Connect with us


Matt Hancock indicates ‘no excuse’ for men and women not to return to their desks



Health Secretary Matt Hancock said this morning that only a 'relatively low' number of people had caught coronavirus at their place of work

Matt Hancock confronted criticism nowadays soon after telling employees to get back to their workplaces due to the fact the risk of catching coronavirus there is negligible.

The health and fitness secretary said formal data – which has not been created public – confirmed only a ‘relatively low’ variety of men and women had contacted Covid-19 at their position of get the job done. 

But industry experts claimed the purpose workplace transmission remained small was simply because most individuals worked from residence for months and a large chunk of the workforce was nonetheless performing so.

Just one referred to as Mr Hancock’s opinions ‘cavalier’, whilst another mentioned his blasé frame of mind to Covid in the office could ‘certainly’ see workplaces put up with outbreaks in the future.

Mr Hancock produced the reviews right after he was requested no matter if the Uk will adhere to the guide of France and call for encounter masks to be worn in all workplaces. 

The new policies in France are due to occur into outcome on September 1 and will need encounter coverings to be worn in all shared and enclosed workspaces, which include open-prepare and shared offices.

The Overall health Secretary said ‘we are not at this time considering executing that’.  

Professor Paul Hunter, an epidemiologist at the University of East Anglia, instructed MailOnline: ‘If most workplace employees ended up even now working at property right up until not long ago or are even even now working at residence, then of class workplace based transmission isn’t likely to aspect in the stats.

‘For any predicament to enjoy an crucial aspect in transmission the people have really bought to be in that situation.

‘Clearly the United kingdom requirements to get back again to work but merely relying on info to date when a lot of men and women have been performing at household is not an adequate measure of threat.’ 

Keith Neal, an emeritus professor of infectious illnesses at the University of Nottingham, explained to MailOnline: ‘Working for house minimises you and your family’s danger from Covid-19 and flu. 

‘Working from will keep down the total variety of transmissions in the total region. 

‘If you can perform from residence devoid of any detriment then it is reasonable to carry on performing this.’

See also  Running from bullshit: fear of cancellation drives young people away from political debate on social media - Politics

Just very last month two clusters had been linked back to a contact centre in Port Glasgow in Scotland and a pharmacy in Better Glasgow.

Numerous super-spreader events have happened in factories and food processing plants elsewhere about the United kingdom.

Still the Health Secretary explained currently that information confirmed ‘very largely’ the illness is getting passed on when 1 family meets with yet another ‘usually in one of their homes’.  

Health and fitness Secretary Matt Hancock explained this morning that only a ‘relatively low’ selection of men and women experienced caught coronavirus at their spot of work

He claimed domestic transmission is ‘the root of passing on this virus in this country’.  

The Authorities ditched its lockdown get the job done from home advice at the begin of August as ministers inspired personnel to return to places of work. 

The determination was manufactured amid escalating fears that ongoing operating from house risked the loss of life of city and metropolis centres as firms reliant on commuter footfall wrestle to survive. 

Mr Hancock currently advised there is no cause for staff not to be back in the business office. 

Asked if the United kingdom will stick to the guide of France on face coverings in workplaces, Mr Hancock informed BBC Breakfast: ‘We frequently glance at the scientific assistance and the answer listed here is that we are not now thinking of accomplishing that. 

‘And the motive is that the proof from NHS Examination and Trace that we had been chatting about for the place people today catch the ailment is that really mostly they capture it from a person household assembly another household, typically in one of their houses. 

‘So it is that home transmission that is the core, the root of passing on this virus in this nation. 

‘The volume of folks who have caught it in workplaces is relatively low, we believe, from the proof that we have acquired.’ 

But Dr Simon Clarke, affiliate professor of cellular microbiology at the University of Studying, said: ‘Only a thirty day period in the past, Matt Hancock stated that facial area masks in the office have been ”something we have seemed at and rejected”. 

See also  Honey greater therapy for coughs and colds than antibiotics, research claims | Science

‘Now his perspective seems to have softened somewhat to being some thing that ”we are not presently considering”, leaving open the prospect of a improve to plan in the potential.

‘Other than arguments over the usefulness of masks in a office, it misses the issue to state that place of work transmission is fewer sizeable than those people that consider place in the home. 

‘While that may well effectively be correct, any transmission spreads the virus and pushes up the R range. The virus wants to be taken into households by a person and they will have had to decide on it up from somewhere else.

‘Therefore, even a solitary place of work transmission could direct to several onward infections in a relatives, domestic or other location.

‘In the absence of ideal data, it appears instead cavalier to dismiss workplaces as a resource of opportunity infection, but label stores as better threat and requiring masks, even although interactions with folks are considerably extra fleeting and considerably less personal.’

Professor Adam Finn, professor of paediatrics at the University of Bristol, extra: ‘Everyone in my NHS Have confidence in is donning masks at operate, together with when in office areas, and I am strongly encouraging my team associates to do likewise in my lab. 

‘Most individuals seem happy sufficient to do so the moment they understand the contemplating behind it – particularly, that everybody is undertaking it to shield absolutely everyone else.

‘The govt may have evidence and other reasons for not wishing to compel folks to do this, but I consider people today need to at least be inspired to don a mask whenever they are sharing room with many others.’

Professor Paul Hunter advised MailOnline: ‘For any scenario to play an important element in transmission the folks have really acquired to be in that circumstance. 

‘It is a bit like indicating that due to the fact there have been no instances connected with church buildings in the Uk from April to July then churches are protected and we should motivate everybody to go to church. 

‘The reality that church buildings ended up closed for worship throughout that time may perhaps have experienced additional than a small to do with the reality that there were no instances there and so this gives no genuine evidence for regardless of whether or not church buildings are safe. 

See also  Dinailton Criticizes Political and Economic Power of Situationists in OAB-BA Election

‘I know some workplaces have ongoing to run but frequently with instead less employees who were ready self-distance.

‘We do know that there have been business office associated outbreaks in other places in the entire world and in the British isles. So business office centered transmission has been recognised to manifest.

‘Clearly the British isles requires to get back again to work but simply just relying on details to date when numerous people have been doing the job at home is not an satisfactory measure of chance.

‘Employers have to undertake a suitable risk evaluation of their work spots and then act on this to minimize risk to their workers and consider how to shield any especially susceptible staff members. Or else we are certainly likely to see operate environments element a lot more really in the long run.’

Mr Hancock’s reviews arrived after Tony Blair warned of the ‘consequential damage’ which will be performed to firms in urban centres if personnel do not return to perform. 

The previous key minister explained to Sky News he had not too long ago spoken to another person who performs in the Town of London at a agency with a lot more than 300 staff members exactly where only 8 members of workers have returned to the office.

Mr Blair reported the only way to give personnel the ‘confidence’ to return is to roll out mass tests so that people can be positive that they and their colleagues do not have the virus.  

He reported: ‘That is your issue. If you consider of the consequential destruction that does to all the other corporations who are dependent on people men and women being in these spots. 

‘When you stack all of this up if you want to give individuals the confidence, not just the permission, but the self-confidence I just you should not see how you do that unless you do the screening at the scale that we have mentioned.’ 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Senador é alvo de homophobia e nega relação com personal trainer



Senador é alvo de homophobia e nega relação com personal trainer

O senador Styvenson Valentim (Podemos-RN) se tornou alvo de comentários homofóbicos em suas redes sociais após ter o nome envolvido em rumores de que teria um caso amoroso com um personal trainer, o que teria supostamente resultado no fim do casamento de 13 anos com uma empresaria.

ao UOL, o parlamentar disse a motivação do divórcio e boato. Ele conta que o casamento terminou devido ao desgaste gerado por sua entrada na politica em 2018, quando foi eleito senador por Rio Grande do Norte.

“Minha esposa não suportou, preferiu dar continuidade a vida sozinha, pois as pessoas não respeitam a privacidade dos políticos. Isso afeta a família. Qual a esposa que quer continuar casada? [A falta de privacidade] cansa as pessoas que não pediram para estar aqui e ela casou comigo quando eu era policial militar. Essa mudança de vida, ela não conseguiu acompanhar”, declarou Valentim, que se diz hétero.

Alvo de comentarios homophobicos

Os boatos que ligaram o nome do parlamentar ao suposto caso extraconjugal ganharam repercussão no Twitter, gerando ataques preconceituosos nas publicações do político, com conotação homofóbica. O caso viralizou após participar de um programa de rádio local para desmentir o boato.

“Adora uma espada, né senador? Posando de machão”, escreveu um. “Ele adora levar ferro, gente. Eita senador bom de obra”, postou outro.

ao UOL, Styvenson Valentim disse não se ofender com os ataques e que não pretende processar os internautas. O politico, por outro lado, lamentou o fato de a temática da sexualidade ser tratada em tom de brincadeira.

See also  Sudan's prime minister steps down and country’s political stalemate deepens

“Dentro de quatro paredes é sua vida, sua particularidade. Por que não? Não quer dizer que já tive [relação homoafetiva]mas que respeito. Não sei o dia de amanhã, não procuro em redes sociais, dou entrevista porque o tema e serio, mas as pessoas levaram para a brincadeira. É um tema que envolve minorias, que os brasileiros querem respeito, igualdade.
Styvenson Valentim

“Vi muita gente da esquerda e defensores das minorias fazendo brincadeiras, memes, com postagens sobre a minha masculinidade. Se eu tivesse dado uma resposta diferente, do tipo ‘não toco em homem’, seria tachado de homofóbico. Se eu fosse gay, já teria dito, não teria porquê esconder”, concluiu.

Continue Reading


Guerreiro is the number 1 Facebook politician in San Carlos with over 61,000 followers.



Guerreiro is the number 1 Facebook politician in San Carlos with over 61,000 followers.
Credit: personal file

Former advisor Leandro Guerreiro passed the 61,000 Facebook followers mark this Thursday (20). Guerreiro remains the number 1 politician in San Carlos in terms of social media resonance.

Guerreiro has been leading the political resonance in the city’s social networks for 7 years, ahead of competitors. One more detail: the content published by the former adviser circulates organically, without any feed.

“I can only thank the public for loving me. I believe that my speech reflects the desire of the population to see someone who truly advocates a better quality of life for the population,” Guerreiro emphasized.

The video of Guerreiro’s speech, whether he was a parliamentarian, a radio host or the director of the Secretariat for Children and Youth, was watched by millions of people scattered throughout Brazil.

Guerreiro was elected councilor in 2016 with 2,869 votes. In 2020, he ran for mayor of San Carlos and received 4,416 votes. In addition, Guerreiro has also received a response on TikTok, where he has already amassed 23,000 followers and millions of views in just a few months of using the platform.

Read too

Last news

See also  “It’s political noise that pollutes the economy,” says Paulo Gedes | Economy
Continue Reading


Cyberattacks are the political weapon of the moment; and now? – 20.01.2022



Cyberattacks are the political weapon of the moment;  and now?  - 20.01.2022

In the middle heated political debate over mandatory passport vaccines at the end of 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) suffered more than one cyberattack that deprived Brazilians of access to proof of immunization. The case has revived the debate about how cybercriminal activities are being amplified as a political weapon.

ConectSUS is up and running again after 13 days of inactivity. Even a month after the attack data released since December 10 is not yet available on platforms in the folderAccording to the Ministry of Health, in a note sent to Incline. The return will be gradual.

The digital security experts heard from the talk are unanimous: in the political game, hacking attacks can increase polarization, breed distrust in service delivery (especially public services), and create a war of narratives, as happens with the phenomenon of fake news on social networks and messaging services (such as like WhatsApp and Telegram).

“The history of cybersecurity is the history of politics, maybe‘ says Joan Varon, Executive Director Coding Rights, which deals with human rights on the web.

“If we look at the chronology of the attacks, then there is a huge list among politicians, among states, such as the United States, Russia, Iran, China, Saudi Arabia. [de dados] which have political goals, the goals of disputes maybe. It’s in the DNA of attacks. Looking at this story, we see that there is a kind of cyber war going on,” he adds. More recently, Ukrainian government websites have been attacked, exacerbating the country’s conflicts with Russia and Belarus.

From January 2021 CSIS recorded more than 100 cyber attacks worldwide (Center for Strategic and International Studies), an organization that studies public policy strategies. The institution has raised attacks on government agencies, defense agencies and technology companies, as well as digital crimes that have resulted in millions of losses for some companies.

See also  “It’s political noise that pollutes the economy,” says Paulo Gedes | Economy

political weapon

Cyber ​​attacks per se are not new, but the digitization of communications and government services is increasing their frequency and impact. As governments become more computerized and many employees work from home, and networks become more vulnerable, risks khaki and the number of intrusions into the system is increasing. Therefore, concern for cybersecurity should be a priority, emphasize the respondents.

“If you want to paralyze the work of medical services, you can deprive people of the opportunity to work or go to hospitals by turning off the information from the air. The impact on the public system is much greater due to the current problems with digital technologies,” says lawyer Christian Perrone, coordinator of ITS Rio (Instituto Tecnologia e Sociedade do Rio de Janeiro).

In Brazil, the debate about cybersecurity – and therefore cyberattacks – is increasingly a political issue, especially in the context of the pandemic, when many government services have gone digital.

“It was the flag of politicians, but there was no such concern from the security side,” Perrone assesses. “When we start discussing technology policy or politics through technology elements, the incident becomes politicized,” he says.

One of the examples cited by the specialist concerns ballot boxes: it is not about elections, but about the technological apparatus and the possibility of ballot box falsification. When the HEC (Supreme Electoral Court) was the victim of a cyberattack ahead of the 2020 municipal elections, the incident raised questions about the security of the electoral process.

In Iran, a hacker attack disrupted the supply of gasoline to the country for five days. Government officials have accused the United States of being responsible for the instability, further fueling tensions between the two countries. In recent years, the country has experienced a number of cyberattacks, some of which were state-sponsored. according to The Washington Post, and other groups who want to expose government abuses.

See also  Iranian President appoints First Vice President for Political Affairs, subject to US sanctions - News

“Cyber ​​attacks have become political weapons on the agenda of several groups, especially those that benefit from strategies of fear, uncertainty and doubt,” emphasizes Ronaldo Lemos, director of ITS, in his column in Folha de S.Paulo.

“As the use of online disinformation campaigns has been rendered obsolete by platforms and the Supreme Court, there is a shift towards attacks on government entities as a way to create social consequences,” he writes.

For Lemos, there is a tendency to use cybercrime for political purposes, as it can be used to undermine trust in state institutions or the opposition.

Especially since elections are taking place in Brazil this year, Perrone believes that there may be information security incidents, whether for direct or indirect political reasons.

“These attacks can be accompanied by disinformation campaigns,” says Perrone. “They won’t disappear because we haven’t found a final solution yet, but it could create space for bigger campaigns and more opportunities for disinformation, conspiracy theories to emerge.”

As for Joana Varon, we might see more cyberattacks that could show political battles, as happened with MS and TSE, and disinformation and fake news campaigns will continue.

“We can repeat what happened in the US elections, when far-right groups actively used social networks and various telecommunications infrastructures to spread disinformation,” he says. “This is a tactic that is already established and will be used in the next election.”

The consequences of cyberattacks go further

Major political cyberattacks, like disinformation and fake news campaigns, affect more than just technological systems, says Pano Giannakogeorgos, an associate professor at New York University and director of the Master’s Program in Cybersecurity.

See also  Honey greater therapy for coughs and colds than antibiotics, research claims | Science

“These are crimes that affect the human mind, they try to influence people,” he explains. “We will see this more and more. With a society fragmented for socio-economic reasons and more and more people connected to the Internet, there will also be more misinformation, only worse because we have more and more sophisticated technologies such as deepfakes and the use of artificial intelligence,” he says. .

There is a solution?

Experts believe that to mitigate the consequences of cyber attacks and security measures should be the subject of public discussion.

“It should be a broad discussion with attackers who are identifying attack trends, because technology evolves, and with it attacks, vulnerabilities, operating systems need to be updated,” says Varon.

Leticia Piccolotto, public administration specialist and magazine columnist Incline, believes that attacks also need to be dealt with with greater transparency.

“The recent episode that affected the Ministry of Health has not yet been clarified. In other words, we do not know how, why and what were the consequences of the attack. And, more importantly: no plan has yet been presented to ensure that a new event or even more serious – if possible – as this will not happen again anytime soon,” writes Piccolotto.

“The lack of transparency regarding attacks also contributes to a sense of insecurity among the population and the creation of false narratives that cast doubt on the work of various state institutions,” he concludes.

Continue Reading