Connect with us

Top News

The Supreme Court’s decision on Trump’s tax record is more urgent than ever (opinion)



The Supreme Court's decision on Trump's tax record is more urgent than ever (opinion)
The White House stressed that President Donald Trump was never briefed on intelligence reports – asking questions why, if true, that could be a problem. However, on Tuesday night, it was New York Times reports that President Trump, indeed, was briefed on the Russian gift in February – three months before he unilaterally offered to invite Russia to the G7 meeting.
At the very least, it is in line with Trump’s long pattern and his team avoids confrontation with Vladimir Putin, despite many provocations.
It also provides the latest example, the most urgent, why so many rise to the Supreme Court’s decision on whether Trump’s tax and business records can be submitted to members of the House of Representatives and New York district attorneys. The verdict is expected this week.

This is perhaps the Supreme Court’s most closely monitored decision of this session, with massive implications for the separation of powers and the ability of American voters to make decisions that are fully informed in the November presidential election.

Trump, of course, has violated with decades of precedent in refusing to waive his tax, often making false reasons why he could not do it (among them, that he was subject to what would be the longest tax audit in historical records). The truth is that he has done everything possible to avoid showing his finances to the Americans, with the Department of Justice General Bill Barr now acting like the President’s personal lawyer.
As CNN legal analyst Elie Honig stated, “In total, six different federal courts – three district courts and three appellate court courts – have heard of these cases, and all six have decided against Trump.” In addition, court cases stemming from corruption in the Warren G. Harding administration – known as the Teapot Dome scandal – are likely to immediately applied. Next Law 1924 stated that the Minister of Finance “must provide” tax information as requested by the relevant congressional committee, which was rejected by Trump’s Secretary of Finance Steve Mnuchin, citing “legitimate legislative objectives”.

But there is clear public and legislative interest to find out whether Trump has hidden business dealings with Russia, which might explain his bizarre but persistent reluctance to confront Vladimir Putin on clear matters of US national interests.

Before Trump’s political career, his son Eric repeatedly boasted about being able to cut American Bank – many refuse to do business with the Trump organization – because the company can get all the money needed from Russia. In 2008, his son, Don Jr., told real estate conference “Russia is a disproportionate cross section of many of our assets … we see a lot of money flowing from Russia.” And Reuters reports that 63 Russians are investing almost $ 100 million in the Trump building.
Russia has a famous reputation money laundering and two frequently visited destinations are luxury real estate and casinos – both of which are where the Trump organization has operated in the past.
The bet on Trump's tax return case cannot be higher
This is far from an academic problem. CNN has counted no less than 25 times President Trump has been lenient with Russia – from denying Moscow to meddling in US elections for his benefit, to suggesting it could protect Ukraine’s conquered Crimea province, to undermine Obama-era sanctions, to withdraw US forces from Syria , praising pro-Russian leaders in Europe, for opposing NATO.
In addition, we have seen patterns of administrative officials told not to bring Russia and allegations of electoral interference to the President. Former head of the Department of Homeland Security Kirstjen Neilsen was told not to raise current concerns about the 2020 elections which interfered with Russia’s affairs with the President because he would react badly. That former chief of staff Mick Mulvaney told another senior administration official that it was “not a good subject and must be kept below its level.”
In accordance with the original, when news of Russian gifts erupted, the White House ignored the substance and refused to talk about retaliation against Russia. Instead, as CNN Marshall Cohen points out in a fact-checking analysis of the comments of the White House press secretary: “During his press conference, (Kayleigh) McEnany spent more time criticizing American journalists than condemning Russia for his aggressive actions against US interests, which included the gift of in Afghanistan, interference in elections in 2016, and military action in Syria and Ukraine. ”

“It smells like the WH is trying to mislead the public,” added CNN national security analyst Susan Hennessey about the government’s back pressure. “It is common for different intelligence agents to attach different levels of trust based on the way that underlies intelligence; it is not the same as disagreement about whether something happens.”

Court Observer warning that there is no guarantee that President Trump’s business or tax records will be seen by the public in the near future even if he loses both cases in a court decision. New York District attorney Cy Vance, for example, has issued a subpoena for Trump tax in the context of the Grand Jury investigation and that information will be held tight by the court. But accountability will lead to more transparency than we have ever had in the past on pressing issues that continue to confuse even some of Trump’s allies: why does Trump continue to praise Putin despite constant provocation?

The American people deserve to know the truth about Trump and Russia. And to find out the truth, we must follow the money. The Supreme Court can immediately decide whether truth – or partisan politics – will prevail before the American people go to the polls this November.

See also  Nick Gates vowing to bring 'blue-collar' toughness to Giants

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top News

The abolition of fees for teaching Portuguese abroad will not be accepted by parliament, MP says – Observer



The abolition of fees for teaching Portuguese abroad will not be accepted by parliament, MP says - Observer

According to Socialist MP Paulo Pisco, the views of the BE, PCP and PAN on the abolition of fees for teaching Portuguese abroad were voted on Tuesday in a parliamentary committee.

The Committee on Foreign Affairs and Portuguese Communities voted on Tuesday in favor of four projects – from the Left Bloc, the Communist Party of Portugal, “People-Animal-Nature” and “Enough”, which mainly advocate the abolition of fees for teaching Portuguese abroad and free school textbooks.

According to Paulo Pisco, a socialist member of the commission, the opinions of the BE, PKP and PAN were approved, but Chega’s opinion deserved to be abstained from the PS because it contained “xenophobic elements” in its purpose.

The MP had in mind, in particular, the recipients of this teaching, which is currently intended not only for the Portuguese or the descendants of the Portuguese, but also for those who want to learn the Portuguese language, with which Chega allegedly disagrees, according to Paulo Pisco. .


After the approval of these opinions, the abolition of the bribe would be discussed and voted on in the plenary session of the Assembly of the Republic, but Paulo Pisco said that they should not be approved, since the “commitment” of the government is different.

“The government’s obligation is to reduce the burden of the Portuguese” and this will always be determined “in every approved state budget”.

Continue Reading

Top News

Portuguese health minister rejects conflict of interest over marriage to president



The health minister said there was no conflict of interest in her marriage to the current chairman of the Order of Dietitians, saying that the trusteeship of that body had been delegated to the Secretary of State for Health Promotion.

Portugal Digital with Lusa

“Honestly, I don’t think it exists. I have no doubt that this Lady Secretary of State will fill this leadership role,” Manuel Pizarro said on Monday (age 26) on the sidelines of the Pharmacist’s Day celebrations in Sintra, in the Lisbon area.

Aware of the possible conflict of interest, Manuel Pizarro explained that he took “the most appropriate measure (…)”, which was to entrust the functions of guardianship of the Order of Nutritionists to Margarida Tavares.”

“(…) Since I took office as a minister, I have been aware that, since professional organizations have an administrative oversight role, (…) there is a risk of conflict of interest, and I have taken the measures that seem to me the most appropriate, which from the very decided at the outset that he would delegate this oversight function over the Order of Nutritionists to the Secretary of State for Health Promotion,” he stressed.

When asked about the reasons why Margarida Tavares’ name still does not appear in the Diário da República, the official said that “it was necessary to wait for the inauguration of the secretaries of state” and then “to organize the whole process of delegation of authority.” .

“It’s even a good chance that there is a Secretary of State for Health Promotion. I think custody of the Order of Dietitians has been well handed over to the Secretary of State for Health Promotion,” he repeated, noting that “he definitely won’t go through the Minister’s order.” [da Saúde]”.

See also  Kabuki arrives in Lisbon and gives Japanese cuisine a Portuguese flavor.

“If the secretary of state is responsible for this, it should not go through the minister,” he stressed.

Manuel Pizarro’s statements came after news that the government official may have a conflict of interest because he is married to the chairman of the Order of Dietitians, Alexandra Bento.

The Order of Dietitians was created in 2011 with the approval of the current Minister of Health, who at the time served as Secretary of State for Health.

In addition, Alexandra Bento was the only President of the Order of Occupational Health to attend the inauguration of Manuel Pizarro on 10 September.

Continue Reading

Top News

Portuguese newspaper criticizes CR7: “Less Ronaldo, more Portugal” | international football



Portuguese newspaper criticizes CR7: "Less Ronaldo, more Portugal" |  international football

The cover of one of the most important sports newspapers in Portugal this Monday drew a critical tone against the greatest player in the history of the country.

+ See League of Nations table

On the eve of the day when the Portuguese national team will play with Spain and draw for reaching the semi-finals of the League of Nations, the daily newspaper “A Bola” printed a photo Cristiano Ronaldo stating that the player had lost influence in the team commanded by Fernando Santos.

“Less Ronaldo, more Portugal,” reads the headline.

The publication reports that the 37-year-old striker could start on the bench and lists some of the positives of his possible absence, such as the buffing of protagonist Bruno Fernandes. See below:

This Tuesday’s cover of A Bola is being printed by Cristiano Ronaldo – Photo: Reproduction

+ After shock and bleeding, Cristiano Ronaldo trains with a black eye in Portugal

Cristiano Ronaldo started and assisted in a 4–0 thrashing of the Czech Republic on the last round. He has only scored twice in his last eight caps, both against Switzerland.

Czech Republic 0 x 4 Portugal highlights in UEFA Nations League 2022

For Manchester United in the 2022/23 season, he started in three of the eight games played. In the last of them, against Sheriff from Moldova, in the Europa League, he scored for the first time.

Continue Reading