Connect with us

Politics

Left bets on federation, targeting the core that will rule with Lula – Folha Political

Published

on

Left bets on federation, targeting the core that will rule with Lula - Folha Political

The PSB and PT benches are expected to meet separately next week to discuss a common theme: federation. The problem that has arisen, say the parliamentarians who participated in the discussion as a “lifeline” for the PCdoB, is gaining traction on the sidelines, based on the following argument: will rule with former President Lula if he is elected President of the Republic in 2022.

It is the strategic political component that drives the discussion. Such reasoning developed behind the scenes through a federation of PT, PCdoB, PSB, and PSOL. In other words, the idea is that these acronyms form the basis of the campaign, which will serve as a reference point for the government’s support base.

In parallel with this political variable, there is one more – the electoral one. The latter is due to the prevailing opinion in these parties today that, on the proportional map analyzed in each specific case, it seems that the best condition for maintaining or expanding benches in the course of electoral disputes is a federation.

This growing sympathy for the federation’s supporters comes from the growing closeness of the alliance of the four parties around Lula. And it was this line of reasoning that sparked the ongoing sewing around the federation, uniting the four acronyms.

do not repeat the mistake
Pro-federation parliamentarians with PT, PCdoB, PSOL and PSB privately admit that one of the criticisms of the Lula administration was that it left this core and shifted political support for its government to the center. “This deepened during the reign of Dilma. There has been a breakaway from the toughest core, which has a political identity, ”recalls an opposition deputy who prefers not to identify himself.

See also  Coronavirus stay information: WHO signals slowing of infections but India cases nonetheless soaring | Environment information

By month> As the convoy sang the stone, the national president of PT, Glazy Hoffmann, convened the national executive body last Monday to present the federation’s proposal. With whom exactly to join the federation was not discussed, but the consequences were discussed.

Listen> Among the members of the PC, it was decided to hold a meeting with the bench of deputies, senators and the national council to discuss the party’s chances of federation.

However> PT has six senators who are due to meet next week to discuss federation. The biggest difficulty in articulation would be in the game. Regional problems are important and the fact that the mechanism provides for vertical integration and a minimum period of four years.

Variable> Geraldo Alcmin is ready to leave PSDB but is still considering three alternatives: PSB, PSD, União Brasil. At PT and PSB, where leaders are betting on him to form a roster with Lula, the bets on him leaving the toucan nest have skyrocketed given what they call “slowness” on toucan caucus.

Look too

Football

Even without access, Helio gives a positive rating at the end of Serie B.

Saying goodbye to Seri B, Nautiko plays with Cruzeiro.
Football

Saying goodbye to Seri B, Nautiko plays with Cruzeiro.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

US has been preparing Ukraine for clash with Russia since 2014 – German politician

Published

on

www.brasil247.com - Ucrânia e EUA têm intensas relações militares que afetam a Rússia

“The US is selling its dirty shale gas while the US defense industry is booming,” said Oscar Lafontaine.




Continue Reading

Politics

The Evangelical Church has lost the most in the elections – 11/27/2022 – Opinion

Published

on

The Evangelical Church has lost the most in the elections - 11/27/2022 - Opinion

When I attended a meeting at my church to welcome new members, I heard the same story from many: They were there because it was an environment free of partisan politics. I remembered my own experience: I also accepted this criterion when I came from Recife and chose my church in São Paulo.

BUT Majority of evangelicals favor re-election of Jair Bolsonaro (PL) nothing new. All studies have shown this trend, and my experience confirms this. I don’t see a problem in the fact that the majority prefers this or that candidate, whoever he is. But it worries me political use of churches and, mostly, moments of worship to coerce the congregation into supporting the candidate.

For us, evangelists, worship is the time of the week for worshiping God, hearing the gospel, and fellowshipping with fellow believers. Before and during the campaign we saw the president and first lady use the pulpit to collect votes in the middle of the service🇧🇷 This attitude in itself should already be condemned and rejected by the evangelists themselves: the worship and authority of churches should not be used for electoral purposes.

This principle is not new even in the evangelical milieu. “When the evangelical church, as a church, makes a choice in favor of a candidate, it ceases to be a church. The Lord of the church is Jesus and he does not have voter registration in Brazil. We evangelists have the right to support, but to say that the Assembly of God supports “A” or “B” is to reduce the church to any institution, ”explained Silas Malafayain a 2002 video when he declared his support for the then-candidate Luis Inacio Lula da Silva (PT). Twenty years later, Malafaya, like other pastors, used his pulpit and Bible passages to support Bolsonaro.

See also  Coronavirus stay information: WHO signals slowing of infections but India cases nonetheless soaring | Environment information

Gradually the leaders and members of the various evangelical congregations began attitude to the vow as a confirmation of one’s faith in Christ🇧🇷 This association, in turn, leads to people patrolling and controlling other people’s votes, ridiculing or even excluding those who “vote wrong”. Communities that are supposed to welcome and unite completely different people under one faith have become a toxic environment.

The implications of this process go beyond spiritual matters. This indiscriminate and uncritical support from religious organizations and their leaders makes it difficult for evangelicals to participate in discussions of ideas and public policy. After all, they are stamped out as part of a political project (which doesn’t necessarily represent them in reality). The quality of public debate suffers and society becomes more polarized.

Evangelical leaders need to ask themselves how many members stopped attending services or even withdrew from their communities due to political discussions? Is this the example we want to set for the rest of society?

It is important to emphasize that the criticism of the political use of the cult and forced voting should not be confused with the position on the participation of evangelicals in politics. Every Brazilian has a trajectory, values, emotions and ways of thinking that make them support a candidate or an ideology.

No one should be excluded from public debate just because their values ​​were forged in a religious community. It is this logic that has inspired some Protestants to contribute to strengthening the state’s secular heritage so that they can freely practice their faith.

See also  Our strength in local government is an observer

However, when political forces take over the space devoted to the profession of faith, believers, the exercise of individual freedoms and, consequently, the reputation of society is damaged. That is, even if the evangelical majority candidate won, the church would still be one of the biggest losers in the election. To overcome defeat, evangelical leaders will have to return to engaging in public debate based on Christian values ​​and abandon the false messiah’s power project.

TRENDS / DISCUSSIONS
Articles published by subscription do not reflect the opinion of the newspaper. Its publication aims to stimulate the discussion of Brazilian and world issues and reflect the diverse trends of contemporary thought.

Continue Reading

Politics

Was the massacre of Aracruz politically and ideologically motivated?

Published

on

Was the massacre of Aracruz politically and ideologically motivated?

Aloisio Morais Martins

If the information about the teacher is confirmed Flavia Amos Merson Leonardo, 38 was the first to be hit by shots fired by a 16-year-old boy at the Primo Bitti public school in Praia do Coqueiral, in the municipality of Aracruz, north of Espirito Santo, this may be an indication that the massacre was plotted for two years may have political motivation – ideological. The killer killed three teachers, a 12-year-old schoolboy and left 12 injured, five of them are still hospitalized in serious condition.

First, it would be good to define the context of the crime that the so-called “mainstream press” covered up: the massacre took place in a condominium created by the Aracruz Celulose company decades ago when it was implanted in the city. which eventually took on its name. It enjoys a privileged location, close to Praia do Coqueiral and 22 kilometers from the nerve center of the inland city of Aracruz. The condominium, intended for high-ranking employees of the company, has grown and today has become a residence for families of upper and middle class, and not just for employees of the company.

The minor who wore Nazi symbols during the crimes is the son of a military police lieutenant, Bolsonarist, who has already posted about Mincha Luta’s book written by the genocidal Adolf Hitler. “The book sucks. I read it and hated it,” he said. But a military man is, first of all, a person of the right wing. On social media, the boy looks dapper next to his father at a demonstration by Bolsonaro supporters. By the way, in the same hat as during the massacre.

See also  US election 2020: Joe Biden formally nominated as Bill Clinton lays into Trump | US News

On the other hand, Professor Flavia Amos Mercan Leonardo was known to be clearly a leftist. He had a postgraduate degree in social sciences from the Federal University of Espírito Santo, a PhD in anthropology from the Federal University of Minas Gerais and was an active participant in the Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens (MAB), which played an important role in ES after the collapse of the Vale dam in Mariana, Massachusetts, when the waters of the Rio Doche were stained with mud from mining to estuary on the coast of Espirito Santo five years ago. Flavia has dedicated her academic career to teaching fishermen and ES natives. Why was the teacher chosen as the killer’s first target? Just a coincidence, or did the student have an ideological dislike for Flavia? According to the researchers.

It is worth noting that the killer boy shows good signs that he learned a lot from his father, definitely his idol. Even though he was a minor, the videos show that he learned to drive a vehicle very well, even at high speeds. In addition to his resourcefulness, the video shows very clearly how well he handles the weapons that he carried with him. And he shoots well. Who did you learn from? In his first confessions, released by the police, he says he acted alone and learned to shoot behind his father’s back. Can you believe? Maybe he’s trying to save face in front of his father? The police will have to make progress in investigating these aspects. Either way, this massacre promises intriguing chapters in these days of weapon deification (which we hope are drawing to a close). Let’s see!

See also  Our strength in local government is an observer

And by the way, it doesn’t hurt to ask: does the killer’s father, like most Bolesonars, advocate coming of age at 16? Maybe for him “a good bandit is a dead bandit?”. Pepper is very good in the eyes of others, isn’t it?

Against the background of the tragedy, we have today in Espírito Santo a clear right-wing predominance in a state where Bolsonaro, for example, received 58.04% of the vote against 41.06% for Lulu in the second round of elections. . Those who were there, like me, on the eve of the elections, felt it very clearly in the streets and avenues, where big cars and double-cab pickups dominated the environment with their bold Bolsonaro advertising. The dominance is such that the elected president cannot hold rallies in the state due to the lack of a tribune. Re-elected governor Renato Casagrande of the PSB chose to light a candle to God and another to the devil, drawing the votes of the lulistas and bolsonarists by refusing to pose next to the petista.

Continue Reading

Trending