Connect with us

Top News

Cuomo bowed after the deadly nursing home’s decision: Goodwin



Cuomo bowed after the deadly nursing home's decision: Goodwin

There is an old saying that if you don’t honk yourself, there won’t be any music. Governor Andrew Cuomo is clearly a believer, after ending a series of 111 daily coronavirus briefings with an explosion of praise for himself.

From March 2 to Friday, he appeared in marathon appearances that increased his political rank. At the start he reached an extraordinary 87 percent agreement in the state and an April poll found that 56 percent of national Democrats wanted to dump Joe Biden and make Cuomo a presidential candidate.

This support reflects how proficient the governor’s performance is in front of the camera. He seems to have a fact order and uses large charts to show the flow of cases, hospitalization and death. He repeated the federal mantra of “leveling the curve” to justify his historic closure in New York.

As time went by, Cuomo became a person and used his mother, three daughters, CNN news anchor brother, late father and others as props. Off-topic detours, which included his method for cooking meatballs, grew very indulgent, but still made him loved by viewers dubbed “Cuomosexuals.”

But there’s another old saying that also applies here – looks can be deceiving. In this case, they are of course due to the fact outside the camera is that the management of the Cuomo pandemic response is an extraordinary disaster.

Thousands of elderly New Yorkers may have died because of his mistakes – but he innocently refused to admit a single mistake to a grieving family.

The biggest mistake was the famous Ministry of Health’s order on March 25 which required nursing homes and rehabilitation centers to accept COVID-19 patients who were discharged from hospitals. It stands out as one of the worst decisions in New York history because it condemns the death of the most vulnerable to hell surrounded by strangers while no friends or relatives are allowed to visit.

See also  Postmaster Standard tells suggests to go away mail guiding if it delays routes

The order gave nursing homes no warning, no help and no way to reject infectious patients. To prevent discrimination, it is even said that the home cannot ask if a patient is forced to do a positive test.

Officially, New York said the corona virus claimed 6,200 lives in nursing homes, or about 25 percent of the state’s total of nearly 25,000 deaths, but the actual number was clearly higher. Some estimate that deaths in nursing homes are approaching 12,000.

One reason for this gap is that many of those who died have never been tested. Another is that officials changed the method of counting in the middle of the river. Residents who were sick in homes but died in hospitals were initially calculated as the total nursing home; then, their deaths are counted in the total hospital.

Although the order wreaked havoc behind closed doors, the general public was in the dark until The Post broke the news on April 21, and the governor had attacked The Post ever since. That day, Albany reporter Bernadette Hogan asked about the order at the briefing.

“That’s a good question, I don’t know,” Cuomo said, turning to Dr. Howard Zucker, his health commissioner. Zucker assured the media that “the necessary precautions will be taken to protect other residents” in nursing homes.

It was the first of many lies that Cuomo and his team would use in their efforts to avoid responsibility and blame. Zucker should know and Cuomo should know that no precautions – zero, no – were taken to protect the residents of nursing homes.

Because orders were immediately put in place, without inspections or even conversations with managers, the state did not know which of the 600 long-term care facilities had enough space and staff to separate COVID-19 patients. The state also does not know if the facility has protective equipment for nurses and others who will treat infected patients.

See also  Six major comeback that will go down in the history of New York sports

The next day, my column included a sad example of a disaster that had lasted for almost a month. Long Island educator Arlene Mullin, in a letter marking the March 25 order and pointing to Hogan’s question, went straight to the point.

“I wonder who will hold Governor Cuomo responsible for the deaths of so many parents because of his careless decision,” Mullin wrote. “I write as a princess who lost her 88-year-old beautiful mother who was receiving physical therapy in a facility like that.”

His devastated experience, we know now, is not unique at that time and many others will suffer the same suffering in the following weeks. Their sadness is exacerbated because Cuomo prohibits families from visiting their loved ones since March 12, so that visitors do not bring the virus to a nursing home.

The decision, based on what happened in the states of Washington, Italy, China and South Korea, shows knowledge of the extreme dangers that the virus presents to the elderly. But two weeks later, a Health Department order forcibly inserted the virus into the same houses, where it spread like wildfire.

Despite the deadly consequences of his decision, Cuomo has used an ever-changing excuse of cheap and rude offers to blame anyone but himself. He alternately points fingers at God, Trump administration and the owner of the nursing home.

Even more strange, after he canceled his order on May 10, Cuomo continued to keep it, saying “Whatever we have done has been successful, based on facts.”

If it works, why cancel it?

See also  Can sausages increase the risk of cancer? Portuguese case and expert advice

Part of his defense is repeatedly blaming The Post, especially me and fellow columnist Bob McManus, accusing us of trying to protect President Trump. He said our coverage was only “political,” calling death in a nursing home “a shiny object” and adding Chief Post Rupert Murdoch to his black sheep list.

Unfortunately for Cuomo, the accusation of “false news” was unsuccessful. PolitiFact said its claim that he followed federal guidelines “was largely wrong,” and other media organizations had issued him because of death in nursing homes, including ProPublica. The Associated Press estimates that 4,500 COVID-19 patients were sent to nursing homes.

Even The New York Times briefly stop the hate-Trump coverage to state that New York is at the center of the spread of the virus in part because Cuomo and others “are hampered by their own confusing guidance, heedless warnings, delayed decisions and political dissension.”

Cuomo was also extraordinary – and expensive – wrong about the need for tens of thousands of additional ventilators and hospital beds. Trump provided much of both, but most of the ventilators were not used and the Javits Center and Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort both sat empty even when the nursing home exploded in layers with COVID-19 patients.

Now that his daily show is over, maybe the governor will be honest with himself about what he did wrong. If so, he must summon courage to meet with Arlene Mullin, Maria Porteus, Janice Dean, Aida’s sisters and Haydee Pabey and other New Yorkers who have lost loved ones in nursing homes.

He needs to hear their story, and they deserve an honest answer from their governor. We all do it.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top News

Prize for the Portuguese. Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week



Prize for the Portuguese.  Andre Silva is Champions League Player of the Week

BUTndre Silva won the competition and became the best player of the week in the Champions League, informed UEFAthis Thursday.

The former Porto striker scored in Jota’s 3-1 victory over Celtic Leipzig, scoring a brace in a match that was signed after his Portuguese compatriot equalized.

In addition, Andre Silva also provided the assist for Nkunku, scoring the first goal of this Wednesday’s game in which huge show of foreign fans.

In addition to the Leipzig striker, Di Maria (Juventus), Bellingham (Borussia Dortmund) and Di Lorenzo (Napoli) also fought in the fight for the prize, but it was the Portuguese who managed to smile after voting for the third round of the competition, the famous This Thursday is the fair.

Read also: Diogo Costa and Andre Silva named to Champions League Team of the Week

See also: Andre Silva among the nominees for the title of the best player of the week in the Champions League

See also: double dose. Andre Silva returned to celebrate and sentenced doubts

See also: Andre Silva took advantage of Hart’s colossal mistake and responded to Jota’s goal

Always be the first to know.
6th year in a row Consumers Choice and Five Star Award for Online Press.
Download our free app.

Apple Store Download

See also  The effort to fire a strong NY prosecutor appears to be the latest step to protect Trump
Continue Reading

Top News

Eternal Portuguese deja vu – Renaissance



Eternal Portuguese deja vu - Renaissance

At the end of the summer of 1972, exactly half a century ago, SEDES – Associação para o Desenvolvimento Económico e Social (the most famous reformist think tank during Marseilles) issued a document for the country entitled “Portugal: The country we are, the country we want to be “. The Marseille spring had already turned into autumn: Américo Thomas had just been re-elected, the colonial war had dragged on, repression had intensified, and an economic crisis was already brewing. Seeing the general frustration, and at the same time willing to go against it, the signatories of CEDES began by asking “Where will we be and how will we be in 1980?” to criticize the obstacles that overshadowed Portugal in the early 1970s.

Among the “problems that are getting worse without a solution”, emigration stood out, indicating the country’s inability to offer better living and working conditions to those who left; the growing inflationary process, reflected in the cost of living; the inevitability of economic integration in Europe when the country is not ready for international commercial competition; “disaggregation of regional economies” with “continuous depopulation of municipalities and regions” within the country; or “deterioration of public administration” when the government fails to promote a “prestigious, moralized, revitalized and efficient public sector”. “No one will have any difficulty,” continued the text, “to add to a new list of urgent questions that seriously endanger national life, about which much has been said and which, year after year, continue to wait for a sufficient solution.” Therefore, “the prevailing feeling in the country” in contemplation of the recent past and present could not but be “annoyance at urgent battles, the need for which was endlessly discussed, at decisions that were changed or postponed, and at rejected goals” or which were not clearly formulated ” .

See also  Can sausages increase the risk of cancer? Portuguese case and expert advice

Between “untapped resources” and/or “lack of organizational and decision-making capacity” there was “widespread anxiety” stemming from the inevitable observation that “we are very far from the results that we could achieve thanks to the progress of the Portuguese and Portugal”. This was the macro goal of the reformist, humanist and liberalizing technocrats that SEDES brought together. “Ultimately,” they reminded Marcelo Cayetano, “the real obstacle can only be associated with the low political priority of economic and social development in our country.” So, in short, there was an urgent need to “radically change our economic, social and political way of life”, since “a national balance based on general anemia, repression and weakening of various participants” is unsustainable and pernicious.

SEDES did not know that the Estado Novo would fall in April 1974, that democracy would come in 1976, and Europe from the EEC (after EFTA) in 1986 of repression, finally gained the freedom that was discussed between the lines of the 1972 manifesto ., there would be conditions for solving (almost) all economic and social problems of development and cohesion.

Fifty years have passed since this manifesto, and almost the same number has already been in democracy. However, if we compare the above quotes with the Portuguese present, the feeling of deja vu is indescribable. SEDES wondered what the country would be like in 1980 and is wondering today (in its recent study “Ambition: Doubling GDP in 20 Years”) where we will be in 2040. It may be a replay of a sad fate: knowing (some) where to go, but never getting there!

See also  Six major comeback that will go down in the history of New York sports

Continue Reading

Top News

Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy – Observer



Algeria interested in Portuguese companies investing in renewable energy - Observer

Foreign Minister João Gomes Cravinho met this Wednesday with his Algerian counterpart Ramtan Lamamra, who expressed interest in Portuguese companies investing in Algeria’s solar and wind energy.

Speaking with Lusa, João Cravinho also said that for 2023 it was decided to hold a “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the state visit of the President of Algeria. Algeria to Portugal.

The Portuguese foreign minister said today’s visit to Algeria, where he was with Ramtan Lamamra, whom he has known since 2005 when he was ambassador to Lisbon, is “based on old knowledge”, but also a visit to a country that “does not to be a neighbor”, shares “a lot of fears”. “Not being a neighboring country, it almost shares many concerns about the region, the Mediterranean, the European Union’s relationship with Africa and the Arab world. It was important for us to talk about what we can do together as part of the geopolitical and geo-economic transformation,” he explained.

João Cravinho stressed that the issue of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was a factor “which could not but be the subject of dialogue”, and also added that “geo-economic issues related to energy, renewable energy sources and the opportunities that come with the digital transition” also were on the table.


“While Algeria is a major exporter of fossil fuels, it is also a country with huge potential in terms of solar and wind energy. We have very qualified companies in these areas, and the Algerian side has expressed interest in [ter] Portuguese investors in these areas,” the minister said.

See also  The effort to fire a strong NY prosecutor appears to be the latest step to protect Trump

The official said that it would be a matter of working with the Portuguese Agency for Investment and Foreign Trade (AICEP), with the Secretary of State for Internationalization, as well as with a sectoral ministry, namely the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. A “high-level meeting chaired by the prime ministers” of the two countries is scheduled for 2023, a meeting to be held in Algiers, in addition to the Algerian President’s state visit to Portugal.

“We have a very busy calendar between the two countries. Now we will try to organize a mixed commission, where technical specialists from both countries will gather,” he said, stressing that there are “14 legal documents that are practically finalized and will be signed” in 2023.

João Gomes Cravinho was on a visit to Algiers today to assess bilateral relations in the economic sphere, as well as in terms of cooperation, language and culture, and to discuss international issues.

Continue Reading