Connect with us

Top News

Trump called the Black Lives Matter a “symbol of hatred” when he started racing



Trump called the Black Lives Matter a "symbol of hatred" when he started racing

Navigating a dangerous political moment, Trump continues to utilize the broader cultural divisions in ways that he believes will appeal to voters who care about security and order – even though opinion polls show broad disagreement about how he handles race relations.

As he shares suspected fugitive posters on his Twitter and warns those who splash red paint on the statue of George Washington to surrender, Trump also triggers racial tensions using language and figures of speech relating to periods of political segregation and fear of a devastated environment.

The effort was carried out mostly on Trump’s Twitter page, which over the weekend featured supporting videos in Florida chanting “White Power.” Trump later deleted it, even though he left a video of two white house owners in St. Louis protected their stone house with firearms when the Black Lives Matter parade passed by.
Even outside Twitter, aides say Trump has been most focused in meeting on issues surrounding statues and monuments – and not on the coronavirus pandemic or raging intelligence that suggests Russia pays the Taliban to kill American troops. He has instructed administration officials to also focus on this issue and on Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security announced it would form a task force to “protect American monuments, memorials and statues.”

Some President’s political advisers worry Trump is equally distracted from the actual health and economic crisis facing the country and alienates moderate swing voters whose views on race have evolved by viewing Confederate monuments as “history.”

But Trump insists the problem is a win for him and has refused to change direction.

“This is a battle to save our country’s Heritage, History and Greatness!” he wrote on Tuesday, using his campaign hashtag # MAGA2020.

Polls show voters now largely disagree with Trump’s handling of races, including the vast majority of women. Sixty-four percent of women said in a New York Times / Siena poll last week they disagreed about how Trump handled race relations.

Despite these figures, Trump has not yet shown a desire to change direction. This week he has sided with the public with those who want to defend the monument to America’s racist past – including on Tuesday threatened to veto a defense authorization package if it includes provisions to change the names of several military bases in honor of Confederate leaders.

“I will veto the Defense Authorization Bill if Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren (of all people!) Amendments, which will lead to a change of name (plus other bad things!) From Fort Bragg, Fort Robert E. Lee, and many other Military The base from which we won the Two World Wars is in the bill! “Trump writes.

See also  Corrections officers said they were banned from the Derek Chauvin floor because of their skin color

Trump also condemned the decision to remove the names of Woodrow Wilson and John Wayne from buildings and has launched an all-out effort to punish those who destroy national monuments.

Black Lives Matter

On Wednesday, the President was angry at a plan announced recently by officials in New York City to paint the phrase “Black Lives Matter” in front of Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue. This will be the second time the words appear in large letters outside one of Trump’s houses; The mayor of Washington asked for the term to be painted in large yellow letters on a street near the White House last month.

Work on the plan will begin in the coming days, Mayor Bill de Blasio said on Wednesday. A day earlier, the New York City Council approved a budget that included a $ 1 billion cut for the city police department.

“NYC deducts $ Police by ONE BILLION DOLLARS, but @NYCMayor will paint the Big Black Life sign that is yellow on Fifth Avenue, patronizing this fancy Avenue,” Trump wrote on Twitter shortly after de Blasio announced the time of his plan. “This will be even more hostile to the New York Finest.”

The president, who had rejected calls to condemn white nationalists, later called the words “Black Lives Matter” a “symbol of hatred” and suggested that police officers could block the work: “Maybe our HOT Police, who have been neutralized and insulted by a mayor. who hate and disrespect them, will not let this symbol of hatred be plastered on New York’s biggest streets. Spend this money fighting crime! “

See also  Understand the new rules being discussed by the country that could benefit Brazilians.

Target fair housing law, citing impacts on the suburbs

The message came after a midnight tweet on Tuesday showing Obama-era fair housing law intended to combat segregation had a “devastating effect” on the outskirts of the city. Trump is trying to strengthen his position with voters in the suburbs, which was the key to his victory in 2016 but which according to opinion polls now shows he is losing badly – in part because of his divisive views on race.

Poll NPR / PBS / Marist this week found Biden with a 60% -35% advantage over Trump on the fringe – compared to Trump’s 49% -45% win there in 2016, according to poll results.

In the message, Trump wrote that he was reviewing the Fair Housing mandate, which came into force in 2015 as a way to support the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which prohibits restrictions on selling or renting homes to people based on race – and where Trump and his father was accused in a case of violation of federal civil rights in 1973.

“At the request of many great Americans who live in Suburbs, and others, I am studying AFFH housing regulations which have a devastating effect on the rapidly developing Suburban area,” Trump wrote. He said his election year rival Joe Biden wanted to make the suburbs “MUCH BAD.”

“It’s not fair for homeowners,” Trump wrote, “I can END!”

But it’s not clear how Trump’s message – which in terms of time and content is used in conversations around race and equality – can help.

Impact of the Fair Housing Act

Although the Fair Housing Act has been in force for decades, many neighborhoods remain separate, with minority communities tending to have access to good schools, health care and public programs needed to help citizens escape poverty. AFFH is considered important to further enhance the playing field for underprivileged populations.

See also  Joao Almeida's defense counters Landismo's size as the Portuguese retains 3rd place in the Giro

In the official definition of the regulation, the Department of Housing and Urban Development said AFFH was designed “to take meaningful action to overcome historical patterns of segregation, promote fair housing choices, and foster inclusive communities free from discrimination.”

The regulation requires citizens who receive federal funds to submit to the assessment and analysis of fair housing practices, which proponents say are needed to hold them accountable for the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act.

Trump himself was accused of violating the Fair Housing Act when he ran his family’s real estate company in the 1970s. At that time, the Department of Justice alleged that blacks who asked about apartments in the Trump building were rejected but white tenants were offered a lease.

This case was finally resolved after Trump tried to sue.

The Trump administration has said in 2018 that it is delaying the implementation of the AFFH rules, part of a larger effort to dismantle the legacy left by President Barack Obama. At that time, the HUD took the decision as part of a broader effort to reexamine the rules left over from the previous administration.

Earlier this year, HUD Secretary Ben Carson proposed changes that would essentially eliminate AFFH, saying that the mayor and local officials knew their community better than the federal government and were better positioned to make housing decisions. That was welcomed with strong opposition from housing advocates, who said the removal of the rules would make housing unfair.

“This attack on fair housing is part of the ongoing efforts of the greater Trump government to dismantle the protection of civil rights, and it must be stopped,” Lisa Rice, president and CEO of the National Fair Housing Alliance, said in March.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top News

Prize for the Portuguese. Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week



Prize for the Portuguese.  Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week

BUTndre Silva won the competition and became the best player of the week in the Champions League, informed UEFAthis Thursday.

The former Porto striker scored in Jota’s 3-1 victory over Celtic Leipzig, scoring a brace in a match that was signed after his Portuguese compatriot equalized.

In addition, Andre Silva also provided the assist for Nkunku, scoring the first goal of this Wednesday’s game in which huge show of foreign fans.

In addition to the Leipzig striker, Di Maria (Juventus), Bellingham (Borussia Dortmund) and Di Lorenzo (Napoli) also fought in the fight for the prize, but it was the Portuguese who managed to smile after voting for the third round of the competition, the famous This Thursday is the fair.

Read also: Diogo Costa and Andre Silva named to Champions League Team of the Week

See also: Andre Silva among the nominees for the title of the best player of the week in the Champions League

See also: double dose. Andre Silva returned to celebrate and sentenced doubts

See also: Andre Silva took advantage of Hart’s colossal mistake and responded to Jota’s goal

Always be the first to know.
6th year in a row Consumers Choice and Five Star Award for Online Press.
Download our free app.

Apple Store Download

See also  Hot Property: Former Oakland home to list Billie Joe Armstrong Green Day for sale
Continue Reading

Top News

Eternal Portuguese deja vu – Renaissance



Eternal Portuguese deja vu - Renaissance

At the end of the summer of 1972, exactly half a century ago, SEDES – Associação para o Desenvolvimento Económico e Social (the most famous reformist think tank during Marseilles) issued a document for the country entitled “Portugal: The country we are, the country we want to be “. The Marseille spring had already turned into autumn: Américo Thomas had just been re-elected, the colonial war had dragged on, repression had intensified, and an economic crisis was already brewing. Seeing the general frustration, and at the same time willing to go against it, the signatories of CEDES began by asking “Where will we be and how will we be in 1980?” to criticize the obstacles that overshadowed Portugal in the early 1970s.

Among the “problems that are getting worse without a solution”, emigration stood out, indicating the country’s inability to offer better living and working conditions to those who left; the growing inflationary process, reflected in the cost of living; the inevitability of economic integration in Europe when the country is not ready for international commercial competition; “disaggregation of regional economies” with “continuous depopulation of municipalities and regions” within the country; or “deterioration of public administration” when the government fails to promote a “prestigious, moralized, revitalized and efficient public sector”. “No one will have any difficulty,” continued the text, “to add to a new list of urgent questions that seriously endanger national life, about which much has been said and which, year after year, continue to wait for a sufficient solution.” Therefore, “the prevailing feeling in the country” in contemplation of the recent past and present could not but be “annoyance at urgent battles, the need for which was endlessly discussed, at decisions that were changed or postponed, and at rejected goals” or which were not clearly formulated ” .

See also  Portuguese woman freed by kidnappers in Mozambique - Observer

Between “untapped resources” and/or “lack of organizational and decision-making capacity” there was “widespread anxiety” stemming from the inevitable observation that “we are very far from the results that we could achieve thanks to the progress of the Portuguese and Portugal”. This was the macro goal of the reformist, humanist and liberalizing technocrats that SEDES brought together. “Ultimately,” they reminded Marcelo Cayetano, “the real obstacle can only be associated with the low political priority of economic and social development in our country.” So, in short, there was an urgent need to “radically change our economic, social and political way of life”, since “a national balance based on general anemia, repression and weakening of various participants” is unsustainable and pernicious.

SEDES did not know that the Estado Novo would fall in April 1974, that democracy would come in 1976, and Europe from the EEC (after EFTA) in 1986 of repression, finally gained the freedom that was discussed between the lines of the 1972 manifesto ., there would be conditions for solving (almost) all economic and social problems of development and cohesion.

Fifty years have passed since this manifesto, and almost the same number has already been in democracy. However, if we compare the above quotes with the Portuguese present, the feeling of deja vu is indescribable. SEDES wondered what the country would be like in 1980 and is wondering today (in its recent study “Ambition: Doubling GDP in 20 Years”) where we will be in 2040. It may be a replay of a sad fate: knowing (some) where to go, but never getting there!

See also  Georgia college student suspended just after putting up a photo of a crowded faculty hallway claims it was 'good and necessary trouble'

Continue Reading

Top News

Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy – Observer



Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy - Observer

Foreign Minister João Gomes Cravinho met this Wednesday with his Algerian counterpart Ramtan Lamamra, who expressed interest in Portuguese companies investing in Algeria’s solar and wind energy.

Speaking with Lusa, João Cravinho also said that for 2023 it was decided to hold a “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the state visit of the President of Algeria. Algeria to Portugal.

The Portuguese foreign minister said today’s visit to Algeria, where he was with Ramtan Lamamra, whom he has known since 2005 when he was ambassador to Lisbon, is “based on old knowledge”, but also a visit to a country that “does not to be a neighbor”, shares “a lot of fears”. “Not being a neighboring country, it almost shares many concerns about the region, the Mediterranean, the European Union’s relationship with Africa and the Arab world. It was important for us to talk about what we can do together as part of the geopolitical and geo-economic transformation,” he explained.

João Cravinho stressed that the issue of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a factor “which could not but be the subject of dialogue”, and also added that “geo-economic issues related to energy, renewable energy sources and the opportunities that come with the digital transition” also were on the table.


“While Algeria is a major exporter of fossil fuels, it is also a country with huge potential in terms of solar and wind energy. We have very qualified companies in these areas, and the Algerian side has expressed interest in [ter] Portuguese investors in these areas,” the minister said.

See also  Understand the new rules being discussed by the country that could benefit Brazilians.

The official said that it would be a matter of working with the Portuguese Agency for Investment and Foreign Trade (AICEP), with the Secretary of State for Internationalization, as well as with a sectoral ministry, namely the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. A “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries is scheduled for 2023, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the Algerian President’s state visit to Portugal.

“We have a very busy calendar between the two countries. Now we will try to organize a mixed commission, where technical specialists from both countries will gather,” he said, stressing that there are “14 legal documents that are practically finalized and will be signed” in 2023.

João Gomes Cravinho was on a visit to Algiers today to assess bilateral relations in the economic sphere, as well as in terms of cooperation, language and culture, and to discuss international issues.

Continue Reading