Connect with us

Politics

Coronavirus: civil servants ‘must return to offices quickly’

Published

on

Coronavirus: civil servants 'must return to offices quickly'

Image copyright
PA Media

The government has called on Whitehall bosses to “act quickly” to bring more employees back to the office.

The letter, which the BBC saw, said it “strongly encourages” attendance through a rotation system, arguing that it would be “extremely beneficial.”

This follows criticism that too few civil servants working from home due to the coronavirus have returned to their jobs despite easing isolation.

But the unions called the government’s position outdated.

They say most civil servants should expect to continue working from home until the end of the year and that they fear an increased risk of coronavirus infection when they return with colleagues.

Analysis of mobile phone data for the last month is offered only 17% of UK workers returned to the office.

Government launched a campaign encourage people to return to work after business leaders, including the head of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), warned that city centers can become “ghost towns”

According to CBI’s Caroline Fairbairn, thousands of businesses that rely on passing trade suffer while offices are empty.

But Alex Brazier, chief executive of financial stability at the Bank of England, warned that the government don’t expect a “sharp return” to a “dense office environment”.

The government says it wants 80% of civil servants to be able to visit their regular workplaces at least once a week by the end of September.

And Prime Minister Boris Johnson asked officials to report on progress on a weekly basis.

In a letter sent to permanent secretaries – senior officials – of government departments, Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark Sedwill and Alex Chisholm, Chief Operating Officer of the Civil Service, say that “bringing more people back to work in a Covid-safe way will improve our government services. “.

They add: “We have seen a decline in the level of social interaction between our colleagues, with the loss of some of the spontaneous interaction and cross-fertilization between teams that stimulate innovation and support a common goal.”

Image copyright
FDA

Image caption

Dave Penman says that ministers behave like “Luddites.”

But they say that the safety of personnel “remains our primary concern” and that return to the workplace will be discussed with unions and personnel groups.

The letter goes on to say: “Departments that are still below their departmental limits should now take quick steps to try to get more staff back into the office in a safe Covid manner, and take advantage of the return to schools this month and increased accessibility to public transport. … “

The FDA union, which represents senior government officials, said this week that it estimates 30% to 40% will be able to return to the office by the end of the year.

Leader Dave Penman accused ministers of being “like Luddites” in an era when technology made it easier to work from home.

And Mark Servotka, general secretary of the Union of Public and Commercial Services, said he was prepared to view strikes as “a last resort” if workers’ health and safety were “compromised.”

Meanwhile, outsourcing firm Capita – a major government contractor – plans to permanently close more than a third of its UK offices.

See also  Carmen is the rapporteur in the trial against 100 years of secrecy over Pasuello's punishment.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Politics

Facebook expands transparency measures for social ads in elections

Published

on

Meta, the company in charge of managing Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, announced this Thursday, March 19, the expansion of the policy of transparency in advertisements on social issues in Brazil, which is another measure of the platform for the 2022 elections in Brazil.

Profiles and pages wishing to advertise in the areas of civil and social rights, crime, weapons, economics, education, environmental policy, health care, political values ​​and governance, immigration, security and foreign policy will need to go through an authorization process. and the posts will have a tag indicating who is paying for those ads. The measures will take effect in June.

On a global scale, this tool was already used in the elections in the Philippines, which took place in May this year. Photo: Reuters.

Labels have been used for political or election advertising since 2018 and became mandatory in 2020. Stadaoresource used by federal deputies e preliminary presidential candidates.

Any user can access the information in the ad library where the posts are stored. In this content, you can access data about the age group, gender and location of the audience.

“Greater transparency leads to more authentic interactions and more authentic advertising,” said Meta Strategic Response program manager Debs Delbart. “We understand that the more transparency on the platform, the more people will responsibly use our services, because the data will be available for everyone to review.”

When the measure goes into effect, any social, political, and election ads on Facebook and Instagram that don’t have any of the labels can be removed and stored in the ad library for seven years.

See also  PGR protests against Silveira's pre-trial detention appeal | Politics

According to Debs Delbart, the list of social categories has not yet been disclosed to the Higher Electoral Court (TSE), and adds that the topics on the list may be adjusted as the election year progresses.

The platform will be assisted by artificial intelligence, a team from Brazil and an international group that regulates this content. Users can also file complaints. At the global level, Delbart reports, this tool has already been used in the Philippine elections, which were held in May this year in Mexico and Chile.

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics, according to thinker Arduini

Published

on

Politics, according to thinker Arduini

“(…) Politics ennobles and expresses the feeling of citizenship.” (Father Juvenal Arduini, sociologist and professor)

A wonderful being, endowed with extraordinary wisdom, he knew how to put the talents of the spirit at the service of the world, public affairs, rejected in the division of earthly goods, bestowed by nature or produced by human labor. His name was Juvenal Arduini. Priest, writer, sociologist, professor, incendiary tribune. I enjoyed the privilege of a long coexistence, very fruitful for me in terms of benefits, with this wonderful master. Once, while paying my respects to him, I told him that I consider him the Brazilian father of Lebre. Refresh the concept. Today I am fully convinced – looking at the parts of his apostolic work and the writings that came out from his brilliant pen, and the teachings conveyed in his civilly impartial speech – that it is quite reasonable to also proclaim that the aforementioned Father Lebret, the famous thinker, was the French Juvenal Arduino.

Remembering a character who occupied such an important place in intellectual life, endowed with enviable humanistic and spiritual gifts, a very dear friend, my comrade, I allow myself to replace, with noticeable benefit for the reader, during these periods of tense articulation aimed at holding presidential elections, which have a great meaning for all of us, my commentary in words taken from the vast and valuable work left by the master. These are energetic, timely, and relevant thoughts, as we shall see later.

Let’s. Here is what Juvenal said: “During elections (…) it is appropriate to think about politics. The word “politics” comes from the Greek “poleteia”. “Polis” means a city, a locality. And “polites” is a citizen. It turns out that initially politics ennobles and expresses a sense of citizenship.

See also  PR is associated with the 30th anniversary of CES as a "hot spot" of the political system.

Politics is a highly social phenomenon and contributes to the development of society as a whole. Politics means unification, coexistence and union. Politics exists to bring people together, to integrate groups and nations to respond to social challenges. True politics encourages essential socialization and eliminates bitter feuds between people, organizations and parties.

Politics is organically connected with the people. He is called to serve the people, and not to subordinate them to petty interests. The Brazilian constitution was bold and clear when it came to the relationship between the government and the people. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Constitution proclaims: “All power proceeds from the people, who exercise it through elected representatives or directly in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” There is a lapidary constitutional declaration that elevates the modern nation. Power comes from the people. And this is also carried out by the people through voters or directly. Power is in the people, it remains in the people. The people can give functions to politicians, but do not transfer power to them. Strictly speaking, power belongs to the people, not to the rulers. There are politicians who act as if they hold the power that belongs to the people. This is the usurpation of the people’s power.

There are many types of policies. Humanized, social, ethical and purposeful policy towards the population. Prostituted, corrupt and perverted politics. Authoritarian, tyrannical politics and submissive, slave politics. There is a serious policy that meets the needs of the population, and a corrupt policy that appropriates the resources that belong to the poor. (…) “Political reality itself is a human, social, cultural and historical value. A sound policy is necessary for society. This is not about canceling the policy, but about cleaning it up. It is necessary to save the political potential of the people. There is an urgent need to establish (…) a policy of justice, not poverty. (…) The politics of ethics (…) The politics of life, not death. Politics must be devoted to the cry of suffering humanity and historical responsibility.”

See also  You have to be very, very dumb to fight for politicians.

Continue Reading

Politics

Libyan Prime Minister Claims ‘Political Suicide by Coup’ – Middle East Monitor

Published

on

Libyan Prime Minister Claims 'Political Suicide by Coup' - Middle East Monitor

Abdel Hamid Dbeibeh, prime minister of Libya’s recognized government, announced what he called “the political suicide of the coup project.”

Dbeibe’s comments follow clashes in the capital, Tripoli, between government of national unity troops and paramilitaries linked to the fictitious Tobruk parliament, which has elected Fathi Bashaga as its new prime minister.

A few hours earlier, Bashaga had arrived in the city to take office.

Dbeibe refused to hand over power, except for a government elected under the guidelines of the Libyan Political Dialogue Forum, affirming: “Without elections, there is no future.”

The United Nations (UN) is facilitating negotiations in Cairo to reach consensus on a constitutional basis for holding “as soon as possible” legislative and executive elections in the North African nation.

Dbeibeh agreed to open a security corridor for Bashagi to leave the capital “for the simple reason that one drop of Libyan blood is more important than any greed or authority.”

READ: Dbeibe government accuses Amnesty of ‘politicizing’ report against Libyan interests

“The government continues to fulfill its responsibilities as the only guarantee for future elections in Libya,” the prime minister repeated. “The government will remain that way until the election.”

At the time, Dbeibeh assured foreign diplomats that the security situation in Tripoli was “stable” and that work could continue as usual.

On Tuesday evening (17), Bashaga called a press conference in the eastern city of Sirte, where he said he had left the capital to prevent casualties.

“We don’t move forces or use weapons; we were going to arrive alone without an escort,” Bashaga said. “We don’t want bloodshed; it is impossible for me to take power through massacre. We will keep on fighting until we reach our goal; however peacefully.

See also  Carmen is the rapporteur in the trial against 100 years of secrecy over Pasuello's punishment.

Bashaga claimed to have driven into Tripoli in two civilian vehicles. The stalemate has persisted since March, when the congress in Tobruk chose him to remove Dbeibeh.

“I have the right, as prime minister, elected by the legislature, to go to the capital,” he repeated. “The government will begin its work tomorrow, headquartered in Sirte, and we will go to Tripoli if we are sure that our arrival will not shed a single drop of blood.”

On Twitter, Bashaga accused the government of national unity of “using force” to prevent a transfer of power. “Although we entered the capital without the use of violence or force of arms, welcomed by the people of Tripoli, we were surprised by the dangerous military escalation of groups associated with the government, whose mandate has expired.”

The Deputy Prime Minister added: “Threatening the security of civilians is a crime under the law, and we cannot contribute to the infringement of the security of the capital and its inhabitants.”

This was reported to the agency by a source in the 444th brigade of the Libyan army. Anadolu that their commander accompanied Bashaga, leading him out of the city. “The position of the brigade regarding the outbreak of conflict is clear: we reject any bloodshed or instability in the country.”

Libya is contested by two separate governments and there are fears of a return to civil war.

The UN hopes that a general election will help end the conflict that has plagued the country since 2011, when long-lived dictator Muammar Gaddafi was ousted by popular uprising and outside interference.

See also  MPs: Furlough "needs to be extended" to avoid massive unemployment.

Continue Reading

Trending