Connect with us

Politics

Veronica’s Voice in Europe’s Last Dictatorship – Opinion

Published

on

Veronica's Voice in Europe's Last Dictatorship - Opinion

Veronika voted for the first time in 1994 in the elections, as a result of which Lukashenka was elected president of Belarus. He returned to voting only 26 years later, that was a year ago. He decided not to vote in the presidential elections of 2001, 2006, 2010 and 2015, as he considered them a farce in order to perpetuate the power of those who presented themselves as “dad” (father of the nation), but in fact, each time they showed themselves more and more as an authoritarian boss and a despot.

On August 9, 2020, Veronica felt that the vote was worth one more time. This was the sixth time that Lukashenko’s name was on the ballot box, but it was felt that the regime of the sole boss with a mustache imitating Stalin had finally exhausted itself. Polls recognized the possibility of electing Svetlana Tikanovskaya as a symbol of a new, democratic Belarus. Veronica voted for Svetlana.

Veronica was born in 1975 in Minsk, then 15 years ago in the Soviet Union. In August 1991, he celebrated the independence of the Republic of Belarus after the collapse of the Soviet empire. In 1994, he voted for the first time in free elections, he was elected president, and there was hope for the elected official Lukachenko. The following year, he faded into the background when the president advocated replacing the red and white flag of independence with a flag (with Portuguese colors) that restored the flag of the Soviet dictatorship. It was another sign of nostalgia for the former authoritarian regime.

Veronica now works as a history teacher and activist in a community organization affiliated with the Catholic Church and dedicated to social support. When he heard the announcement of Lukashenko’s re-election with 80% of the vote for a sixth term a year ago, he had no doubts that what they call an election had turned into an unimaginable election fraud as a result. proportions.

See also  Military in Politics - Shot in an Aircraft Carrier

Many of the many people who survived the elections with hope. Soon thereafter, street demonstrations against the Lukashenka regime and the exposure of election fraud became widespread and consistent. But the police were immediately involved in harsh repression.

The week after the vote, candidate Svetlana Tikanovskaya, whom the regime agreed with only 10 percent of the vote, given the wave of arrests, opted for self-exile in neighboring Lithuania. Svetlana took over the leadership of the Belarusian opposition instead of her husband, who is a political prisoner.

Thousands of people were arrested, many of them tortured, in those days of August last year for demanding the departure of the president, who, in their opinion, has lost legitimacy.

The scale of the demonstrations and the joining of strikes in this former Soviet republic of 9.5 million residents reflected an incompatible reality, as the opposition candidate received only 10% of the vote.

Furious with civil opposition, Lukashenko began to use increasingly harsh methods of repression. He liquidated NGOs that he considered critical and harassed media outlets that did not support him. Journalists and academics have been prime targets of the repression. The imprisonment of more than 35,000 Belarusians last year was recognized as a political order. Many people chose to leave the country.

Realizing that he was being persecuted as never before in the 27 years of his presidency, Lukashenko turned to Putin for help. Throughout history, Belarus has always been in the sphere of influence of Moscow. The exception is short periods of autonomy, the last period between 91 and 94 years, when everyday life approached the model of other European countries, hotels of very famous large international groups appeared in Minsk, and hamburger and Zaras stores appeared on sale. … But the locomotive of the Belarusian economy is Russia. The Kremlin is preventing a country so geostrategically sandwiched between Russia and NATO and European Union countries such as Poland and Lithuania from getting out of its orbit.

See also  Fesmepar discusses trade union perspectives and current Brazilian political and economic scenario at UGT - Oeste meeting | News

Lukashenko turned to Putin for help, and political coverage came from Moscow in the form of “help and understanding” the dictator needed. Feeling protected, in his delirium of suppressing dissent, Lukashenko unhesitatingly ordered an act of state aerial piracy last May: he ordered Ryanair Boeing, flying from Athens to Vilnius, to Minsk to capture and arrest Roman Protasevich, a critical journalist … who flew this plane. Then Europe protested, isolated the airspace of Belarus, but that’s all.

Now, last week, two dramatic episodes within 24 hours have returned to show what awaits anyone who dares to violate the rules set by the Lukashenka regime.

First, Olympic athlete Kristina Tsimanouskaya became an international case due to the fact that she had to contact the Tokyo airport police to get out of forced repatriation. Kristina was granted political asylum in Warsaw.

A few hours later, the case of Vitaly Shishov, the organizer of the reception of Belarusian refugees in Ukraine, was found hanged in a park in Kiev. Suspicions of murder disguised as suicide, of attacking dissidents, even in exile, are very strong. Vitaly was warned that he was threatened with kidnapping or murder during an operation planned by the Belarusian special services. The case is under investigation.

Lukashenko is the last remaining political dinosaur in Europe in the spirit of the old Soviet dictatorship. He survives in power and practices increasingly harsh and unworthy repression because he is supported by Putin.

Regular condemnations by the European Union and sanctions against the dictatorship are of very little help to those who are fighting for freedom and risking freedom in Belarus. It must be a battle for all of Europe at a time when in other parts of the world, in Venezuela, Egypt, the Philippines, Myanmar, as well as in Turkey, China and Russia, an authoritarian regime that despises freedom is growing and growing. respect for the dignity of people.

See also  Prosecutors of the joint venture are deprived of paid leave to participate in elections

All these cases are regrettable. Lukashenko on the European continent deserves top priority to be a model in the siege of dictators. The events of recent days have already prompted the United States to announce sanctions against strategic companies in the Belarusian state system. Europe is open to such decisions.

Lukashenka continues to respond threateningly to everything. This Monday, in a training exercise involving only other dictators, he challenged journalists and supporters to what was presented as a press conference, but which turned into an eight-hour rally (no mistakes, in fact, it was Lukashenko’s eight hours of verbiage. ), in which he wanted to present his version of reality: he disqualified the opposition, which was reducing an insignificant and manipulated minority from abroad, and even referred to the threat of the Third World War and argued that without his firmness, a world conflict could break out.

It remains to be seen how long Lukashenka will be able to continue raving.

Veronika wants to continue living on the outskirts of Minsk, despite the fact that she knows that every time she crosses the political border, at least to participate in a demonstration, she is at risk.

In account:

The relevance of the climate is reaching an extreme level of anxiety, as time goes on. When the world is on fire California TO GreeceAfter summer floods in Central Europe, it’s no surprise that a UN climate expert report condemns: this hell with an increase in the number of extreme events, it happens What for our life model is unstable… There are islands that are Pacific Ocean countries already under threatened with extinction.

Finally in Cabo Delgado anti-terrorist military action so much is needed.

First pages selected today: is an, This is an; same is an

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Rodrigo multiplies the transfer of political funds to the allies – 25.09.2022 – Poder

Published

on

Rodrigo multiplies the transfer of political funds to the allies - 25.09.2022 - Poder

São Paulo governor since April and candidate for re-election, Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), has maintained the practice of his predecessor João Doria (PSDB), of whom he was deputy governor, to multiply transfers of political funds to serve parliamentarians.

From January this year to the end of July, according to data obtained through the Law on Access to Information (LAI), the administration of Rodrigo e Doria allocated 1.28 billion reais to deputies in the form of resources to supplement its political base with benefits such as jobs and expenses.with health.

Like last year, even federal deputies were noticed in an unusual action.

BUT Sheet revealed that Doria had authorized BRL 1.05 billion (BRL 1.17 billion as adjusted) for parliamentarians for the same period in 2021. In 2020, the amount transferred was BRL 182.9 million (BRL 213.7 million as amended).

There has been a leap promoted by Doria and Rodrigo in pivotal years, from the Toucan primary in 2021 and the election in 2022.

Among the 14 parties under consideration, 9 make up Rodrigo’s coalition. The first six positions in the budget rating are occupied by the legends of this allied group.

The Tucana campaign hopes that, with the support of the public machine, the actions of mayors and deputies of the interior will contribute to a turn that will take Rodrigo to the second round in this last stretch.

The governor scored 19% in the latest Datafolha poll, behind Fernando Haddad (Portugal) with 34% and Tarcisio de Freitas (Republicans) with 23%.

The transfer of this amount, called a parliamentary demand, follows the logic of additional or voluntary amendments. That is, payment is optional and occurs at the discretion of the Tukan government, which ultimately benefits the allied base.

Impositional amendments are mandatory and are distributed equally among the 94 state deputies. The cost, however, is well below the budget allocated to the Allies. This year, each deputy is entitled to about 6.6 million reais (about 620 million reais in total).

See also  Military in Politics - Shot in an Aircraft Carrier

The TCE (State Audit Court) in its analysis of public accounts for 2021 cited evidence of a political distribution of values, as well as a lack of control and transparency regarding transfers.

Toucan opponents see the use of public funds as an electoral trump card to win the support of mayors, deputies and parties, which could lead to suspicions of abuse of power or administrative offenses, lawyers say. However, the introduction of additional amendments is common and legal in the system of public administration.

Last week, Rodrigo’s campaign began distributing a newspaper listing the government’s accomplishments in each city.

State MP Carlos Giannasi (PSOL) has already proposed a CPI on the issue, but has not received the required signatures from peers. “They’re replicating the same practices that Bolsonaro did,” he says of the speaker’s amendments supporting congressional support for the chief executive.

“This is an open way of co-opting deputies. So the government can take such unpopular measures. And it works very well because the mayors depend on the amendments,” he says.

Also, according to Giannatsi, what he calls clientelism creates unequal competition in elections between grassroots MPs, who have more storefronts, and opposition MPs. PSOL, for example, did not receive additional money.

The government stated that the service to parliamentarians is legal and that the requests are subject to technical analysis. The press service said that the appeals are about claims sent for processing, and that “this does not mean that all of them were actually paid.”

Parliamentary demands have been filed in 639 of the state’s 645 municipalities. In the elections, Rodrigo enjoys the support of the majority of mayors – according to the campaign, 511 mayors and more than 2,000 councilors attended a rally in the capital on Monday (19).

See also  Prosecutors of the joint venture are deprived of paid leave to participate in elections

“Get up a little earlier and stay up a little later to ask for votes,” the governor urged while speaking at the event. “I need every one of you in your city,” he said. Rodrigo also stated that he would be able to find out who was on his side.

The resource was used by 59 state deputies and 24 federal deputies, including the chairmen of the parties (Podemos, Solidariada and MDB) that are members of the Tukano coalition. Federal MP Guilherme Moussi (PP-SP) received the most funds with 74.9 million reais. He did not respond to the report.

Even Rodrigo’s allies claim that there was an attempt to attract the PP. The party supports Jair Bolsonaro (PL) at the national level, but in São Paulo, instead of supporting Tarcisio, it has merged with the PSDB.

Among the state winners was Leo Oliveira (MDB) with 49.5 million reais. The MP says that he uses technical and transparent criteria to determine the amendments. “The indication of these resources was mainly for public health, […] affecting the efficiency of public service delivery”.

Haddad’s campaign coordinator, State MP Emidio de Souza (PT) donated 2.5 million reais, the same amount as other members of the PT. In total, PT received 28.6 million reais.

Emidio told Sheet that the MP’s task is to deliver resources to the cities, and that he indicated amendments to “requirements that the government did not prioritize”. “Fortunately, some of them have been taken into account, and who benefits from this is the population,” he says.

Abbreviations for the PT and Tarcísio coalition, such as Republicans (30 million reais) and PSD (25 million reais), are at the bottom of the rankings. At the top are PSDB (292.6 million reais) and União Brasil (215 million reais).

Rodrigo’s deputy, federal deputy Geninho Zuliani (União-SP), released 19.1 million reais. He also did not respond to the message.

See also  Military power in support of presidential candidates

The cost of each demand varies from 15,000 to 20 million reais – two additional amendments to this amount were intended for federal deputy Renata Abreu (Podemos-SP). Renata’s adviser states that Podemos was already at the heart of the government before and that if she had “a prominent position in obtaining resources, this is synonymous with the effectiveness of the mandate.”

The details of parliamentary demands are not published by the government on the transparency portal. After being requested through LAI, management sent thousands of PDFs corresponding to each request – there is no systematization and public transparency regarding these data.

Last year, the data was published after only seven requests through the LAI and physically delivered. More than 5,000 sheets of paper had to be photographed for the reportage.

The transfer is legal, the joint venture government believes

The government stated that “legitimate assistance to elected parliamentarians” was not irregular and that “the newspaper reproduces the speech of the PT candidate”. “In his opinion, the government should stop serving the municipalities and paralyze payments that support medical services until the electoral process is completed.”

The government also says it evaluates demand proposals made by citizens, organizations or through representatives and mayors. “All requests are subject to technical analysis by the secretariats, which assess the possibility of service. The criterion is the public interest. The process is transparent,” he says.

The note also said that, as PT and the Republicans suggested, “it is not true that non-base parties are not served.” “It is impossible to make any comparison with 2020, an atypical and especially relevant year,” he concludes, referring to the pandemic.

Continue Reading

Politics

Politicians, technical managers and the complex balance of democracy

Published

on

Politicians, technical managers and the complex balance of democracy

Even before the formation of the New Republic, in March 1985, a significant number of technical personnel were called upon to form the civilian government of Tancredo Neves, the first post-war dictatorship. The President, however, died, and his replacement, José Sarny, eventually retained the team.

He did this because there was a buzz that the arrival of competent professionals in strategic positions would be enough to transform a country that had 21 years of oppression and repression and that had become a symbol of inefficiency, incompetence and corruption at all levels.

Based on this relevant and almost forgotten detail, Pedro Abramovei and Gabriela Lotta propose for discussion in Balanced Democracy – Politicians and Bureaucrats in Brazil (Companhia das Letras) a still topical issue: solutions to the country’s problems will never appear only statistics and graphs of highly qualified technicians .

The two begin with the personal life and ideas of the political scientist Florestan Fernandez at the beginning of the redemocratization, when he warned that there would be a New Republic if democratic social forces jumped into action and did not leave this role in the hands of the government to solve problems. “They will make a democratic revolution, not a government,” Fernandes says.

In one of his last articles, published six years after the promulgation of the Federal Constitution on October 5, 1988, Fernandes drew attention to the constant possibility of democratic processes being captured by the bureaucracy.

“The association of bureaucrats and technocrats with politicians contributes to the depoliticization of party institutions from right to left. It stimulates personal career ambitions and private projects, divorced from the priority needs of the team. So it reinforces conformism, potential fascism and plutocracy.”

The association of bureaucrats and technocrats with politicians contributes to the depoliticization of party institutions.

In this context, both political scientists argue that the tension that exists between a strong and independent bureaucracy and the natural debate about democracy – with the broad participation of students, workers, indigenous people and many other social forces that are the engines of democracy – reaches the limit. the heart of building a healthy and effective diet.

See also  Elections will be decided in the center, even with polarization, says Andre Estevez | Brazil and politics

In support of the study, they discuss topics such as patrimonialism, meritocracy, and the politicization of the judiciary, in addition to major recent discussions such as the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, drug policy, and the Statute of Indigenous Peoples.

An example of the discrepancy between technocracy and politics can be seen in the anti-drug campaigns. “Alienation, the product of ideology, allows drug policy to be judged on the basis of process indicators, rather than indicators related to the overall policy goals, which in this case would be to improve the health and safety of people,” they write. the authors.

“But policy evaluation is based on the number of prisoners, the number of drugs seized and, in some countries, even the number of deaths. That is, if people use more drugs and die more often from drugs, but the police make more arrests and more arrests, politicians can present their failure as a success.”

The adoption of this inappropriate position can only be explained by ideology – and the power with which it can cause alienation. And here, once again, the belief that the technical approach can solve all problems collapses, the authors say.

Abramovei is a lawyer with an IESP-UERJ PhD in Political Science and has held several positions in two of Lula’s administrations (2003-2011), including National Secretary of Justice. From this personal experience, he reports episodes that help to understand his arguments.

Lotta is Professor of Public Administration at FGV-SP, PhD in Political Science and Researcher at the Center for Metropolitan Studies, and in 2021 she was a Visiting Professor at the University of Oxford. Together they draw conclusions that deserve reflection. , because of the serious moment of instability that runs through the country.

See also  Looking at and Leeds Competition to have two main levels on each individual website in 2021

Since the mid-2000s, they write, the slogan “Brazil needs managers, technicians, not politicians” has gained momentum and has become one of the central issues in the elections of the last decade, when politics has come to be seen as an expression, not of democracy, but of corruption.

Since the 2000s, the slogan “Brazil needs managers, technicians, not politicians” has been gaining momentum and has become one of the central issues in the elections of the last decade.

“The idea was reinforced that public policy decisions could be made by well-educated managers of any ideology: the difference between left and right would be insignificant if it existed at all.”

They explain that for every problem in society there must be the right public policy, which must be determined and implemented by a specialist who can do without dialogue with various sections of society. Of course, they argue, there is no good politics without good governance.

“Public managers must technically create the most suitable scenarios for politicians who, legitimized by voting, will make their own choice. But in many cases, some of these managers assume the role of changing the state and politics without having the proper legitimacy to do so, relying on the authority of the position to which they have risen by “merit”. In doing so, they undermine politics from within and slowly destroy democracy.”

The period following the 1988 Constitution, the authors write, demonstrates that patterns of state-society relations—clientelism, corporatism, and bureaucratic isolation—can only be overcome through structural reforms that will replace them with what belongs to a democratic republican country: “the universalism of procedures and participation.”

See also  Coronavirus: Portugal added to UK's protected travel list as Croatia is eliminated

The examples analyzed in the book, they add, also highlight the risks of a technical and meritocratic discourse that seeks to legitimize itself at the expense of politics and that actually hides individual interests or certain groups.

Pedro Abramovei and Gabriela Lotta argue that the structural problems of the Brazilian state will not be solved by meritocratic discourse or by well-meaning and well-educated young people who, in their offices, devote themselves to the technical analysis of measures to eradicate corruption and improve the state.

“For the fulfillment by the State of the purposes set forth in the Constitution, the building of a free, just and solidary society; eradicate poverty; in order to reduce inequality and promote the common good without discrimination, it is necessary to bet on both technology and politics.”

In order for the state to fulfill the goals set out in the Constitution, it is necessary to rely on both technical and political

The book is recommended by two former presidents of the republic. “Politics is fundamental to help overcome historical challenges and build a democracy that confronts its past of violence, does not oppress minorities, and guarantees public participation in decisions about the direction of the country,” Lula writes. In his opinion, “equilibrium democracy” is an indispensable reflection for those who fight for a just Brazil.

Fernando Enrique Cardoso emphasizes that the work combines solid academic research and the experience of those who have worked in government. The authors, he says, offer an original and relevant contribution “to understanding how to seek an unsustainable balance in our democratic construction.”

Service:
Balanced Democracy – Politicians and Bureaucrats in Brazil
Pedro Abramovei and Gabriela Lotta
176 pages
Hard copy: BRL 69.90.
E-book: 39.90 reais.
Companhia das Letras

Continue Reading

Politics

Learn about electoral law mechanisms that improve the political process

Published

on

published on 25.09.2022 03:55


(Credit: Minervino Junior/CB/DA Press)

Elections to the Chamber of Deputies will determine much more than the list of Brazilians elected parliamentarians. It will also indicate which parties will have access to party and election funds, which will be eligible for free advertising space on radio and television, and which subtitles will take the lead in the National Congress.

To improve the selection of parliamentarians and the qualifications of parties, the electoral legislation has established a number of mechanisms. This list includes rules such as the restrictive clause, the formation of federations and coalitions, in addition to the electoral coefficient and the party coefficient.

The barrier clause is important to avoid the appearance of rental subtitles or subtitles without ideological and programmatic identity. This is an incentive to build stronger parties, which experts say makes it easier for voters to identify the policies and ideologies that candidates stand for.

Another positive aspect of the barrier clause, or productivity, is the greater ability of governments to negotiate agreements with parliamentary blocs.

Understanding the mechanism of proportional elections, which determines the deputies who will be elected, is not a trivial task. But, in a simplistic way, we can say that this type of election guarantees that all the votes counted will be taken into account, if not the election of the chosen candidate, then the party will form a large bench.

The calculation that determines the number of votes required for an election is the electoral coefficient. The number of seats each party will be entitled to will depend on the party coefficient.

See also  Looking at and Leeds Competition to have two main levels on each individual website in 2021

understand how it works

barrier clause

The regulation, effective in 2022, establishes a minimum performance – a minimum number of votes.
for each party – for subtitles to have access to congressional leadership, campaigning and
party fund money.

To pass the point, a party must elect at least 11 federal deputies in at least 9 states (or DF).

Another way to get around the clause is when the legend has at least
2% of valid votes nationwide. In addition, the party must receive at least 1% of valid votes in at least nine constituent entities of the Federation.

In terms of votes, this means, roughly speaking, that each party would need 2.4 million votes to overcome the barrier clause. This number takes into account 20% abstentions and 5% blank and zero votes, the averages recorded in the last election.

The efficiency clause aims to consolidate the representation of the Brazilian party, which currently has 23 parties in the Chamber of Deputies. In the next election, parties will need to increase the number of votes in order to comply with the rule. In 2026, it will be necessary to reach the figure of 2.5% or 13 congressmen, in 2030 3% or 15 federal deputies.

Coalitions and federations

This year, for the first time, parties were able to form federations. This is an alternative to coalitions banned since 2017 in proportional disputes. For most positions – mayor,
governor, senator and president of the republic – the parties can still form a coalition.

See also  Fesmepar discusses trade union perspectives and current Brazilian political and economic scenario at UGT - Oeste meeting | News

Approved in 2021, the federation is an alliance of two or more parties acting as one, with a common charter and program, registered with the TSE. The federation must exist for at least four years.

During this period, the parties must act together throughout the country, in unified action.
also in the National Congress. Unlike former coalitions, federations cannot be
closed shortly after the election. While parties retain operational and financial autonomy, the obligation to stand as a bloc in Congress or the next municipal elections represents a major change in model.

selective coefficient

The electoral quotient is obtained by dividing the total number of valid votes in the election of a deputy of the federation by the number of seats to which each unit of the federation is entitled in the Chamber of Deputies. The same formula applies to state meetings.

For example, if a state is entitled to 10 seats in the House of Deputies, and the actual votes for a federal deputy were 1 million, each federal seat will be filled by a factor of 100,000 votes.

party coefficient

The party coefficient determines the number of seats each party or federation will be entitled to in parliament.
Chamber of Deputies or in state assemblies. To get this number, all the votes of candidates from the party, federation or legend are added up. It is then divided by the selective coefficient. For example, if a party received 150,000 votes with an electoral coefficient of 100,000 votes, then the party coefficient would be 1.5 (150/100). That is, the party elects its most voted deputy. The remaining 50,000 votes may or may not guarantee second place.

See also  Coronavirus: Portugal added to UK's protected travel list as Croatia is eliminated

Under the rules in force for 2022, all candidates must receive at least 10% of the electoral coefficient.


Continue Reading

Trending