Connect with us


Bolsonaro and Lula trade accusations of lying in a debate that has cornered Brazil’s president on “Women for Peace.”



Not surprisingly, Brazil’s early Monday presidential debate was marked by a head-to-head confrontation between incumbent President Jair Bolsonaro and his main opponent, PT candidate Lula da Silva. An insulting comment about the journalist turned almost all the participants in the discussion against the inhabitant of the Planalto Palace, who was cornered on the topic of “women”.

Scandals and corruption
The aggressive Bolsonaro began by accusing the former president of running “the most corrupt government in the history of Brazil,” referring to the scandals uncovered during Operation Lava Jato at Petrobras, an oil company. Less aggressive than Jair Bolsonaro, and perhaps for that reason less effective, Lula defended himself by citing an extensive list of anti-corruption initiatives taken by his former government.

“The country I left is the country people miss”, Lula da Silva said. And the PT candidate left a promise: “This country will return.” Lula also promised “a war against the educational backlog left by the pandemic.”

Despite Bolsonaro’s provocations, Lula (who leads the polls so far) assumed the pose of a statesman, not responding to the current president’s tone.
In the second part of the debate, Bolsonaro referred to the Auxílio Brasil legislative initiative and accused the PT of disapproving it. A real-time assessment of Folla de São Paulo concluded that Bolsonaro lied. In fact, the initiative was voted for Lula’s party.

Like himself, President Jair Bolsonaro called Lulu an “ex-prisoner” and viciously attacked TV Cultura journalist Vera Magalhães when asked about vaccinations. “I think you are sleeping thinking of me, you can’t take sides in a debate like this. You are a disgrace to journalism,” Bolsonaro replied to the journalist, clearly annoyed.

See also  Video. Heavy rains wreak havoc in Spain

In addition to the leaders in the voting intent polls, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva and Jair Bolsonaro, Ciro Gomes, Simone Tebet, Luis Felipe d’Avila and Soraya Troniche also took part in the mega debate.

Not only Lula da Silva attacked Jair Bolsonaro. One of the sharpest statements addressed to the incumbent president was made by Simone Tebet: “We need to change the president of the republic,” the senator said, accusing Jair Bolsonaro of threatening democracy and the independence of the Federal Supreme Court.

Jair Bolsonaro, the only participant who started the debate without greeting anyone, also spoke of “judicial activity” to accuse the judge of interfering with the legislature without preventing interference with the judiciary.

During this peculiar three-hour face-to-face conversation, questions were asked by a group of journalists from the Bandeirantes and Cultura TV channels, the Folha de São Paulo newspaper and the UOL portal, organizers of the debate. The debate was also marked by Lula’s and Bolsonaro’s demand not to sit side by side on the “plateau” of the Bandeirantes network.

The debate was marked by undemocratic scenes in the “living room” set up by the organizers of the debate, which took place without spectators. It was the hottest moment of the night. Team members Bolsonaro and Lula almost got into a fight when the candidates discussed deforestation in the Amazon.

According to a real-time poll of 64 people by DataFolha, re-election candidate Jair Bolsonaro received the worst score in the debate.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ukraine: war has entered ‘dangerous phase’, head of European diplomat warns



“The war continues, and the news from the battlefield is favorable for Ukraine. Ukraine is back on the offensive [mas] The war has entered a new phase, a phase that is undoubtedly dangerous because we are facing a frightening scenario that we must not turn a blind eye to,” said the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

Speaking in a debate at the plenary session of the European Parliament in the French city of Strasbourg, Josep Borrell spoke of “a scenario of conventional war involving a nuclear power, a nuclear power that is now retreating from the usual scenario and that threatens to use nuclear weapons.”

“This is certainly a worrying scenario in which we must show that our support for Ukraine is unwavering,” he stressed.

Despite emphasizing that “Ukraine is advancing on three fronts, in the Donbass, […]in the southern center of Zaporizhia, advancing on Mariupol, and finally on Kherson,” the head of public diplomacy pointed out that Russia “still has a superiority in numbers, superiority in firepower,” so caution is needed.

Earlier today, EU member states reached a political agreement on new sanctions against Russia for invading Ukraine, the eighth package, due to come into effect on Thursday as a “strong response” to the annexation of Ukrainian territories.

Proposed by the European Commission last Wednesday, amid Russia’s “new escalation” with “fraudulent referendums”, partial mobilizations and the threat of nuclear weapons, a new package of EU sanctions includes a ceiling on Russian oil prices, new trade restrictions, depriving Russia of about 7 billion euros revenues, a ban on the export of more products to deprive the Kremlin of key technologies for the Russian military machine, and an update to the list of individuals and entities subject to restrictive measures. .

See also  The Russian army announced the destruction of 45,000 tons of Ukrainian weapons sent by NATO

In particular, the EU added to the list of individual sanctions pro-Russian officials in the Russian-occupied Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions of Ukraine.

In recent days, there have even been Russian attacks on the area of ​​the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant in southern Ukraine, the largest in Europe, after Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a partial mobilization of 300,000 Russian reservists.

“The position of the Russian army is very bad. Including because the Russian soldiers do not know what the war is for, and those 300,000 who will be taken from their native places to the front will understand even less, so the war can be won on the battlefield, but it must be won. in the realm of ideas. In addition to the war itself, there is another war – the war for the supremacy of values, ”said Josep Borrell.

And at a time when there are fears of interruptions in Russian gas supplies to the EU, the head of EU diplomacy stressed that Russian President Vladimir Putin “waits for cold weather, interruptions in gas supplies, high prices and low temperatures in order to undermine the European will and will continue to support Ukraine”.

“Here we need to ask the Europeans to understand what is at stake, because our support for Ukraine is not just a matter of generosity, our support for Ukraine must be unwavering, because the security of Ukraine is inextricably linked to our own security,” he added.

Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24th.

Continue Reading


Maps released by Russian Defense Ministry show rapid withdrawal of troops from Ukraine – Obozrevatel



follow up here our Ukrainian military live blog

Maps released on Tuesday by Russian authorities appear to show a rapid withdrawal of Russian troops from areas in southern and eastern Ukraine, where they are facing heavy pressure from the Ukrainian counteroffensive.

Number briefing Every day, the Russian Ministry of Defense showed several maps to pinpoint the exact location of the attacks that the military is carrying out on the territory of Ukraine. Although there was no mention of the withdrawal of soldiers, various media outlets indicated that the shaded area related to Russian military control decreased significantly compared to the previous day.

According to the statement, the images were later posted on social media by Rybar, one of the few Russian sources of military information. sky news. The blue areas are under Ukrainian control, the red areas are controlled by Russia and the separatist authorities in Donetsk and Luhansk. Areas with stripes refer to the war zone.


In the Kherson region (south), maps show that Russian troops no longer control the town of Dudchany, located on the western bank of the Dnieper River, an area where the Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to reclaim territory.

Indeed, on Monday, the Russian-appointed regional leader of Kherson already acknowledged the successes of the Ukrainian military. “Tense, so to speak,” Vladimir Saldo said in an interview with Russian state television. “There is a place called Dudchany, along the Dnieper, and there, in that area, there were advances,” explained.

See also  Video. Heavy rains wreak havoc in Spain

How do you refer to Reuterson the maps issued now it is indicated that in Kherson The Russian line of control on the right bank of the Dnieper appears to have shifted 25 kilometers south.

In Kharkiv Oblast (northeast), maps show that the Russians appear to have abandoned their positions on the west bank of the Oskil River. Along the front line about 70 km south of Kupyansk along the Oskill River, the military will retreat about 20 kilometers to the eastto the Lugansk border.

This change means that the Russian military has left the last areas they occupied in the Kharkiv region, with the exception of a small area between the city of Dvorechnaya and the border with Russia.

A list of weapons from Ukraine to the United States, a risky plan and an inexperienced Russian battalion: behind the scenes of the counteroffensive in Kharkov

Both regions are areas where Ukraine has made progress, albeit in a limited way. The Ukrainian president stressed on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces were pursuing a “fast and powerful” offensive in the country’s south, adding that dozens of settlements had been recaptured this week in four regions recently annexed by Moscow. “This week alone, dozens of sites have been cleared” in southern and eastern Ukraine, he said.

Continue Reading


The United States announced a new package of military assistance to Kyiv for 627.3 million euros



Biden, who was accompanied by his Vice President Kamala Harris, reaffirmed the United States of America’s (US) support for Ukraine’s defense against Russian invasion from “time as needed” during a conversation with Zelensky, according to a White House statement.

US assistance includes long-range high mobility rocket artillery systems (HIMARS), as well as weapons, ammunition, and armored vehicles.

The US President also said that his country is ready to impose “serious costs” on any person, organization or country that supports Russia’s efforts to annex Ukrainian territory.

On the other hand, Biden noted the “success” of the agreement allowing the “safe” export of Ukrainian grains to international markets, and said that this should continue.

Before the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February this year, the United States had already provided military assistance to Kyiv and trained its armed forces, but since the current conflict, this assistance has doubled.

Russia on Tuesday completed parliamentary procedures to annex four partially occupied territories in eastern and southern Ukraine, forcing Kyiv to close its doors to any peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, deeming the annexation invalid.

Agreements on the annexation of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions received today the approval of the Senate of Russia, where they received the support of all deputies of the Upper House of Parliament.

The military offensive launched on February 24 by Russia in Ukraine has already caused the flight of more than 13 million people – more than six million internally displaced people and more than 7.5 million to European countries – according to the latest UN figures, which rank this migration crisis as the worst in Europe since World War II (1939-1945).

See also  Two doses of the vaccine will neutralize the Delta variant, a new study says.

The Russian invasion, justified by Russian President Vladimir Putin on the need to “denazify” and demilitarize Ukraine for Russia’s security, was condemned by the international community as a whole, which responded by sending weapons to Ukraine and imposing them on Russia. political and economic sanctions.

The UN presented 6,114 civilian deaths and 9,132 wounded as confirmed since the start of the war, stressing that these figures are much lower than the real ones.

Continue Reading