tendency to accept an idea as true, based on emotion rather than reality.

In recent years, it has become commonplace in many countries to be influenced by political groups that scorn data, scientific evidence, and even logic.

His promoters used gaslighting tactics extensively and created a post-truth-dominated majority in public opinion. The infamous case of British Minister Michael Gove, one of the leaders of the Brexit campaign, who, when asked about a study by experts on the detrimental consequences of leaving the European Union for the United Kingdom, replied: “The country is fed up with experts.”

Attempts to influence the opinions and behavior of society – or part of it – are very old. Propaganda has always been an indispensable tool in political disputes. However, these days, the proliferation of lies, post-truths, and gaslighting has gained extraordinary power and toxicity. New communication technologies allow individuals and groups to take on a central role that was previously restricted to governments, parties and companies.

See also  OPEN SPACE: the dream of a strong political group by 2022 can turn into a salvation who can

We have already seen the most ominous symptoms of social media being used to deepen divisions, spread lies, and stir up chaos. It is essential to protect societies from the harmful use of these differences.

Continuation after commercial

For this to be successful, it is a priority to place costs and consequences on both the cybercriminals and those who collaborate with this unacceptable behavior. It is hoped, for example, to see U.S. courts hand down a billionaire verdict to the monstrous figure of Alex Jones, a conspiracy theorist on the website Information warsconvicted of libeling the families of victims of the Sandy Hook massacre.

For this to be successful, it is a priority to place costs and consequences on both the cybercriminals and those who collaborate with this unacceptable behavior.

Similarly, Dominion Voting Systems initiated a very important lawsuit against Fox News, a company that Dominion says questioned the reliability of its voting machines in the 2020 election, in which Donald Trump falsely questioned the outcome of the election.

Recently, the former president himself began to pay the political cost of gaslighting against the whole of society with lies that even led him to defend the suspension of the American constitution. Society can only protect itself from this type of collective gaslighting by imposing financial, legal, and reputational costs. / TRANSLATION BY LUIS RAATZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The dollar continues to reflect the political scenario



The dollar continues to reflect the political scenario

Yesterday, financial agents evaluated the opposite decision of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) regarding the so-called secret budget. In addition, a decision was made by STF Minister Gilmar Méndez to issue an injunction that would exclude the Bolsa Família from the spending cap rule, with investors trying to understand how this measure would affect the processing of the transitional PEC in the Chamber of Deputies. Oh this PEC!!!!

Since he is an exchange investor, any reading that the budget will be exceeded or become more flexible will negatively affect the exchange market, whether through the PEC or in any other way. We will continue with volatility today.

Looking beyond, the US Central Bank (Fed), although slowing down the pace of monetary tightening at its December meeting, issued a tougher-than-expected statement warning that its fight against inflation was not yet over, raising fears that rising US interest rates will push the world’s largest economy into recession.

The currency market continues to react to political news. The voting on the PEC is saved for today. It is expected that it will indeed be reviewed to open the way tomorrow for discussions on the 2023 budget.

Yesterday, the spot price closed the selling day at R$5.3103.

For today on the calendar we will have an index of consumer confidence in the eurozone. Good luck and good luck in business!!

Continue Reading


Andrés Sánchez consults with the Ministry of Sports, but refuses a political post.



The former president of the Corinthians dreams of working for the CBF as a national team coordinator. He was consulted shortly after Lula’s election.

Former Corinthians president Andrés Sánchez was advised to take a position in the Ministry of Sports under the administration of Lula (PT). However, he ruled out a return to politics. dreams of taking over the coordination of CBF selectionHow do you know PURPOSE.

No formal invitation was made to the former Corinthian representative, only a consultation on a portfolio opportunity with the new federal government, which will be sworn in on January 1, 2023.

Andrés was the Federal MP for São Paulo from 2015 to 2019. At that time he was elected by the Workers’ Party. However, the football manager begs to stay in the sport, ruling out the possibility of getting involved in politics again.

Andrés Sanchez’s desire is to fill the position of CBF tackle coordinator, which should become vacant after the 2022 World Cup. Juninho Paulista fulfills this function in Brazil’s top football institution.

The former president of Corinthians was in Qatar to follow the World Cup along with other figures in Brazilian football. During his time in the country, he strengthened his ties with the top leadership of the CBF.

See also  UNITA accuses the Angolan government of "political exploitation" of the death of Eduardo dos Santos
Continue Reading


The EU has reached a political agreement on limiting gas prices – 19.12.2022



Germany sentenced Russian to life imprisonment for political murder by order of Moscow - 12/15/2021
BRUSSELS, DECEMBER 19 (ANSA). European Union countries reached a political agreement on Monday (19) to impose a natural gas price ceiling of 180 euros per megawatt hour (MWh). The main sources of income for Russia and the minimization of the use of energy as a weapon by the regime of Vladimir Putin.

The agreement was approved by a supermajority at a ministerial meeting of member states in Brussels, Belgium, after months of discussions about the best way to contain the rise in natural gas prices in the bloc caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. .

The value set by the countries is well below the proposal made by the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, in November: 275 EUR/MWh. However, the countries leading the cap campaign were in favor of an even lower limit, around 100 EUR/MWh.

Germany, always wary of price controls, voted in favor of 180 euros, while Austria and the Netherlands, also skeptical of the cap, abstained. Hungary, the most pro-Russian country in the EU, voted against.

The instrument will enter into force on 15 February, but only if natural gas prices on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange exceed 180 euros/MWh for three consecutive days. In addition, the difference compared to a number of global benchmarks should be more than 35 euros.

Italy, the EU’s biggest supporter of the ceiling, has claimed responsibility for the measure. “This is a victory for Italy, which believed and worked for us to reach this agreement,” Environment and Energy Minister Gilberto Picetto tweeted.

See also  Judicial Commission approves filing of charges against Mayor of Jaguaro | politics

“This is a victory for Italian and European citizens who demand energy security,” he added.

Currently, the gas price in Amsterdam is around 110 EUR/MWh, which is already a reflection of the agreement in Brussels – in August the figure even broke the barrier of 340 EUR/MWh.

However, Russia has already threatened to stop exports to countries that adhere to the ceiling. (ANSA).

See more news, photos and videos at

Continue Reading