Connect with us

Top News

Trump scoffs at science – and wants his scientists to do the same

Published

on

Trump scoffs at science - and wants his scientists to do the same

Within hours, Vice President Mike Pence, head of the White House coronavirus task force, said the CDC would issue new guidelines.

“The president said today we just do not want the guidelines to be too difficult, and that is the reason why, next week, the CDC will issue a new set of tools, five different documents that will provide further clarity about the guidelines going forward,” Pence told reporters.

Responses from the vice president and other high officials to the ongoing White House task force’s directive, which is very contrary to the reality of the new diary of 60,000 new cases of the virus, underline how the government is more directed to meet non-binding demands. President rather than giving honest accounting of the crisis and taking steps that can defeat it.

Robert Redfield, who leads the CDC and runs on a constant line, is often unsuccessful, under intense pressure from Trump, stressing that the new guidelines should not slow down Trump’s push to reopen all schools within weeks.

“I want to make it very clear that what is not the intention of the CDC guidelines is to be used as an excuse to keep schools closed,” Redfield said, promising to work with schools and officials to propose an optimal and safe opening plan.

“Personally it will be very disappointing for me, and, I know, my agent, if we see that individuals use these guidelines as an excuse not to reopen our school.”

His comments came a day after Trump demanded that all schools be reopened in the fall, then the President was confused when asked how this could be achieved safely given the deteriorating conditions.

And they ask this question: What is the use of the CDC guidelines if conditions are so loose that they are mostly meaningless or cannot be used as an excuse to close schools if basic safety recommendations are not met?

The fate of American children

In addition to the difficulties millions of Americans expelled from work by stopping are introduced to stem the spread of the virus, the need to bring children back to school is perhaps the most important task facing the government. The prospect of losing critical years of learning, coupled with the psychological and emotional effects of being stuck at home, has a painful effect on the nation’s children.

See also  Facebook outlines plans to increase workforce diversity

And parents cannot commit to returning to work, in many cases, before their children can return to class, further hampering hopes of economic recovery.

But no one has been authorized to explain how the full-time school that Trump demands is possible given the need for social distance in crowded school buildings and risks for teachers, who are far more susceptible to Covid-19 complications than their students.

The president – who seems to have no obligation to lead other than to vote aggressively – also ignores the fact that children can bring the virus home to more vulnerable parents and grandparents, a factor that can lead to new outbreaks of disease in America. fall down.

Dr. Ashish Jha, faculty director at Harvard’s Global Health Institute, warned that the CDC guidelines had become a minimum requirement for opening schools and warned of long-term educational disasters if the opening was not planned well.

“I think the CDC’s recommendations are really basic and, in fact, I think they need to go further. Look, you can open a school wherever you want. That’s really not a debate,” Jha told CNN’s “The Lead. ” “The question is can you keep the school open? Can you prevent a massive outbreak between teachers and staff and children? And if we don’t do what the CDC asks, and more, the schools will it is closed by Columbus Day and they will be closed for a long time. That is what we must avoid, and we don’t. We cannot bluff through this; we must let science move it. “

The school controversy recalls Trump’s demands to open the country

The building controversy over the CDC’s school closure guidelines began to recall health agency guidelines compiled this spring to ensure the safe opening of the country’s economy – which many governors ignored at the urging of a desperate president to revive his election. hope.

This is also a reminder of Trump’s position on wearing masks, weeks after he announced new CDC guidelines asking Americans to wear face masks in public places where they cannot get social distance – then immediately cut off suggestions by saying he himself would not do it.

See also  Ghislaine Maxwell requests bail as she awaits trial

Pence’s quick accommodation of Trump’s complaint on Wednesday was important, because the President did not provide logical or scientific arguments for his opposition to the CDC’s guidelines. He only said the agent asked the school to do “impractical things” – steps that would no doubt contradict his request to open the school no matter what.

Anthony Fauci, the government’s top contagious disease expert, who Trump reprimanded this week for a round of truth-telling about the worsening situation in the interview, was not present at the briefing.

Another key member of the task force, Dr. Deborah Birx, present. He said he saw “encouraging” signs in hot-spot states such as Florida, Texas and Arizona, for example citing a decrease in positive levels in test results. But Birx added that countries that had problems had to return to the first phase of their opening plan, a statement that made him at odds with Trump’s warning that America must continue to open the economy.

CDC officials told CNN in recent months that they felt “muzzled” because their suggestions had been ignored by the White House who were more concerned about the President’s political requirements than coordinated efforts to reduce the virus.

Early in the pandemic, the agency got Trump’s anger by ruining the initial coronavirus testing plan. A high official, Nancy Messonnier, warned Americans in February that disruptions to daily life might be “severe” – contrary to the first of Trump’s many inaccurate remarks that they have nothing to worry about.

In May, the White House refused to implement the 17-page CDC plan on the safe reopening of the country that contained detailed recommendations for churches and schools when the President demanded a speedy opening.

The White House has denied disconnecting with the CDC

Trump is now in an open dispute with health officials because the virus is raging

Despite the apparent dispute between the President and his health experts, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany denied there was tension between Trump and the CDC.

“I will note that the CDC is very much on the same page as the President, which is why you heard the CDC director today underlines that this is not prescriptive, this is not a requirement and that there will be additional guidelines. So they are on the same page,” he said.

See also  Updates from all over the world

But McEnany also stated that the President – who first denied the virus would be a problem, then mismanaged, then pushed the country to open up in a way that caused a spike in infection and which now wants to ignore it again – made a final decision on how the pandemic response came out.

“It is up to him to determine what to do with that information, to take what we hear from Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx and others, take what he values ​​in their opinion and arrive at the final best consensus for this country,” he says.

When asked specifically about Fauci, McEnany said Trump remained confident “at the conclusion of our medical experts,” even though veteran officials rarely appeared on the President’s side again and had made varnished statements about the situation which denied Trump’s false portrayal of the virus. on a retreat.

“What we are seeing is exponential growth. From an average of around 20,000 to 40,000 and 50,000. That’s multiplying,” Fauci said on Wednesday in “The Journal,” a podcast produced for the Wall Street Journal. His comments followed the President’s statement Tuesday that the US was “in a good place” right before coronavirus cases in the US reached 3 million.

Fauci also said countries with serious problems had to “seriously look at closure” and that while the 39 million test numbers praised earlier by Pence looked impressive, the real question was whether strong testing and tracing operations existed.

Trump points out his misunderstanding or ignorance of the difficulties many Americans face when he complains that in Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and many other countries “SCHOOLS OPEN WITHOUT PROBLEMS.”

His Tweet ignores the fact that these countries have pressed their coronavirus curves by various methods, while the US is on the Covid-19 trajectory which is rising sharply.

That is another reminder that Trump’s goal is to secure a return to normal life as soon as possible, in schools, in the economy and even in sports, but he is prepared to do little to create an environment where such goals can be safely achieved.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top News

Prize for the Portuguese. Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week

Published

on

Prize for the Portuguese.  Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week

BUTndre Silva won the competition and became the best player of the week in the Champions League, informed UEFAthis Thursday.

The former Porto striker scored in Jota’s 3-1 victory over Celtic Leipzig, scoring a brace in a match that was signed after his Portuguese compatriot equalized.

In addition, Andre Silva also provided the assist for Nkunku, scoring the first goal of this Wednesday’s game in which huge show of foreign fans.

In addition to the Leipzig striker, Di Maria (Juventus), Bellingham (Borussia Dortmund) and Di Lorenzo (Napoli) also fought in the fight for the prize, but it was the Portuguese who managed to smile after voting for the third round of the competition, the famous This Thursday is the fair.

Read also: Diogo Costa and Andre Silva named to Champions League Team of the Week

See also: Andre Silva among the nominees for the title of the best player of the week in the Champions League

See also: double dose. Andre Silva returned to celebrate and sentenced doubts

See also: Andre Silva took advantage of Hart’s colossal mistake and responded to Jota’s goal

Always be the first to know.
6th year in a row Consumers Choice and Five Star Award for Online Press.
Download our free app.

Apple Store Download

See also  Jimmy Lai's newspaper Apple Day-to-day prints fifty percent a million copies in defiance of founder's arrest in Hong Kong
Continue Reading

Top News

Eternal Portuguese deja vu – Renaissance

Published

on

Eternal Portuguese deja vu - Renaissance

At the end of the summer of 1972, exactly half a century ago, SEDES – Associação para o Desenvolvimento Económico e Social (the most famous reformist think tank during Marseilles) issued a document for the country entitled “Portugal: The country we are, the country we want to be “. The Marseille spring had already turned into autumn: Américo Thomas had just been re-elected, the colonial war had dragged on, repression had intensified, and an economic crisis was already brewing. Seeing the general frustration, and at the same time willing to go against it, the signatories of CEDES began by asking “Where will we be and how will we be in 1980?” to criticize the obstacles that overshadowed Portugal in the early 1970s.

Among the “problems that are getting worse without a solution”, emigration stood out, indicating the country’s inability to offer better living and working conditions to those who left; the growing inflationary process, reflected in the cost of living; the inevitability of economic integration in Europe when the country is not ready for international commercial competition; “disaggregation of regional economies” with “continuous depopulation of municipalities and regions” within the country; or “deterioration of public administration” when the government fails to promote a “prestigious, moralized, revitalized and efficient public sector”. “No one will have any difficulty,” continued the text, “to add to a new list of urgent questions that seriously endanger national life, about which much has been said and which, year after year, continue to wait for a sufficient solution.” Therefore, “the prevailing feeling in the country” in contemplation of the recent past and present could not but be “annoyance at urgent battles, the need for which was endlessly discussed, at decisions that were changed or postponed, and at rejected goals” or which were not clearly formulated ” .

See also  An Overview of Satellite Technology by Sahm Adrangi of Kerrisdale Capital

Between “untapped resources” and/or “lack of organizational and decision-making capacity” there was “widespread anxiety” stemming from the inevitable observation that “we are very far from the results that we could achieve thanks to the progress of the Portuguese and Portugal”. This was the macro goal of the reformist, humanist and liberalizing technocrats that SEDES brought together. “Ultimately,” they reminded Marcelo Cayetano, “the real obstacle can only be associated with the low political priority of economic and social development in our country.” So, in short, there was an urgent need to “radically change our economic, social and political way of life”, since “a national balance based on general anemia, repression and weakening of various participants” is unsustainable and pernicious.

SEDES did not know that the Estado Novo would fall in April 1974, that democracy would come in 1976, and Europe from the EEC (after EFTA) in 1986 of repression, finally gained the freedom that was discussed between the lines of the 1972 manifesto ., there would be conditions for solving (almost) all economic and social problems of development and cohesion.

Fifty years have passed since this manifesto, and almost the same number has already been in democracy. However, if we compare the above quotes with the Portuguese present, the feeling of deja vu is indescribable. SEDES wondered what the country would be like in 1980 and is wondering today (in its recent study “Ambition: Doubling GDP in 20 Years”) where we will be in 2040. It may be a replay of a sad fate: knowing (some) where to go, but never getting there!

See also  De Blasio defended the police amid calls to cut the NYPD budget

Continue Reading

Top News

Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy – Observer

Published

on

Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy - Observer

Foreign Minister João Gomes Cravinho met this Wednesday with his Algerian counterpart Ramtan Lamamra, who expressed interest in Portuguese companies investing in Algeria’s solar and wind energy.

Speaking with Lusa, João Cravinho also said that for 2023 it was decided to hold a “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the state visit of the President of Algeria. Algeria to Portugal.

The Portuguese foreign minister said today’s visit to Algeria, where he was with Ramtan Lamamra, whom he has known since 2005 when he was ambassador to Lisbon, is “based on old knowledge”, but also a visit to a country that “does not to be a neighbor”, shares “a lot of fears”. “Not being a neighboring country, it almost shares many concerns about the region, the Mediterranean, the European Union’s relationship with Africa and the Arab world. It was important for us to talk about what we can do together as part of the geopolitical and geo-economic transformation,” he explained.

João Cravinho stressed that the issue of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a factor “which could not but be the subject of dialogue”, and also added that “geo-economic issues related to energy, renewable energy sources and the opportunities that come with the digital transition” also were on the table.

THE PUB • CONTINUE TO READ BELOW

“While Algeria is a major exporter of fossil fuels, it is also a country with huge potential in terms of solar and wind energy. We have very qualified companies in these areas, and the Algerian side has expressed interest in [ter] Portuguese investors in these areas,” the minister said.

See also  Updates from all over the world

The official said that it would be a matter of working with the Portuguese Agency for Investment and Foreign Trade (AICEP), with the Secretary of State for Internationalization, as well as with a sectoral ministry, namely the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. A “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries is scheduled for 2023, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the Algerian President’s state visit to Portugal.

“We have a very busy calendar between the two countries. Now we will try to organize a mixed commission, where technical specialists from both countries will gather,” he said, stressing that there are “14 legal documents that are practically finalized and will be signed” in 2023.

João Gomes Cravinho was on a visit to Algiers today to assess bilateral relations in the economic sphere, as well as in terms of cooperation, language and culture, and to discuss international issues.

Continue Reading

Trending