Connect with us

Politics

Heartbreaking hopelessness is possibly the most powerful political anesthesia that has ever affected us.

Published

on

Heartbreaking hopelessness is possibly the most powerful political anesthesia that has ever affected us.

How national politics unfold is a central issue in every debate on issues raised by the media, influencers and political agents in general. Often, however, discussions sound like a simple arrangement of recordings, the language and the issues themselves are moving away from citizens and closer to the intellectual elite, thereby creating a chasm between the pillars of democracy and those who will influence the top of the political elite. ceta.

Under this fire, all psychic efforts must be employed so that analytical success is the only possible consequence. Regarding the triple division of state power, it is useless to rejoice solely and exclusively on the basis of the basic concept of checks and balances. There is no doubt that the dynamics of the Three Forces can hit fools like a storm of chaos and, as a conceptual variation of such idealistic chaos, disorganized information. However, the notion that the dynamism of power is an eternal mystery, which will never fall the light of the understanding of the citizen, is a stupid exaggeration; perhaps, without a fog of distortion, to understand the functioning of institutional machines, since they are known to the masses.

From bucolics passing through the peripheral citizens of emographically dense metropolitan areas to madmen who, under the aegis of the traditional political game, squander treasury resources to indulge in the filth of old Brazilian politics; everyone can ascend intellectually under the guise of social catharsis, in which everyone, as a legitimate politician, will participate in the game as autonomous figures, and not as puppets of unreasonable gurus or golden calves, whose stupidity comes only from fecal fatty.

See also  Spain turns 10 without ETA, but a group shadow looms over politics - 10/21/2021

In 2018, Jair Messias Bolsonaro was democratically elected to the top executive post. They shouted about morality, justice, conservatism, and this cry echoed throughout Brazil, where he found shelter, and also about reciprocity.

As for the convalescent republic abandoned by Michel Temer, the new owner of Planalto had, from the point of view of a section of the population, the morality and decency necessary to correct the mistakes of the old policy; renewal, change, reconstruction, all nouns that clearly describe the aspirations of the people who freely expressed themselves at the polling stations.

However, the collective frustration will come at a gallop, and this value base will be tested. Bolsonaro betrayed everyone, at least those who believed that his policies would be destructive. He, the president of the republic, repeatedly grumbled about defending economic liberalism, advocated an end to the phrase “take it there,” he was angry with criminals and used jargons like “call me corrupt!”. they expressed an equality between crime and corruption.

All of the above guidelines (and many others) were trampled by policies that did not live up to their promises, and people became even more fragmented: some opted for classic and hypocritical blind idolatry, others jumped from a boat that was now sailing to ancient ports, and still others they used failure of hope to feed the darkness. The old policy did not end, it was not intimidated, it gained strength, strength and clung to the state like a strengthened parasite, which gradually shielded the old marauders from the treasury and brought sad impotence on the masses chosen by them. impunity. Opium in Brazil is not a religion, perhaps it is hopelessness, pain, the truth that everything that Mito seemed endowed with never existed.

Author:

Daniel dos Santos de Moraes

See also  Saullo Vianna, the pilgrim's assistant, opens the game about his political future.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Marcos Braz responds to social media politics after Maracanã controversy

Published

on

Marcos Braz responds to social media politics after Maracanã controversy

BUT Negative disagreement with Vasco over the use of Maracana rocked social media on this Sabbath day. Tarcisio Motta, Councilor of the City of Rio and federal candidate, published a publication saying that the stadium is for all fans. An irritated Marcos Braz, Vice President of Flamengo Football Club and also an adviser, responded to the politician.

+ Who is better: Botafogo or Fluminense? Watch the player vote in the LANCE newsroom!

– Maracana is public! It was built and renovated (several times) with government money! Its concession cannot run counter to the interests of all citizens. Denying the consortium is baseless, absurd and FORCE US TO ACTIVATE MP. Maraca for all fans,” Tarcisio wrote on Twitter.

– When it comes to paying operating costs, no, – said the vice-president of Flamengo.

+ The state government observes the violation of Flamengo and Fluminense and requests the release of Maracana for Vasco

The controversy began after Vasco applied for the loan of Maracanã against Sport in a match valid for Serie B on 3 July. A stadium consortium led by Flamengo and Fluminense rejected the request.

The clubs’ decision caused a huge uproar, and the state government decided to connect to the track. The stadium soap opera is divided and promises to open new chapters in the coming days.

See also  Increasing poverty and hunger at the center of political debate - Politics
Continue Reading

Politics

Adelio’s view of Bolsonaro and politics

Published

on

Adelio's view of Bolsonaro and politics