Connect with us

Top News

The Trump administration is suing Bolton for a book dispute



National Security Advisor John Bolton (R) listens to U.S. President Donald Trump talk to reporters during a meeting of his cabinet in the Cabinet Room at the White House February 12, 2019 in Washington, DC.

The lawsuit, filed in Washington, DC, a federal court, alleges that the 500-page manuscript plus Bolton is “full of confidential information,” and prosecutors say that Bolton has resigned from the ongoing White House inspection process for the book he had made. obliged to do as a result of the agreement.

“(Bolton) bargained with the United States as a condition of his employment in one of the most sensitive and important national security positions in the United States Government and now wants to renege on the offer by unilaterally deciding that the pre-publication review process is complete and decided on its own “whether confidential information should be published,” wrote the prosecutor.

The lawsuit marked the latest White House effort on Bolton after months of back and forth between the National Security Council and Bolton representatives as to whether the book contained classified information. Simon & Schuster previously announced that Bolton’s book, “In the Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir,” will be released on June 23.

Bolton’s books were sent to the warehouse before the scheduled release. He has recorded an interview with ABC which is scheduled to air on Sunday. And a source close to him said he intended to publish the book as scheduled on Tuesday, which meant he expected to deal with the consequences of the administration afterwards, not before.

CNN has contacted Bolton’s lawyer for comment. In a letter sent to NSC’s legal counsel last week, Chuck Cooper, Bolton’s lawyer, accused the White House of trying to block the book for “purely political reasons,” adding that “as a practical matter, it was (late) arriving.”

See also  Updates from all over the world

The tiring back and forth between Bolton, his lawyers and the White House regarding the pre-publication review process was detailed in the lawsuit. Bolton, who left the White House in September, submitted his original draft late last year to the White House for an inspection process, and was told shortly thereafter by a senior NSC official that it contained large amounts of confidential information, including material designated as top secret.

After several face-to-face meetings and editing rounds culminating in late April, Bolton appears to have completed a pre-publication review. Ellen Knight, the official who reviewed the book, has determined that the latest version of the manuscript no longer contains confidential information, the lawsuit said.

But less than a week later, another round of reviews began at the White House, this time by Michael Ellis, NSC’s senior director of intelligence. The review came at the request of Robert O’Brien, Bolton’s successor as national security adviser, according to the lawsuit.

O’Brien “is concerned that the manuscript appears to still contain confidential information, partly because the same administration that it serves is still in the office and the manuscript illustrates sensitive information about the ongoing foreign policy issues,” the lawsuit said.

Ellis completed his review on June 9 and found that there were still some examples of confidential information in the book – because news reports illustrated Bolton’s intention to move forward with the publication of the book on June 23, even without the White House’s approval.

In a letter sent to Bolton’s lawyer on Thursday, the NSC’s legal advisor wrote that “the text still contains confidential information, because, among other things, it includes information that he himself classifies and sets out for declassification only after a lapse of twenty five years . “

See also  Cristiano Ronaldo with Saudi Arabian Millionaire Proposal

Trump is increasingly irritated by the notion that his former national security adviser will publish public books, sources said. He told the staff that he wanted to stop publication and reflect personally about demanding that he stop it, a tactic that the previous president relied on when former officials or people close to him had written books that he thought would be unprofitable. He has a history of filing lawsuits which he then sent down.

On Monday, Trump incorrectly stated that conversations with him were classified and signaled the possibility of legal action.

“They are in court or they will be in court soon,” Trump said. “But he understands he is not completing the process or approaching the process.”

Trump said Bolton would have “criminal problems” if the book was published as is. The lawsuit filed Tuesday was a civil suit, and did not carry criminal penalties. Initially, Attorney General William Barr did not confirm that his party was preparing a lawsuit but said the government was focused on asking Bolton to complete the cleaning process to publish the book.

“People who come to work in government and have access to sensitive information generally sign an agreement that says when they leave the government, if they write something that refers to or might reflect some of the information they have access to, they must go through a cleaning process before they can publishing a book, “Barr said on Monday. “We don’t think Bolton has gone through that process, not yet completed that process.”

In addition to the delayed publication, the government asked the court to order Bolton publishers to “take and discard” copies of any books that were distributed. They also ask for whatever money the book gets from its sale – or the sale of film rights from it – if it is published without a complete pre-publication review.

See also  Liberty University names acting president immediately after Falwell placed on indefinite depart

This is an extraordinary story and will be updated.

CNN’s Kylie Atwood and Paul LeBlanc contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top News

Prize for the Portuguese. Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week



Prize for the Portuguese.  Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week

BUTndre Silva won the competition and became the best player of the week in the Champions League, informed UEFAthis Thursday.

The former Porto striker scored in Jota’s 3-1 victory over Celtic Leipzig, scoring a brace in a match that was signed after his Portuguese compatriot equalized.

In addition, Andre Silva also provided the assist for Nkunku, scoring the first goal of this Wednesday’s game in which huge show of foreign fans.

In addition to the Leipzig striker, Di Maria (Juventus), Bellingham (Borussia Dortmund) and Di Lorenzo (Napoli) also fought in the fight for the prize, but it was the Portuguese who managed to smile after voting for the third round of the competition, the famous This Thursday is the fair.

Read also: Diogo Costa and Andre Silva named to Champions League Team of the Week

See also: Andre Silva among the nominees for the title of the best player of the week in the Champions League

See also: double dose. Andre Silva returned to celebrate and sentenced doubts

See also: Andre Silva took advantage of Hart’s colossal mistake and responded to Jota’s goal

Always be the first to know.
6th year in a row Consumers Choice and Five Star Award for Online Press.
Download our free app.

Apple Store Download

See also  The mask's decision will haunt Trump's election offer
Continue Reading

Top News

Eternal Portuguese deja vu – Renaissance



Eternal Portuguese deja vu - Renaissance

At the end of the summer of 1972, exactly half a century ago, SEDES – Associação para o Desenvolvimento Económico e Social (the most famous reformist think tank during Marseilles) issued a document for the country entitled “Portugal: The country we are, the country we want to be “. The Marseille spring had already turned into autumn: Américo Thomas had just been re-elected, the colonial war had dragged on, repression had intensified, and an economic crisis was already brewing. Seeing the general frustration, and at the same time willing to go against it, the signatories of CEDES began by asking “Where will we be and how will we be in 1980?” to criticize the obstacles that overshadowed Portugal in the early 1970s.

Among the “problems that are getting worse without a solution”, emigration stood out, indicating the country’s inability to offer better living and working conditions to those who left; the growing inflationary process, reflected in the cost of living; the inevitability of economic integration in Europe when the country is not ready for international commercial competition; “disaggregation of regional economies” with “continuous depopulation of municipalities and regions” within the country; or “deterioration of public administration” when the government fails to promote a “prestigious, moralized, revitalized and efficient public sector”. “No one will have any difficulty,” continued the text, “to add to a new list of urgent questions that seriously endanger national life, about which much has been said and which, year after year, continue to wait for a sufficient solution.” Therefore, “the prevailing feeling in the country” in contemplation of the recent past and present could not but be “annoyance at urgent battles, the need for which was endlessly discussed, at decisions that were changed or postponed, and at rejected goals” or which were not clearly formulated ” .

See also  Home of the Week: Through the Malibu modernist lens

Between “untapped resources” and/or “lack of organizational and decision-making capacity” there was “widespread anxiety” stemming from the inevitable observation that “we are very far from the results that we could achieve thanks to the progress of the Portuguese and Portugal”. This was the macro goal of the reformist, humanist and liberalizing technocrats that SEDES brought together. “Ultimately,” they reminded Marcelo Cayetano, “the real obstacle can only be associated with the low political priority of economic and social development in our country.” So, in short, there was an urgent need to “radically change our economic, social and political way of life”, since “a national balance based on general anemia, repression and weakening of various participants” is unsustainable and pernicious.

SEDES did not know that the Estado Novo would fall in April 1974, that democracy would come in 1976, and Europe from the EEC (after EFTA) in 1986 of repression, finally gained the freedom that was discussed between the lines of the 1972 manifesto ., there would be conditions for solving (almost) all economic and social problems of development and cohesion.

Fifty years have passed since this manifesto, and almost the same number has already been in democracy. However, if we compare the above quotes with the Portuguese present, the feeling of deja vu is indescribable. SEDES wondered what the country would be like in 1980 and is wondering today (in its recent study “Ambition: Doubling GDP in 20 Years”) where we will be in 2040. It may be a replay of a sad fate: knowing (some) where to go, but never getting there!

See also  Pompeo fired State Department inspector general Steve Linick

Continue Reading

Top News

Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy – Observer



Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy - Observer

Foreign Minister João Gomes Cravinho met this Wednesday with his Algerian counterpart Ramtan Lamamra, who expressed interest in Portuguese companies investing in Algeria’s solar and wind energy.

Speaking with Lusa, João Cravinho also said that for 2023 it was decided to hold a “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the state visit of the President of Algeria. Algeria to Portugal.

The Portuguese foreign minister said today’s visit to Algeria, where he was with Ramtan Lamamra, whom he has known since 2005 when he was ambassador to Lisbon, is “based on old knowledge”, but also a visit to a country that “does not to be a neighbor”, shares “a lot of fears”. “Not being a neighboring country, it almost shares many concerns about the region, the Mediterranean, the European Union’s relationship with Africa and the Arab world. It was important for us to talk about what we can do together as part of the geopolitical and geo-economic transformation,” he explained.

João Cravinho stressed that the issue of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a factor “which could not but be the subject of dialogue”, and also added that “geo-economic issues related to energy, renewable energy sources and the opportunities that come with the digital transition” also were on the table.


“While Algeria is a major exporter of fossil fuels, it is also a country with huge potential in terms of solar and wind energy. We have very qualified companies in these areas, and the Algerian side has expressed interest in [ter] Portuguese investors in these areas,” the minister said.

See also  Pompeo fired State Department inspector general Steve Linick

The official said that it would be a matter of working with the Portuguese Agency for Investment and Foreign Trade (AICEP), with the Secretary of State for Internationalization, as well as with a sectoral ministry, namely the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. A “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries is scheduled for 2023, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the Algerian President’s state visit to Portugal.

“We have a very busy calendar between the two countries. Now we will try to organize a mixed commission, where technical specialists from both countries will gather,” he said, stressing that there are “14 legal documents that are practically finalized and will be signed” in 2023.

João Gomes Cravinho was on a visit to Algiers today to assess bilateral relations in the economic sphere, as well as in terms of cooperation, language and culture, and to discuss international issues.

Continue Reading