MADRID – On April 28, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez stood alone on the stage of a bright but empty briefing room. When a CNN reporter asked a question via video link, the prime minister seemed very concentrated, scribbling notes and pausing to look at the monitor just once. As he launched the answer, he looked directly at the camera to brag about the volume of Covid-19 Spanish testing.
“We are one of the countries with the highest number of tests,” Sánchez said.
Initially, the prime minister cited data from the recent Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ranking which ranked Spain eighth in the Covid-19 test among its members.
“Today,” he added, “we have found another study, from Johns Hopkins University, that […] we ranked fifth in the world in total tests conducted. “
There are only two problems: OECD data is wrong. And while some sources put Spain in fifth place in the total test volume, Johns Hopkins is not one of them; the study cited by Sánchez does not exist.
But two weeks later, the Spanish government supported the substance of the prime minister’s claim. Instead of quoting Johns Hopkins, Spanish officials now point to testing the ranking of the so-called data aggregation website Worldometer – one of the sources behind the university’s widely cited coronavirus dashboard – and raises questions about why some respected governments and institutions choose to trust sources about what is little known.
Before the pandemic, the Worldometer was famous for its “counters”, which gave direct estimates of numbers such as the world’s population or the number of cars produced this year. His website shows that the revenue comes from advertising and licenses the counters. The Covid-19 crisis has undoubtedly increased the popularity of the website. This is one of the top ranking Google search results for coronavirus statistics. In the past six months, the Worldometer page has been distributed about 2.5 million times – up from only 65 shares in the first six months of 2019, according to statistics provided by BuzzSumo, a company that tracks social media engagement and provides insight into content.
Question the reliability of this coronavirus statistics site 3:36
The website claims “run by a team of developers, researchers and international volunteers” and “published by small, independent digital media companies based in the United States.”
But public records show little evidence about a company that employs a team of multilingual analysts and researchers. It is not clear whether the company has paid staff to check its data for accuracy or whether it only relies on automation and crowdsourcing. This site has at least one job post, starting in October, look for voluntary web developers.
After being known as Worldometers, this website was originally created in 2004 by Andrey Alimetov, a new 20-year-old immigrant from Russia who had just gotten his first IT job in New York.
“It’s a very simple website, there’s nothing crazy about it,” he recently told CNN.
In about a year, Alimetov said, the site gets 20,000 or 30,000 visits every day but it costs too much money for web hosting fees.
“There is no quick way to quickly cash out,” he said, so he registered the site on eBay and sold it for $ 2,000 around 2005 or 2006.
When the Reddit homepage displayed its old site in 2013, Alimetov sent an e-mail to the buyer, a man named Dario, to congratulate him.
In the answer, Dario said he bought the site to drive traffic to other websites.
When the businesses “began to decline, I decided to invest in a Worldometer, bringing resources and people to the point of taking their own course,” Dario wrote.
The worldometer no longer bears the trace “s” except in the URL. Apart from that, not much has changed.
Today, the Worldometer website owned by a company called Dadax LLC.
Representatives for Worldometer and Dadax did not respond to CNN’s request for an interview, but a state business report showed Dadax was first formed in Delaware, in 2002. The filing included the PO box as a company address. From 2003 to 2015, business submissions in Connecticut and New Jersey registered Dadax president as Dario Pasqualino. The filing address binds the company and Pasqualino to homes in Princeton, New Jersey, and Greenwich, Connecticut. The company is still actively registered in Delaware and has been in good standing since 2010.
The company shares the name Dadax with a software company based in Shanghai. In March, the two companies issued a statement rejecting connections. Dadax China said it was issued his statement after receiving “lots of calls and emails” about site statistics. Worldometer, in a tweet, said it had never had “any type of affiliation with entities based in China.”
The ID in the source code for Worldometer and the US Dadax website links it to at least two dozen other websites that appear to share ownership. Some don’t seem to work. Others, such as usalivestats.com, italiaora.org and stopthehunger.com, share the same premise: direct statistical counters. Most sites have rudimentary aesthetics, reminiscent of the internet of the 1990s or early 2000s. Some seem to be quite random. An Italian site displays Christmas poetry and gift suggestions, such as a bonsai plant (for her), or a piece of land on the moon (for her). Another site dedicated to Sicilian doll shows.
Someone with Pasqualino’s name and birthday is also registered as the sole owner in Italy. The business manages and sells “advertising space,” according to an Italian registration document submitted last year. The address led to a neat three-story apartment building on a lush street in an upscale neighborhood in Bologna.
CNN cannot reach Pasqualino through the contact information listed on the Worldometer and in public records.
According to the Worldometer website, Covid-19 data comes from a multilingual team that “monitors live broadcasts of press conferences” all day “and through crowdsourcing.
Visitors can report Covid-19 numbers and new data sources to the website – no name or email address is required. “The team of analysts and researchers” validated the data, the website said. This might, at first, sound like Wikipedia from the data world, but some Wikipedia editors have decided to avoid Worldometer as a source for Covid-19 data.
“Some updates have no source, do not match the source cited or contain errors,” wrote one editor, with the username MarioGom, writing in discussion page for Wikipedia editors who worked on Covid-19 related content last month. “Some errors are small and temporary, but some are relatively large and have never been fixed.”
The editor, whose real name is Mario Gómez, told CNN in an email, “Instead of trying to use consistent criteria, [Worldometer] seems to go for the highest number. They have a system for users to report higher numbers, but so far I have failed to use them to report that some numbers are wrong and must be lower. “
Edouard Mathieu, data manager for Our World in Data (OWID), an independent statistics website headquartered at Oxford University, has seen a similar trend.
“Their main focus seems to have the latest numbers no matter where they come from, whether it is reliable or not, whether it is sourced or not,” he said. “We think the public must be vigilant, especially the media, policy makers, and decision makers. This data is not as accurate as they thought. “
Virginia Pitzer, Yale University epidemiologist who focuses on modeling the spread of Covid-19 in the United States, said she had never heard of the Worldometer. CNN asked him to assess the reliability of the website.
“I think the Worldometer website is legitimate,” he wrote via email, explaining that many of its sources appear to be credible government websites. But he also found deficiencies, inconsistencies and lack of expert curation. “Data interpretation is still lacking,” he wrote, explaining that he found data about active cases to be “very problematic” because data about recovery was not reported consistently.
Pitzer also found several detailed explanations of the problems or differences in reporting data. For Spain, that is one sentence. For many other countries, there is no explanation at all.
He also found fault. In Spanish data, for example, the Worldometer reported more than 18,000 recoveries on April 24. The Spanish government reported 3,105 recoveries that day.
When Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez boasted about Spain’s high ranking, he did not pull the numbers out of the air. On April 27, the OECD incorrectly placed Spain eighth in per capita testing. Initially, OECD used data from OWID to be compiled the statistics. But it’s a source of Spanish numbers independently because OWID data is incomplete. Mixed sources change Spain’s position in the ranking because it calculates a wider test category than other countries’ figures. Organization corrected myself the next day, two hours before the Sánchez press conference, crashed Spain into 17th place.
In his statementThe OECD said “we regret the confusion created on sensitive issues by any debate on methodological issues” and stressed that increasing the availability of testing in general was more important than knowing where the ranking of any country was.
Sánchez’s later reference to the Johns Hopkins study, in which he said Spain ranked fifth for testing worldwide, appeared to be a case of diverse attribution by the prime minister. JHU has not published international testing figures. Jill Rosen, a school spokesman, told CNN that the university could not identify a report that matched Sánchez’s description.
At a press conference on May 9, Sánchez avoided CNN questions that urged him about the existence of the JHU study and registered government figures about total testing As a replacement. In comments made to Spanish reporters the following day, health minister Salvador Illa continued to insist that testing data had been released by JHU, even though he pointed to the Worldometer as the underlying source. Because Johns Hopkins got his data from the Worldometer, he argues, it’s just as good.
“This is data provided by John Hopkins University […] taken from as a fundamental source of information, the Worldometer website, “Illa said. “You can check it.”
It is true that on April 28, Worldometer data ranked Spain fifth when it came to total testing volumes. At that time, the OWID data also ranked Spain fifth, but as more countries began to report greater testing volumes, it became clear how the Worldometer data was flawed. The Spanish figures include a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which shows whether the patient is currently infected, and an antibody test, which shows whether the patient has been infected. For most countries other than Spain, Worldometer data seems to only count PCR tests.
Because so few countries report antibody testing data and to ensure the comparison of apples with apples, OWID says it only tracks PCR tests. With that measure, on May 17, Spain ranks sixth, behind the US, Russia, Germany, Italy and India. Worldometer ranked Spain fourth.
But relying on ranking with the number of raw tests conducted is still misleading because it does not take into account population differences between countries.
OWID data manager, Edouard Mathieu, said a far more fair way to compare test data was to take into account population size. On May 10, OWID put Spain 19th in testing per 1,000 people. Worldometer ranked Spain 15th in the same size.
The story of two ranks
Worldometer data does rank Spain fifth in terms of total testing volume. But relying on raw numbers is misleading because it doesn’t take into account differences between countries. When adjusted for population, Spain’s ranking dropped to 16th. Experts say this data, from the Worldometer, is further flawed because Spanish numbers calculate a broader test category than most other countries.
Roberto Rodríguez Aramayo, a research professor at the Spanish Institute of Philosophy of the National Research Council (CSIC) and former president of the Spanish ethics association, said Spain reported data from the two types of tests that were the most reliable.
“Unfortunately, it seems certain [political] interested in the readings given from this data, when they are displayed, “he said.
What does Worldometer have to do with Johns Hopkins University?
Johns Hopkins has not published international data on Covid-19 testing, but lists the Worldometer as one of several sources the widely quoted coronavirus dashboard.
The university has refused to say what specific data points are the mainstay of the Worldometer, but problems with the counter data site have caused at least one important error.
On April 8, the global tally of Covid-19 cases confirmed by JHU briefly passed 1.5 million before dropping by more than 30,000. Johns Hopkins then posted an explanation for the incident on the GitHub page. At the time, JHU told CNN that the error appeared to stem from double counting of nursing home cases in France. But French officials told CNN that there was no revision, even for nursing home data. Johns Hopkins data seem to come directly from the Worldometer. Website does not specify source.
One of Wikipedia’s editors, James Heilman, assistant clinical professor of emergency medicine at the University of British Columbia, said Wikipedia volunteers have seen persistent errors with the Worldometer, but also with “a more well-known name with a longer history of accuracy,” referring to Johns Hopkins. “We hope they also double check the numbers.”
In an article published in February, JHU said it began manually tracking Covid-19 data for its dashboard in January. When it becomes unsustainable, universities begin to collect data from major sources and aggregation websites. Laura Gardner, engineering professor who manages the Covid-19 university dashboard, told CNN at a statement that universities use a “two-stage anomaly detection system” to capture potential data problems. “Medium” changes are automatically added to the dashboard but marked so staff can check them in real time. Changes outside certain limits require “humans to check and approve values manually before being published to the dashboard,” Gardner said.
The university’s dependence on the Worldometer surprised a number of academics.
Phil Beaver, a data scientist at the University of Denver, seemed lost for words when asked what he thought of JHU quoting the Worldometer.
“I’m not sure, that’s a good question, I kind of get the impression that Worldometer is relying on [Johns] Hopkins, “he told CNN after a long pause.
Mathieu also looked surprised.
“I think JHU has been under a lot of pressure to update their numbers,” he said. “Because of this pressure, they are forced or given incentives to get data from places they should not have, but in general I hope JHU will become a fairly reliable source.”
In a university response to CNN, Gardner said the Worldometer was one of “dozens” of sources and that “before entering new sources, we validated their data by comparing it with other references.”
“We try not to use a single source for our data,” Gardner added. “We use reporting from public health agencies and sources of aggregation to validate cross-figures.”
The British government quoted Worldometer data on Covid-19’s death during its daily press conference for much of April, before turning to Johns Hopkins data.
“Both Worldometer and John Hopkins provide comprehensive and respected data. As the situation develops, we transfer from the Worldometer to John Hopkins because John Hopkins relies more on official sources, “said a statement from a spokesman for the British government.
‘Contaminating public opinion’
In Spain, John Hopkins’ apparent misunderstanding from Sánchez has become a major controversy. In parliament on Wednesday, lawmakers from the center-right People’s Party Cayetana Alvarez de Toledo called the party’s government “a lie for CNN and the people of Spain.”
On May 10, a spokesman for the Spanish embassy in London complained to CNN about its coverage of the issue.
“Back in April, Sánchez mentioned an analysis of statistical data carried out by Johns Hopkins University based on data published by Worldometer,” the spokeswoman wrote in an email sent to the network’s diplomatic editor just after 4am.
“Even if Mr. Sánchez does not mention the Worldometer as the main source in his remarks, [CNN] can know that most of the comparisons and analyzes about Covid-19 are used in the world [Worldometer’s] table. “
In his remarks to CNN, a spokesman for the prime minister’s office acknowledged that the Worldometer counted PCR tests and antibody tests together and rejected calls for criticism to adjust testing numbers for the population, calling it a “trap that was by the OECD and the Spanish press. […] has fallen into “and argues that Spain should not be compared to small countries like Malta, Luxembourg or Bahrain.
However, it is not clear why the Spanish government continues to insist that test data published by Worldometer be issued by Johns Hopkins University.
His refusal to acknowledge the attribution error occurred only a month after Spanish Justice Minister Juan Carlos Campo said the government was considering amending the law, trying to crack down on people peddling misinformation.
“I believe, it is more than justified – with calmness, calmness needed for any changes to the law – that we are reviewing our legal instruments to stop public opinion that contaminates seriously and unfairly,” Campo said.
At the time, Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth told CNN in an email, “If the justice minister suggests punishing speeches that pollute public opinion, that would be very dangerous.”
“Turning the government into a censor will weaken public accountability at the most immediate time,” Roth warned.
In its letter to CNN, the embassy’s spokesman stated emphatically that Spain – and still is – the fifth in the world in the Covid-19 test, attached a screenshot of the Worldometer table as evidence.
“The numbers speak louder than words,” he wrote. “And do not want to admit the truth of reality […] very worrying, to say the least. “
General internet buff. Hardcore music maven. Typical foodaholic. Friendly student.
Who is Paulo Bento, the Portuguese coach from South Korea who coached Cruzeiro?
The coach commanded the Portuguese national team at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil and left the South Korean national team after being eliminated in Qatar.
Portuguese coach Paulo Bento qualified South Korea for the playoffs of the World Cup, something the team had not achieved since 2010, when the South Korean team reached the 1/8 finals of this championship. But 4-1 rout against Brazil as a result, shortened the path of the Asian team, as well as put an end to the work of Paulo Sousa in the national team.
Paulo Bento started his career as a coach with the youth team of Sporting Clube Portugal in 2004. At the club, he commanded the youth team for two seasons, winning the junior national tournament in his first year. Incidentally, the coach took over the first team shortly after he announced his retirement as a player.
Given his prominence in the youth categories, Paulo was chosen to replace José Peseiro, who was eliminated in European competition, in the professional team of Sporting CP for the 2005 season./2006.
Professionally, Bento was runner-up for four seasons in a row in the Portuguese Championship. Despite this, the coach won two Portuguese Cups and two Candido de Oliveira Super Cups. On November 6, 2009, the coach resigned.
Having distinguished himself at Sporting, Paulo Bento was announced as Portugal’s coach on 21 September 2010 after the World Cup in South Africa, where the then-champion Spain was selected in the round of 16.
In qualifying, the coach managed to show good results in the first games, plus, of course, take Portugal to the semi-finals of Euro 2012, taking off from Spain on penalties. Having stood out in competitions, the coach extended the contract until Euro 2016.
However, after losing to Albania in qualifying for Euro 2016, the coach could not resist and was fired in September 2014. The unsuccessful campaign at the World Cup of the same year in Brazil also affected.
After the Portugal national team, Paulo Bento returned to Brazil in May 2016, but this time to coach the Cruzeiro club. With a contract until December 2017, the coach made his debut in the second round of the Brasileirão the same year.
Washington Alves/Light Press/Cruzeiro
However, Bento only lasted 17 matches in power with six wins, three draws and eight losses, leaving the team in second-to-last place in the tournament.
On 11 August 2016, the coach was announced as the new commander of Olympiacos, Greece, where he remained until 6 March 2017, winning the Greek title. Following this, Paulo Bento was announced as Chongqing Dangdai of China leading the team for only 15 matches.
On August 16, 2018, Paulo Bento was announced as the new coach of South Korea following the departure of Shin Tae-yong, who lost in the group stage of the 2018 World Cup.
As part of the South Korean national team, the coach has 55 wins, 12 draws and eight losses, having won the East Asian Cup title and classified the team at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. After being knocked out against Brazil in the 1/8 finals, the Portuguese announced his retirement from the national team.
Pioli ‘pulls’ Leao by the ears and says the Portuguese ‘must make a dash’
FROMTefano Pioli, Milan coach, gave an interview on the Italian radio program Sky Calcio Club on Sunday in which he talked about Rafael Leao’s participation in the 2022 Mundial, a test in which the Portuguese striker was a replacement for Fernando Santos. ‘, indicating that he has been talking to his player over the past few days.
“If we talk? They have an obligation to call me at the end of the game. He is happy because Portugal is doing well. It is clear that he would like to play more. I can take advantage of this for a contract extension,” said Pioli, who also spoke about the Portuguese’s renewal process.
“He is fine with us and management and Rafael are talking. We are waiting for good news,” the Transalpine coach fired.
Looking at his player’s short playing time at this 2022 World Cup, Pioli admitted that Rafael Leau would like to have more playing time for the national team, but hinted that the Portuguese striker is not unhappy.
“If he plays a little? It’s hard to judge because Portugal has a very high quality team. Rafael is happy because Portugal is having a good World Cup, but there is a lot of quality and competitiveness in the attacking sector of the Portuguese team. “, – stressed the coach of the Italian, who also left a small warning to Rafael Leau.
“When you see him in training, you immediately understand that he has incredible potential. He has technique and speed that few others have. Over the course of a period, he had to develop and adapt to the reality at Milan, where the pressure is different from what he is. he was in Lille. It took time, but his potential to become a great player was always there. But he still needs to make the leap to become a champion because he can be even more decisive in the opponent’s zone,” he stressed.
“If you think about Rafael from two years ago, he has made tremendous progress. He’s missing a few things, but he’s smart and approachable. I can give him all the ideas he wants, but his talent must be left free. should improve his heading, given his physique,” he concluded.
Proud web evangelist. Travel ninja. Creator. Freelance food nerd. Passionate bacon fanatic.
Portugal, nuts and the Portuguese consumer: a successful trilogy
Nuts have become part of a limited group of Portuguese agri-food sectors that manage to achieve much-desired food self-sufficiency. In the case of almonds it is 170% and in the case of chestnuts it is 116% in relation to the national consumption.
The value of Portuguese agricultural production in 2021 was 9.6 billion euros, representing a growth rate of 14.6% compared to 2020, and therefore it is fair to say that dried fruits today, with a production of 80,000 tons and exports reaching 100 million euros contributed. to this success.
A lot has passed before we got here, as dried fruits have always been produced in Portugal, and almonds are a crop that has existed in Europe for thousands of years. The breakthrough element was, first of all, the fact that over the past 10 years we have witnessed a revolution in precision farming, irrigation and varieties that increase productivity up to five times.
Few people know that Portugal was the country in the world that grew the most in terms of percentage in the almond sector, both in terms of area and production, which positions us as a contender in relation to the world’s largest producer of almonds. almonds, which is located in the USA (70% of world production). Is this still the story of David and Goliath? Yes it is! But this phenomenon is of greater importance not from a quantitative point of view, in which Portugal currently occupies an undeniable place at the European level (3rd largest producer), but from a qualitative point of view, since Portuguese or Mediterranean almonds are now beginning to be appreciated for its quality and large international traders, more and more confirming consumer preferences.
What can Portugal say to the Portuguese consumer and also to the European nut consumer? Something simple and perhaps more and more meaningful in our rational but also emotional consumer desires. Today we are seeing problems in live supply chains and we think it makes sense to cut those chains in the direction of what should be EU food self-sufficiency.
An analysis of environmental sustainability needs to be carried out on a planetary scale, and this is where Portugal has a comparative advantage. Firstly, for the production of irrigated dried fruits, compared to the world’s largest producer, Portugal uses less water because it irrigates with modern drip systems and the CO2 emission cycle is lower, as it reduces transport and logistics chains precisely because it is closer to a large consumer market which is Europe.
Today, due to inflation, Portugal has the most expensive food basket in the EU, just behind Germany and Sweden. The bet cannot be to close Portugal, given that Portugal must be self-sufficient on its own, but it becomes clear that Portugal must produce what it is empirically good at, which allows it to exploit the investment.
Does this mean that Portugal meets its dietary needs by eating almonds and tomatoes or drinking olive oil and wine (foods that we are self-sufficient for)? Of course not! The logic of food self-sufficiency must necessarily be European, in which each of the 27 member countries produces what it has an appetite and conditions for, ensuring quality and competitive prices throughout the world.
In fact, there is a happy coincidence – it is the sectors that are self-sufficient in Portugal that are also the most exporting sectors, and not only in terms of quantity, but also in terms of quality. Just think of wine, olive oil and, of course, dried fruit!
Executive Director Portugal Nuts
Proud web evangelist. Travel ninja. Creator. Freelance food nerd. Passionate bacon fanatic.
World1 year ago
The Gabby Petito case. Brian Landry set up camp with his family after his girlfriend disappeared
Top News3 years ago
Tristan Thompson reacts to Khloé Kardashian’s new appearance
Top News3 years ago
Alex Cooper hosts a solo podcast
Top News2 years ago
2021 Ford Bronco price: Here’s how much the 2-door and 4-door cost
Top News2 years ago
TLC ‘sMothered’ recap: ‘Party curled up,’ boyfriend problem
Tech2 years ago
Fall Guys is supplying out a legendary costume and Kudos as an apology present
Top News3 years ago
Chiara de Blasio was ‘very cold’ during the arrest of the protest: witness
Top News2 years ago
How to Watch Yellowstone Season 3, Episode 2 Live Online