Connect with us

Tech

Beware of what you “find” on Mars, scientists warn after the discovery of the fossils.

Published

on

Imagem do rover da NASA em Marte à procura de fósseis de vida antiga

Mars remains a fertile field for otherworldly discoveries. There remains a strong belief that the planet has signs of Martian life that existed millions of years ago. However, researchers on the Red Planet looking for such signs of ancient life may be fooled by fossil specimens created by chemical processes.

These warnings open up a new front of doubt and uncertainty. Is the planet really just a handful of emptiness?

Rocks on Mars may contain several types of non-biological sediments, which look like the types of fossils that could be found if life ever existed on the planet, one study says.

The researchers say separating these false fossils from what may indicate ancient life on the surface of Mars that was temporarily inhabited four billion years ago is key to the success of current and future missions.

Mars may have structures similar to fossils

Astrobiological das Edinburgh Universities and Oxford are reviewing evidence for all known processes that could have created similar living sediments in the rocks of Mars.

As shown, they have identified dozens of processes - many of which are likely not yet discovered - that can create structures that mimic the simple microscopic life forms that may have existed on Mars.

Fossil Image Sample

Natural patterns that these processes can create are sediments that look like bacterial cells and carbon-based molecules that look like the building blocks of all known life forms.

In the past, we were deceived by the processes of imitation of life. In many cases, objects similar to fossil microbes have been described in ancient rocks on Earth and even in meteorites on Mars, but upon closer examination it turned out that they are of non-biological origin.

This article is a cautionary tale in which we call for further research into the processes of life imitation in the context of Mars, so as not to fall into the same traps over and over again.

To Julie Cosmidis, Associate Professor of Geobiology, University of Oxford.

Scientists say scientists will have to take a closer look at non-biological mineral deposits that look a lot like fossils, as in the case of the rover. Tenacity from the USA or Chang'e 5 from China.

At some point, the rover will almost certainly collide with something that looks a lot like a fossil, so being able to distinguish it from chemical structures and substances formed by chemical reactions is vital. For every type of fossil, there is at least one non-biological process that creates very similar things, so there is a real need to improve our understanding of how they are formed.

Explained by Sean McMahon, an astrobiologist at the University of Edinburgh.

Robots' eyes can be fooled by non-biological phenomena

Examples of such phenomena include physical processes associated with the destruction and deposition of sedimentary layers, which can lead to the formation of rocks with a strong visual resemblance to fossils.

"Fossils" can also be created in a "chemical garden," where the continuous mixing of chemicals can create biological-like structures. The same can happen with many minerals that biomorphs can create that look like biological fossils.

According to the authors of the study published in the journal, Journal of the Geological SocietyThere must be many other processes that can produce pseudo-fossils, so scientists will have to be careful with what they find on the red planet, which has been the focus of several studies looking for life.

Therefore, whenever evidence of ancient Martian life emerges, it should always be questioned as this evidence may have been “tampered with” by non-biological processes. In this sense, has there ever been life on Mars?

See also  Google Cloud Next '21: Resilience, Operations, Data, Infrastructure & Security
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Google plans to double sales of Pixel phones by 2023

Published

on

Imagem de: Google pretende dobrar vendas de celulares Pixel em 2023

BUT Google set ambitious targets for the company’s smartphone division for 2023. Nikkei Asiagiant’s goal is to sell twice as many Pixel phones next year compared to the expected figures for 2022.

To achieve this goal, the manufacturer has already ordered more than 8 million units of models. Pixel 7 e Pixel 7 Pro, submitted this Thursday (6) along with other proprietary devices, like a tablet this is smart watch.

Furthermore, over 4 million units on one “The cheapest pixel” would also have been ordered for an early 2023 launch. So far, there is no word from the company about launching another smartphone in the coming months.

The previous generation of mobile phone brands, Pixel 6 It was the fastest selling Google smartphone in history. The last cheapest model was Pixel 6awhich has been sold since the second half of this year.

However, it is worth remembering that the company sells these and other models only in selected markets, which does not include Brazil. With ambitious plans, perhaps in the future the company will begin to bring devices to other markets.

The original report contains the same information from two different sources on the subject, but Google hasn’t commented on the case.

See also  Call of Duty Warzone 2.0 releases November 16th
Continue Reading

Tech

GAME BOOSTERS improve mobile performance? We have tested!

Published

on

GAME BOOSTERS improve mobile performance?  We have tested!

Do you know that little window that stays open on your mobile when you go to play? Today we will study it in detail. Game Boosters, do these gaming performance apps work or is it all bullshit and placebo effect? This is what we are going to discover today at Roda Liso.

GAME BOOSTERS work or not?

Some time ago I was tagged in a group Smooth wheel in Telegram I suggest testing gaming accelerators from smartphone brands if this feature really delivers better performance while gaming. So I went there with all the fun, I set aside some time a day to test the game with and without the booster activated and was amazed: NOTHING CHANGED! That’s all for today, until the next video…

But calm down, let’s figure out what does not work out? Check it out, Game Booster is a smartphone app that allows you to clear memory and optimize gaming performance. What it does is eliminate programs running in the background and give priority to the running game. Having said that, I end here and point out that the difference between turning the game booster on and off when your mobile is already well prepared to run the game is minimal, something like 3, 4 frames.

real test

But I decided to go further: and if you test a smartphone in two extreme and absurd situations? My first game was with the included game booster, everything was fine, the games started as they should. The second game was made to fully extrapolate the BASIC RULES OF THE WORLD: Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Camera and a bunch of other things running in the background.

tested smartphones

We use smartphones from three different brands and three games on each of them. Brands Samsungas Galaxy S22, Motorolaas Edge 30 e xiaomias SMALL F4. We have selected 3 of the hardest games we know: Genshin Impact, Life After and Tower Of Fantasy.

See also  Unboxed: Aug 11 Samsung Showcases Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Z Flip 3 - Hardware

Samsung Galaxy S22

Genshin Impact

With graphics set to maximum quality, we got the result 58 FPS average with 91% stability without using Game Booster.

With Game Booster activated, we had a much better result, 60 frames at 99% stability. The question here is not what Booster does, but how its performance is affected by the simultaneous execution of several applications.

fantasy tower

We also played Tower Of Fantasy at max with 90 FPS turned on. Here we had a big difference in results, since without Game Booster we achieved an average of 39 frames with 77% stability.

Now that all inclusive is nice, take 60 average frames, 79% stability. You can see on your own a clear difference between the two gameplays, without a booster everything is much worse.

Life after

In Life After, the overall result hasn’t changed much, but you can see very obvious performance differences just by filming the gameplay itself. Without Game Booster and with maximum graphics, we averaged 42 frames with 69% stability.

With the booster activated, we scored 45 frames, 74% stability. Okay, the difference in numbers is not that big, but the experience during the game, the feeling of performance, it’s very noticeable, since Game Booster has eliminated a lot of those crashes and stutters that we had.

SMALL F4

Genshin Impact

POCOs usually have a slightly more advanced Game Booster system than other brands as it shows FPS, CPU usage and allows us to create performance optimization profiles for each game. In Genshin, when everything is at its maximum, With Game Booster off and a few apps running in the background, we got an average frame rate of 48 with 91% stability.

It didn’t change much after enabling Booster, but we did get a stability boost with less FPS fluctuations: 48 medium frames, 98% stability.

See also  After the confusion, DuckDuckGo started blocking Microsoft scripts

fantasy tower

In Tower Of Fantasy we got the opposite result. The game started playing at 53 FPS at 84% stability with Game Booster disabled.

Shortly after performance 52 frames at 71% with him. The booster didn’t affect Tower of Fantasy, it probably happens to other games as well, as it’s not possible to match the application with all existing games.

Life after

In Life After, the difference was minimal, with a POCO score 36 fps on average, 99% stability initially, no booster enabled.

With the application running, we reached the average value 39 FPS, 98% stability. You can see that the change happened in a different way, not for stability, but for rawer FPS, which is also always welcome.

Motorola Edge 30

Genshin Impact

The Edge 30 uses a different boost method than I’m used to seeing, you’ll notice the results we got. In our Genshinzer we took 46 average frames, 97% stability with Game Booster off and complete nonsense running in the background.

Now, by activating “high performance mode”, the result changes dramatically, it’s even funny how it works. We took an average of 57 frames with 97% stability.what a miracle,

fantasy tower

In Tower Of Fantasy, I can already say that we didn’t have much difference, no. With everything off and apps running in the background, we averaged 57 FPS with 87% stability.

When high performance mode is enabled we achieved a frame rate of 59 with 100% stability. What I noticed the most here is the consistency of the frames, they changed less, but otherwise the result was the same.

Life after

The last test video is here, let’s go. Without the booster, we got a low frame rate of 31 frames with 99% stability.quite a nasty performance to play, let’s face it.

After turning on Game Booster, we achieved a very satisfactory result. 49 average FPS with 93% stability. This was one of the games where I noticed the biggest difference in high performance mode, obviously the extra smoothness the optimizer gave us.

See also  Horizon Chase 2 Coming to Consoles and PC in 2023

What did you understand?

Many people are biased towards mobile phone optimizers because most of the time it seems like they don’t do anything. Both Nicholas and I hated these Lifetime Game Boosters because we thought they did nothing but turn off notifications and close background apps.

Turns out we’ve been wrong all along (partly because there are still some game boosters out there that actually just clear the RAM and mute the phone). In this series of tests, we proved two points: playing with many applications in the background affects its performance and that optimizers really help.

The important detail is that A LITTLE this is Motorola warn us that smartphone can get very hot using “gaming way”, which happened. Keep in mind that enabling these performance options will cause your finger to burn from the hot screen, and that’s the price you pay for a few extra frames.

Now we have an additional question for you: who was the most impressed with the results? O Edge 30 by Motorola, to be sure. I was horrified by the jump in smoothness that the Edge 30 made when I turned on the “high performance” option, the difference in frames is instantaneous. But one cannot ignore A LITTLE, with its customization menu giving us the option to create specific profiles for every game we play. Another point to note about POCO is that its performance has stayed the same with apps running in the background and Game Enhancer enabled, which means this device handles background operations better and already has very high performance in pattern mode.

Continue Reading

Tech

Xaiomi is launching its latest product in Europe, the Redmi Buds 4 Pro, with up to 36 hours of battery life.

Published

on

Xaiomi is launching its latest product in Europe, the Redmi Buds 4 Pro, with up to 36 hours of battery life.

Technology

The brand has just launched the product overseas and there is no word yet on when it will launch in Brazil.

Playback/Pixabay
Playback/Pixabay

Xiaomi showed the world its new product, last Tuesday (4), the global version of their Redmi Bud 4 Pro headphones without the manufacturer’s premium wire. With a battery that can last an incredible 36 hours, the device will be connected via Bluetooth 5.3 and the high-definition LDAC codec. The product also features water and dust resistance, as well as active noise suspension capability that uses artistic intelligence to eliminate outside noise up to 43db.

The launch was only announced abroad, in Europe, with a suggested price of around 90 euros (about 463 reais at the current price without taxes). However, there is no information about the arrival of new items in Brazil yet. However, its consumers are already looking forward to the novelty.

Redmi Buds 4 Pro are TWS (True Wireless Stereo) earbuds containing two diposros speakers on each side: a large 10mm diameter aluminum one and a smaller 6mm titanium one, which can be used to play higher sounds. However, the device is compatible with Sony’s LDAC codec, capable of playing files at up to 990 kbps, but in this particular configuration, the device will have to compete with this codec. Redmi Bud still supports AAC and SBC codecs and has an immersive mode very similar to Airpods Space Audio.

The brand, in addition to the value for the consumer, compatible in many models with his income, is loved by the public for presenting excellent telephone devices and always with the most modern accessories. The company is one of the most popular brands in the country, ranking 3rd behind Motorola and Samsung by 11.45%.

See also  Twitch star Timthetatman lastly gained a video game of Tumble Guys
Continue Reading

Trending