Connect with us

Top News

Hiltzik: Trump moves to kill Obamacare despite COVID-19

Published

on

Hiltzik: Trump moves to kill Obamacare despite COVID-19

Over the years, there have been many reasons for fear of the reckless and negligent policies emanating from the Trump White House, such as poison. Thursday brought us a reminder of what might be the scariest of all: the government’s determination to overthrow the Affordable Care Act.

We talked about government brief in a case brought by Texas and a number of other red states that tried to make the ACA declared unconstitutional. This brief is based on theories that have been ridiculed by legal experts from one end of the political spectrum to the other.

The impact will be almost indescribable, tearing the health coverage of some 23 million Americans in dental pandemics that have claimed more than 120,000 American lives and condemned others for years, maybe decades, of chronic illness.

This case has nothing to do with law as we conventionally understand it. This is an exercise in raw political power.

Nicholas Bagley, University of Michigan

The Brief “manages to be both foolishly and totally frightening, “Veterans health expert Christen Linke Young of the Brookings Institute jury. So

We have written before about the crackpot legal theory that underlies the plaintiff’s case and his endorsement by Trump. Before reviewing his argument, let us examine the consequences, if the majority of at least five justices buy.

In general, the lawsuit and endorsement of the White House reflects the Republican approach to coverage of health and health services in the U.S., which is basically vandalism. The GOP in Congress treats health services as a privilege, not a right.

The party does not see health as a communal item, but only something that must be given to those who can afford it; everyone else is cursed.

That is why 100% of health care policies since the ACA came into force in 2010 have been devoted to breaking down the law, and 0% for developing effective replacements. The Republican mantra has been “uprooting and replacing,” but they aim for the first but never even try to reach the second.

Although most people think of ACA especially in terms of individual insurance exchanges that provide uninsured and low-income households with subsidized health coverage, and the expansion of Medicaid which has brought coverage at no cost to the lowest income households in the District of Columbia and 33 countries that have accept it, the law is far broader.

See also  Hot Property: The Silver Lake house designed by Eugene Choy sells

Dropping the ACA as unconstitutional would eliminate subsidized coverage for 10 million Americans and Medicaid coverage for more than 17 million.

Non-white Americans will bear the burden of uninsured tariff increases after the full revocation of Obamacare.

(Urban Institute)

Protection for some 133 million Americans whose pre-existing medical conditions will freeze them from the insurance market or punish them with the exception of coverage or large additional premiums – the obstacles they face before the ACA – will disappear.

Likewise, the prohibition of ACA on annual and lifetime limits on health benefits, own expenditure limits, guarantees that each health plan includes 10 “important benefits,” including prescription, hospitalization, maternity and newborn services, and mental health services.

The closing of the famous Medicare recipe “donut hole,” which raises the price of recipes for seniors, will end. Children’s rights to remain with their parents’ insurance until age 26 will be abolished.

ACA has become very important in bringing health care services to America during the COVID-19 pandemic, partly because it has driven demand for testing and treatment, and because the economic crisis caused by the pandemic has forced millions from their employer-based plans and entered into individual markets or Medicaid .

Dropping the ACA will increase the number of uninsured Americans by more than 65%, increasing it to 50.3 million from 30.4 million, Urban Institute project. Ethnic minorities and low-income Americans will be most affected.

More than 10.5 million people will lose their reach in coronavirus hot spots such as Arizona, Texas, Florida, California, Georgia and Carolina, according to estimates by the Center for American Progress.

Obviously, this is a disaster spell. Trump and his accomplices at GOP obviously don’t know how to read.

That brings us to the legal argument, which has been through a federal court since 2018. The plaintiff’s case is based on a tax cut approved by the Republican Congress and signed by Trump in December 2017.

Unable to gather votes to revoke the ACA directly, Republicans voted in a tax cut to reduce ACA penalties for Americans who fail to obtain health coverage to zero from around $ 700 per adult per year, to a maximum of around $ 2,000 per household. That effectively delays the individual’s mandate, because there is no longer a cost to mock him.

See also  What is the purpose of using it?

Texas and other red states argue that this invalidates the entire ACA. Their reason was that the Supreme Court, in a 2012 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, had upheld the ACA by calling the punishment “tax,” which Congress had the right to impose.

Reducing “tax” to zero means that there is no tax, and therefore there is no mandate, and therefore there is no constitutional protection; because the ACA must survive or fall as a whole, the plaintiff insisted, all laws must fall.

This argument appeared before a right-wing federal judge in Texas, Reed O’Connor, who bought it. His verdict that invalidated the law was submitted to the conservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

An appeal panel of three judges complained in a law degree decision Nicholas Bagley from the University of Michigan scoffed as “mixing arrogance and coward in equal measure” – arrogant for ignoring the essence of Roberts’ verdict, coward for sending the case back to O’Connor without deciding for himself whether all laws, or only part of it, should go.

Low-income households

Low-income households will lose insurance at the highest level. “FPL” refers to the federal poverty rate, which is $ 26,200 for a family of four.

(Urban Institute)

Meanwhile the Trump administration throws up with the plaintiffs by refusing to defend the law in court. The defense has been taken by the now-Democratic House of Representatives and a coalition of blue nations led by California.

Instead of giving up something to O’Connor, the Supreme Court accepted the case. It was not expected to rule until after the November elections.

Whether someone expects the court to enforce the law or kill it, or find a middle ground, this is arguably a big problem for Trump and the GOP. That’s because they can be blamed for abandoning health care reforms that are important in limbo because the need for a functioning health system is growing more urgent every time.

The administration is waiting to submit its legal report to the Supreme Court on Thursday night to defeat the submission deadline by minute, so it may not be too proud of its work – with good reason.

See also  Stefanik called for a feeding into Cuomo's nursing home policy inquiry

Legal experts see government briefs as replicating all the weaknesses of the underlying arguments. The government argues that by reducing the penalty for individual mandates to zero, Congress abolished “taxes” because taxes that do not produce non-tax revenue.

But as Bagley noted, that is not true – many taxes do not generate income or have been temporarily deferred, but they still apply. That’s the problem here.

Even though the Supreme Court believes that individual mandates are invalid, there is no reason to state that all ACAs must stand or fall as a whole – that their provisions cannot be overcome, in legal language.

“The interconnected network of ACA provisions cannot function as intended by Congress” without individual mandates, a brief description of the government. That makes no sense.

Many legal provisions are not related to the individual insurance market established by the ACA. Much is related to Medicare or public health policies and practices. Others set standards for health policies outside of individual markets, such as employer plans.

Regarding whether Congress intends to abolish the sentence to cancel all laws, there is no evidence for that. Congress didn’t say that when passing a tax-cutting bill.

A brief explanation from the government regarding this issue. It acknowledged that “Congress does not speak generally about … severity,” when passing tax cuts, but only addresses “specific issues” of punishment.

But it is said that even if overturning the ACA is “not what its members expected in 2017 when they changed the ACA,” it doesn’t matter (“there is a possibility of Members on both sides” of this issue, a brief acknowledgment) – the penalty “is directly relevant with separation “and the court must consider all irrevocable laws.

Bagley observed, “This case has nothing to do with law as we conventionally understand it. This is an exercise in raw political power. “By asking the court to overturn the Affordable Care Act,” the Trump administration is asking the court to give a reason to stop enforcing the entire law altogether. ”

He’s right. This is an expression of Trump’s method of injecting chaos into everything he touches, as if the government’s goal is to make human existence harder, more cruel, and more shocking and frightening than anyone can imagine.

Throwing the health care system into anarchy when millions of Americans face disease and death from pathogens that cannot be penetrated? Much better. Welcome to Trump’s vision of America.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Top News

Study points to need for ‘structural cultural change’ in Portuguese sport – DNOTICIAS.PT

Published

on

Study points to need for 'structural cultural change' in Portuguese sport - DNOTICIAS.PT

The Portuguese sports sector is in need of a “structural cultural change”, according to a study commissioned by PricewaterhouseCoopers commissioned by the Portuguese Olympic Committee (COP), the Portuguese Paralympic Committee (CPP) and the Portuguese Sports Confederation (CDP).

The second part of this report, published today, on the state of the sector in Portugal compared to other European countries and after the covid-19 pandemic, speaks of the desire to “carry out structural cultural changes”, towards a “society that recognizes the social and economic importance of sport and regularly engages in physical and sports activities.

In particular, the problems of the Portuguese sports system are numerous and have several “long-standing structural vulnerabilities”.

A “poor funding structure” with underfunding and heavy reliance on the public sector “by local authorities”, as well as the “short” cost of the central government and gambling, betting operators and other arrangements, exposes the sector to difficulties.

Other weaknesses range from low levels of professionalism to “alarming levels of participation in sports” with historic lows without effective government action, with disinterest “particularly among women, ethnic minorities, people with disabilities and the elderly”, in addition to “levels of concern about physical motor illiteracy among children.

Other cited factors are “weak awareness of innovation in sport” and issues of ethics and integrity, as well as “various scandals involving corruption, match-fixing, organized violence and money laundering”.

“In short, the structural deficiencies of Portuguese sport reflect a general lack of sports culture in society. Portuguese sport has deep structural problems that ultimately affect the public’s perception of sport. the socio-economic impact of sports, while, on the other hand, sports organizations have shown a limited ability to respond to challenges due to their low level of professionalism.

Despite the difficulties, the report notes a “positive evolution” in recent decades “with increased national adoption of sport thanks to factors such as regulatory reforms and investment in infrastructure”, but still far from the European average in most countries. indicators.

See also  A passenger is expelled from the plane for refusing to wear a mask

“Portuguese governments have failed to place sport on the political agenda and enhance its socio-economic impact, which goes far beyond health benefits,” the summary says.

Thus, the alarming situation shown in the report calls for leading “cultural change and engaging the entire society in recognizing the importance of sport at all levels.”

“[Para isso] sports system partners should improve their strategic alignment and take concerted action,” the report notes.

By identifying six priority areas, which are themselves divided into more than a dozen recommendations, a “comprehensive end-to-end catalyst” is required, which includes, among other things, the development of a National Sports Strategy.

This should “connect all its aspects, improving coordination among stakeholders and enhancing its relevance to the political agenda”, promoting a sector that should be “sustainable” and whose decisions are based on evidence.

Increasing the funding channeled to the sector, with the link between “government funding and sporting success”, reducing bureaucracy and efficient resource management are the consultant’s comments in this area.

Professionalizing the sector, sustainability, increasing physical activity, promoting sports in the education system and in the social inclusion system, promoting the digital transition and linking with the scientific and academic sector are other recommendations, also keeping in mind the issues of social responsibility and honesty.

The first part of the study, presented in July 2021, noted the loss of 16,000 jobs, 3,100 clubs and 595 million euros in this sector due to the impact of the covid-19 pandemic, with a decrease in the number of practitioners by 110,000, with only partially compensate for the damage.

The President of the Constitutional Court calls for a change in the state policy on sports

The President of the Portuguese Olympic Committee (COP) asks in an interview with Lusa to change the paradigm of public policy and investment in sports in the country in order to counter the “unfavorable situation” in this sector.

See also  The Cinema Caravan will tour the country to promote Portuguese cinema.

José Manuel Constantino spoke to Lusa about the second part of a study commissioned by COP, the Portuguese Paralympic Committee (CPP) and the Portuguese Sports Confederation (CdP), on the state of the industry in Portugal compared to other European countries and after the covid-19 pandemic.

“[O estudo é] confirmation that there is a huge imbalance in the amount of public investment in sport between what is practiced in Portugal and what is predicted in most of the European countries in which the comparative study was carried out,” he emphasizes.

According to the director, this “more comprehensive and in-depth work” in the second part by PricewaterhouseCoopers “clearly reflects the underfunding from a public point of view that the sports sector in Portugal has.”

“The study gives a picture of the situation and offers a number of suggestions on how we can restore the distance we have with most European countries. This will, of course, depend on public policy. […] This is a challenge to public policy,” he adds.

Moreover, the SC is ready to continue to submit proposals to the country, in particular “those who are responsible for governance”, and to cooperate in the search for a new strategy and path for the development of national sports.

Among the topics that José Manuel Constantino lists for “increasing the degree of competitiveness not only externally but also internally” are expanding the base of practitioners and strengthening the associative fabric, among other things, to “implement reforms in the sports system that can help it grow and develop” .

“When we say that a strategy is needed, we are not talking about a special plan, special plans that we had in the past, and, unfortunately, they are in the drawers of departments. In terms of path. We are fully prepared to continue cooperation,” he notes.

See also  US coronavirus update: Latest on cases, deaths and reopening

From political power, he hopes that she will look at the study presented today and “make an assessment that she understands and can extract some consequences”, because “it is not enough to do more of the same, we need to do more and differently.” “.

“This is what the study points to and suggests. […] This is not about maintaining the line of succession, but about changing it, and if we want a significant leap, as envisaged in the government’s program, then in 10 years to bring Portugal into the 15 most active European countries in terms of sports,” he comments.

The Portuguese sports sector is in need of a “structural cultural change”, according to the second part of the report released today.

The document emphasizes the desire to “carry out structural cultural changes” towards “a society that recognizes the social and economic importance of sport and regularly engages in physical and sporting activities.”

In particular, the problems of the Portuguese sports system are numerous and have several “long-standing structural vulnerabilities”.

A “poor funding structure” with underfunding and heavy reliance on the public sector “by local authorities”, as well as the “short” cost of the central government and gambling, betting operators and other arrangements, exposes the sector to difficulties.

Thus, the alarming situation referred to in the report calls for leading “cultural change and engaging the entire society in recognizing the importance of sport at all levels.”

Increasing funding directed to this sector, with a link between “government funding and sporting success”, reducing bureaucracy and efficient resource management are some of the consultant’s comments in this area.

Continue Reading

Top News

Portuguese newspaper highlights Botafogo’s ‘desire’ for Cristiano Ronaldo after Rafael’s interview

Published

on

Portuguese newspaper highlights Botafogo's 'desire' for Cristiano Ronaldo after Rafael's interview

Botafogo

During an interview with the podcast, the side talked about the possibility of hiring an ace, since after the arrival of Textor, the purchasing power of the team has become higher.

Portuguese newspaper highlights Cristiano Ronaldo's 'desire' Botafogo
© Photo: Bryn Lennon / TeamPortuguese newspaper highlights Cristiano Ronaldo’s ‘desire’ Botafogo

During the podcast interview ‘Sports club “Flow”‘, right back Raphael joked about the possibility Cristiano Ronaldo play for Botafogo next season. This statement caused a resonance in Portugal. sports newspaper of the country, ‘A Bola‘, associated the name CR7 with Glorioso.

The report had the following title “Cristiano Ronaldo wants to… Botafogo‘. However, from the article it becomes clear that this was nothing more than a joke on the part of the alvinegro player. OUR portuguese portalalso emphasizes that the persistence of the player in Manchester United for the next season, something is considered uncertain.

In social networks Raphael amused by the headline in the newspaper and joked aboutpossibility‘, which is clear from the title of the article. “You will become the bench of Erison and Matheus (Nascimento), there is no way”, wrote Raphael o’Twitter‘. The party also talked about donating the number 7 shirt to the player. Cristiano Ronaldo. “Not for him, he’s out of shape.”

Raphael was a clubmate Cristiano Ronaldo the first time the player passes through Manchester United. The contract of the 37-year-old Portuguese with the English club runs until June 2023. This season, he has scored 24 goals in 38 games played, in addition to three assists.

See also  The Cinema Caravan will tour the country to promote Portuguese cinema.
Continue Reading

Top News

Portugal’s Alexandre Santos returns the title to Petro de Luanda

Published

on

Portugal's Alexandre Santos returns the title to Petro de Luanda

Quinito in the 34th minute, Thiago Azulau in the 60th minute and Ito in the 76th minute scored the goals that secured Pétro de Luanda’s 16th title and Alexandre Santos’ first title in Angola. Working Patience at 90+4 reduced the disadvantage.

Petro de Luanda won his last title in 2009 under Portuguese coach Bernardino Pedroto.

New champions Angola scored 68 points ahead of Sagrada Esperanza in second place with 59 points.

Progresso do Sambizanga with 18 points in 14th place, Kabuscorp do Palanca with 14 in 15th place and Sporting de Benguela with nine points in last place can no longer remain in the Angolan First Division. football.

Sagrada Esperanza’s Depu tops Girabola’s top scorers with 19 goals, followed by Thiago Azulao of Petro de Luanda with 17 goals.

Continue Reading

Trending