Connect with us

Tech

Comparison with integrated graphics NO! Latest ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC D6 4GB Graphics Card

Published

on

If you have the desire and money to invest enough in beautifying a gaming PC, also known as a gaming PC, then you can create a more fun and high-quality gaming environment if you set it up with high performance. However, it is also true that it is not easy, and many people set up their PCs for gaming in search of a suitable compromise.

Particularly in the case of the graphics card, since it is one of the most important devices for gaming performance, most of them are geared towards high-performance and expensive products, but surprisingly, not all of them are.

This is because quite a few people are satisfied that they can play the game they have enjoyed for a long time without any problems.

That is why the demand for regular entry-level and entry-level graphics cards that show decent performance is constant here.

It also seems that the products that will be featured in this article fall into this category.

This is the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC D6 with 4GB of memory, which NVIDIA first introduced in its entry-level GTX 1630 line about 5 years ago this year, and retail graphics card manufacturer ASUS launched the TUF trademark.

■ entry-level tantalum



Launched this year, the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB is a solid platform overall. The configuration of the external video card is based on two fans.

The black fan doesn’t have much of a design because it’s a base model, but its design gives it a compact and powerful feel with the TUF Gaming logo.

The reason the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB gives the impression of being a solid core is because of its attractive design, but few products offer an entry-level model backplate.

The back panel of the secondary protection board, how to prevent video card distortion and protect the circuit board from foreign materials, but the feeling of stability of what is and what is not, the difference is heavenly.

See also  See how the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket flies over the moon (video)


The ASUS TUF range also values ​​stability. The cooling fan for ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB is entry-level, but it uses a dual ball bearing fan, IP5X dustproof function, and aerospace grade lubricant. When applied, it seems that all attention is directed to noise, etc.


In particular, ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB products do not require a separate PCIe auxiliary power connector.

Therefore, it can be used on low-spec computers that consume 300W class power, so it can be chosen in environments that require good external graphics even if they are not high-end.


In addition, there are general gaming PCs that require an entry-level graphics card, but since there are cases where external graphics are required for office use, a port is also provided for the old office environment.

In most cases, monitors are connected using DP or HDMI, but if you’re using a monitor that’s been around for a while, you may need a DVI port.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB also has a DVI port for these environments.

■ Specification/performance test, FHD testing of popular games


ASUS TUF Gaming If you look at the GPU-Z specifications for the GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB, you will see that this is a product based on the Turing architecture.

The advantage is that while the long-released GTX 1650 uses GDDR5 for graphics memory, the recently released ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB uses GDDR6.

While it’s a little lower on the numerical scale, in terms of performance/detailed specs it’s very close to the feel of the latest GTX 1650.

As I said before, the story of not needing extra power is that it doesn’t require a lot of power. In fact, if you look at the NVIDIA BIOS, the default max power is 75W, so the electrical specs look pretty good.

See also  Microsoft Xbox chief joins 'Fortnite'-maker Epic's go well with against Apple


ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB is an entry-level video card, but still for games.

Since it is an entry-level genre, it is not aimed at high-end games, but if it is at a level that does not interfere with playing regular or popular games at FHD resolution, then it is considered a graphics card that does the job. good enough.

So, starting with a simple 3DMark test, I tested five games.

In the case of 3DMark, the GS score showed Fire Strike in the 5000 range and Time Spy in the 2000 range.



For curious gamers, League of Legends performed well with an average frame rate of 334fps on Ultra High, which is the best choice, while games like Overwatch 2 and Final Fantasy 14 achieved high framerates with a reasonable number of settings. .

However, it looks tricky in games that require little 3D performance, but PUBG renders 84 frames with all settings set to low. If you’re aiming for 60 frames, you can increase some of the settings a bit, but this is not recommended because there may be frame drops depending on the situation.

In the case of resurrection in Diablo 2, things are a little more complicated. This is a somewhat disappointing result, as the test tested using the River of Flame test averaged 35 frames.

When testing the game, I felt that any regular 3D game can be played without problems. In particular, if you enjoy many online games, you may notice that they will give you much better results than the included graphics.

Compared to integrated graphics, there is a little more room to choose one of the options, and the difference in performance is obvious even with the same similar option, so calling it an object of comparison is ambiguous.

See also  Anunciado Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope

In other words, the performance is considered sufficient for gamers who simply enjoy popular online or casual games rather than AAA-level games, as well as for gamers who are not greedy for high-quality visuals.

■ Economical when setting up a basic gaming PC


Lately, the cheapest PC configuration mostly uses graphics built into the CPU. Of course, since the performance of integrated graphics has greatly improved, unlike in the past, it is a suitable environment for decorating low-cost PCs with a high price-performance ratio.

However, since integrated graphics have obvious limitations, they still cannot compete with external graphics in simple tasks or gaming performance. In that sense, if you want to enjoy 3D performance and gaming performance that is definitely superior to integrated graphics, you should opt for external graphics.

In particular, if you want to consider high value for money even when choosing external graphics, and if you mainly like light and casual games rather than high specs, the ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB looks perfect.

Although the base price of graphics cards has increased significantly compared to the past, they are considered inexpensive and affordable products.

Also, like I said earlier, if you want more 3D performance from a PC that’s been around for a while, I think it’s one of the good options you can choose from economical and inexpensive graphics cards. products.

Budget PCs come in different levels, but if you’re using an ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1630 OC 4GB, then you can spruce up a low-end and low-end PC by beautifying an entry-level gaming PC.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Realme GT Neo 5 specs have been revealed with incredible surprise!

Published

on

Realme GT Neo 5 specs have been revealed with incredible surprise!

Realme remains one of the most famous Android smartphone manufacturers, especially since it has managed to grow incredibly since its launch just a few years ago. More information about one of the upcoming Realme GT Neo 5 devices is now emerging.

One aspect where the Chinese manufacturer excels is in the charging capacity of its smartphones, which becomes evident when we look at the GT Neo 3, the first on the market with 150W fast charging.

We have now learned that the company may take this capability to the next level when the Realme GT Neo 5 hits the market with a 4600mAh battery and 240W charging power. If this information is confirmed, it will be the first smartphone with such a high charging capacity to hit the market.

Interestingly, Oppo has shown the possible results of this combination in the past. According to a demonstration held during Mobile World Congress 2022, a 4500mAh battery charged with 240W can reach 100% in just 9 minutes.

As for the other specifications of the Realme GT Neo 5, we only know that it should be equipped with a Sony IMX890 main sensor with support for optical image stabilization.

👍🏻 Other interesting articles:

See also  Nokia has revived one of the most iconic phones with a sleek new design
Continue Reading

Tech

ASUS Confirms Radeon RX 7900 XTX/XT TUF Gaming Clock Speeds

Published

on

ASUS Confirms Radeon RX 7900 XTX/XT TUF Gaming Clock Speeds

ASUS Radeon RX 7900 Series TUF Gaming Specifications Become Official

ASUS has become the first motherboard partner to fully confirm clock speeds for dedicated Radeon RX 7900 GPUs.

As reported last month, ASUS became the first company to introduce dedicated Radeon RX 7900 GPUs. These TUF gaming cards are based on the 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT drives with a custom three-fan design for 3.6 slots, and also feature three 8- power connectors. ASUS has already confirmed the clock speeds that will apply to each of the four announced models.

The official ASUS specification lists the so-called “standard” mode and “OC” mode. The latter is the highest official specification that ASUS software called GPU Tweak can apply. For this reason, it should not be regarded as an “unusual” specification, but as the highest officially supported certified clock speed, which will not affect the warranty.

As a reminder, the default gaming frequency of the Radeon RX 7900 XT is 2300 MHz, while the boost clock increases to 2500 MHz. For the Radeon RX 7900 XT GPU, these are 2000 MHz and 2400 MHz, respectively.

ASUS TUF RX 7900 Series Specifications, Source: ASUS

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XTX OC Edition

  • Modo OS:
    • up to 2615 MHz (clock frequency) +4.6%
    • up to 2455 MHz (game clock) +6.7%
  • default mode:
    • até 2565 MHz (Boost Clock) +2.6%
    • Up to 2395 MHz (game clock) +4.1%

ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900XT OC Edition

  • Modo OS:
    • até 2535 MHz (Boost clock) +5.6%
    • up to 2175 MHz (game clock) +8.7%
  • default mode:
    • até 2500 MHz (clock frequency) +4.1%
    • up to 2130 MHz (game clock) +6.5%
See also  NASA releases first images of the invisible universe taken by the Webb-Xinhua Telescope

The overclocked version of the Radeon RX 7900 XTX TUF Gaming GPU is clocked at 2565 MHz by default, which is 2.6% (increase) of the factory overclock. However, in OC mode, clock speeds are 4.6% faster than AMD’s claims. On the other hand, the RX 7900 XT TUF OC is slightly overclocked. By default, it runs at 2500 MHz, which is 4.1% higher than the specification, and in OC mode, a software overclock of 5.6% is applied.

The gaming clock is higher, but with proper cooling, the GPU is more likely to hit its clocks than the gaming ones. Overall, these performance improvements are similar to the Radeon RX 6900 XT TUF OC Gaming GPUs, but it’s worth noting that ASUS has a higher-end TUF TOP Edition with higher overclocking.

source: ASUS 7900XT TUF OSIt’s in ASUS 7900 XTX TUF OS

Continue Reading

Tech

Gas giant exoplanet discovered, twice the mass of the Earth: ScienceAlert

Published

on

Gas giant exoplanet discovered, twice the mass of the Earth: ScienceAlert

A recently suspended exoplanet has puzzled astronomers.

By taking measurements of a very small Jupiter-sized exoplanet called HD-114082b, scientists found that its characteristics do not match either of the two popular models for the formation of gas giant planets.

Simply put, he is too heavy for his age.

“Compared to currently accepted models, HD-114082b is two to three times denser for a young gas giant just 15 million years old,” he said. explains astrophysicist Olga Zakhazy from the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany.

This exoplanet, orbiting a star called HD-114082 at a distance of about 300 light-years, has been the subject of an intense data collection campaign. At only 15 million years old, HD-114082b is one of the youngest exoplanets ever discovered, and understanding its properties could provide clues to how planets form, a process that is not fully understood.

Two types of data are needed to comprehensively characterize an exoplanet based on its influence on the host star. The transit data is a record of how the light of a star dims when an orbiting exoplanet passes in front of it. If we know how bright the star is, this slight dimming could reveal the exoplanet’s size.

On the other hand, radial velocity data is a record of how much a star wobbles in response to the gravitational pull of the outer planets. If we know the mass of a star, the amplitude of its oscillations can give us the mass of an exoplanet.

For nearly four years, the researchers have been collecting observations of the radial velocity of HD-114082. Using data collected on transit and radial velocity, the researchers determined that HD-114082b has a similar radius. Jupiter – But the mass of Jupiter is 8 times greater. This means that the density of the exoplanet is almost twice that of the Earth, and about 10 times that of Jupiter.

See also  airports, streaming devices, laptops and more on sale

The size and mass of this small exoplanet means it is unlikely to be a very large rocky planet; top borders around it 3 earth radius It’s in 25 earth masses.

Rocky exoplanets also have a very small density band. Above this range the body becomes more intenseAnd the planet’s gravity begins to contain an important atmosphere of hydrogen and helium.

HD-114082b significantly exceeds these parameters, which means it is a gas giant. But astronomers don’t know how it happened.

“We think that the giant planets could have formed in two possible ways.” says astronomer Ralf Lönnhardt mpiya. “Both occur within a protoplanetary disk of gas and dust distributed around a young central star.”

Both methods are called “cold start” or “warm start”. During a cold start, an exoplanet is thought to form, pebble by pebble, from the debris of a disk orbiting a star.

Parts are attracted to each other first electrostatically and then gravitationally. The larger the mass, the faster it grows until it becomes massive enough to cause the runaway accumulation of hydrogen and helium, the two lightest elements in the universe, creating a huge shell of gas around the rocky core.

Given that gases lose heat as they fall towards the planet’s core and form an atmosphere, this is considered a relatively cool option.

Hot start is also known as disk instability and is believed to occur when a swirling region of instability in the disk collapses directly on itself under the force of gravity. As a result, the object is a fully formed exoplanet without a rocky core, as the gases hold more heat.

See also  Windows 10: New Update Solves Big Sound Problem!

Exoplanets that experience a cold start or a hot start must cool at different rates, leading to different features that we should observe.

The researchers say the performance of the HD-114082b is not suitable for a hot start model. Its size and mass are more consistent with primary accretion. Even so, he is still quite large for his size. Either it contains an unusual core, or something else is going on.

“It is too early to abandon the idea of ​​a hot start” Lennhardt says🇧🇷 “All we can say is that we still don’t quite understand the formation of giant planets.”

Exoplanets are one of three planets less than 30 million years old for which astronomers have obtained radius and mass measurements. So far, all three seem to be inconsistent with the disk instability model.

Three is clearly too small for the sample size, but three to three indicates that primary accumulation is probably the more common of the two.

“While more planets of this type are needed to confirm this trend, we think theorists need to start rethinking their calculations.” Zahozay says.

“It’s amazing how the results of our observations fit into the theory of planet formation. They help improve our knowledge of how these giant planets grow and tell us where there are gaps in our understanding.”

Research published in astronomy and astrophysics.

Continue Reading

Trending